Free Access
Issue
Environ. Biosafety Res.
Volume 4, Number 3, July-September 2005
Page(s) 141 - 166
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2005019
Published online 16 March 2006
  • Alvarez-Buylla E (2003) Ecological and biological aspects of the impacts of transgenic maize, including agro-biodiversity, Prepared for the Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation of North America, as part of the Article 13 initiative on Maize and Biodiversity: the Effects of Transgenic Maize in Mexico. Published on line at www.cec.org [Google Scholar]
  • Alvarez-Morales A (2002) Transgenes in maize landraces in Oaxaca: official report on the extent and implications. http://www.worldbiosafety.net/ [Google Scholar]
  • Andow DA, Daniell H, Gepts P, Lamkey KR, Nafziger E, Strayer D (2004) A growing concern: Protecting the food supply in an era of pharmaceutical and industrial crops. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, MA. Union of Concerned Scientists, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  • Aquino P, Carrión F, Calvo R, Flores D (2001) Selected maize statistics. In Pingali PL, ed., CIMMYT 1999–2000 World maize facts and trends. Meeting world maize needs: technological opportunities and priorities for the public sector. CIMMYT, DF, Mexico, pp 45–57 [Google Scholar]
  • Aragón Cuevas F, Soleri D, Cleveland DA (n.d.) Farmers’ practices, knowledge and values regarding maize improvement and transgenes in four communities in Oaxaca, Mexico [Google Scholar]
  • Brown AHD (1999) The genetic structure of crop landraces and the challenge to conserve them in situ on farms. In Brush SB, ed, Genes in the field: on-farm conservation of crop diversity. Lewis Publishers; IPGRI; IDRC, Boca Raton, Florida; Rome; Ottawa, pp 29–48 [Google Scholar]
  • Burgess JA, Walsh AJ (1998) Is genetic engineering wrong, per se? J. Value Inquiry 32: 393–406 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • CEC (2004) Maize and biodiversity: the effects of transgenic maize in Mexico. Key findings and recommendations. Secretariat article 13 report. Montreal: CEC. 2004. 2004 Nov 10. http://www.cec.org/files/PDF//Maize-and-Biodiver-sity_en.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Ceccarelli S (1997) Adaptation to low/high input cultivation. In Tigerstedt PMA, ed, Adaptation and plant breeding. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 225–236 [Google Scholar]
  • Ceccarelli S, Erskine W, Hamblin J, Grando S (1994) Genotype by environment interaction and international breeding programmes. Exp. Agric. 30: 177–187 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • CGIAR (2005) CGIAR & agricultural biotechnology: CGIAR. 2005. March 7. http://www.cgiar.org/impact/agribiotech.html [Google Scholar]
  • Chilcutt CF, Tabashnik BE (2004) Contamination of refuges by Bacillus thuringiensis toxin genes from transgenic maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 7526–7529 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cleveland DA (2001) Is plant breeding science objective truth or social construction? The case of yield stability. Agric. Human Values 18: 251–270 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cleveland DA, Soleri D, eds (2002) Farmers, scientists and plant breeding: integrating knowledge and practice. CABI Publishing, Oxon, UK [Google Scholar]
  • Cleveland DA, Soleri D (2005) Rethinking the risk management process for GE crops in Third World agriculture. Ecol. Society 10 (1): Article 9. [online] http://www. ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art9/ [Google Scholar]
  • Daniell H (2002) Molecular strategies for gene containment in transgenic crops. Nat. Biotechnol. 20: 581–586 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • De Groote H, Mugo S, Bergvinson D, Odhiambo B (2005) Assessing the benefits and risks of GE crops: evidence from the Insect Resistant Maize for Africa Project. ISB News February 2005: 7–9 [Google Scholar]
  • Dilley M (1997) Climatic factors affecting annual maize yields in the valley of Oaxaca, Mexico. Int. J. Climatol. 17: 1549–1557 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dittrich R, Hatzinger R, Katzenbeisser W (1998) Modelling the effect of subject-specific covariates in paired comparison studies with an application to university rankings. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C-Appl. Stat. soc. 47: 511–525 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Doebley J (2004) The genetics of maize evolution. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38: 37–59 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Eastham K, Sweet J (2002) Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): the significance of gene flow through pollen transfer. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark [Google Scholar]
  • Ellis F (1993) Peasant economics: farm households and agrarian development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK [Google Scholar]
  • Ellstrand NC (2003) Current knowledge of gene flow in plants: implications for transgene flow. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 358: 1163–1170 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ellstrand NC (2003a) Dangerous liaisons? When cultivated plants mate with their wild relatives. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore [Google Scholar]
  • Ellstrand NC (2003b) Going to “great lengths” to prevent the escape of genes that produce specialty chemicals. Plant Physiol. 132: 1770–1774 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • EPA (1998) The Environmental Protection Agency’s White Paper on Bt Plant-pesticide Resistance Management, EPA White Papers. EPA, Washington, DC, pp 78 [Google Scholar]
  • Evans LT (1993) Crop evolution, adaptation and yield. Cambridge University Press., Cambridge, UK [Google Scholar]
  • Evans LT (1998) Feeding the ten billion: Plants and population growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK [Google Scholar]
  • Falkenmark M (1994) Landscape as life-support provider: water-related limitations. In Graham-Smith F, ed, Population, the complex reality. The Royal Society, London, pp 103–116 [Google Scholar]
  • FAO (2004) Agricultural biotechnology: meeting the needs of the poor? The state of food and agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations, Rome, Italy [Google Scholar]
  • FAOSTAT Data (2005) Agricultural Data. 2005. 4 July 2005. http://faostat.fao.org/faostat/collections?version=ext&hasbulk =0&subset=agriculture [Google Scholar]
  • Fernandez-Cornejo J (2004) The seed industry in US agriculture. In USDA-ERS, ed, Agriculture Information Bulletin. USDA-ERS, pp 81 [Google Scholar]
  • Fienberg SE, Larntz K (1976) Log linear representation for paired and multiple comparisons models. Biometrika 63: 245–254 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Fitt GP, Andow DA, Carriére Y, Moar WJ, Schuler TH, Omoto C, Kanya J, Okech MA, Arama P, Maniania NK (2004) Resistance risks and management associated with Bt maize in Kenya. In Hilbeck A, Andow DA, eds, Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms: Volume 1. A case study of Bt maize in Kenya. CAB International, Oxfordshire, UK, pp 209–250 [Google Scholar]
  • Frankel OH, Brown AHD, Burdon JJ (1995) The conservation of plant biodiversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK [Google Scholar]
  • Frewer L (2003) Societal issues and public attitudes towards genetically modified foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 14: 319–332 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gaskell G, Allum N, Stares S (2003) Europeans and Biotechnology in 2002. A report to the EC Directorate General for Research from the project ‘Life Sciences in European Society’ QLG7-CT-1999-00286. Public Opinion Analysis Sector, European Commission, http://europa.eu.int/comm/public{Iopinion/archives/ebbb/ebs}177{Ien.pdf, Brussels, Belgium}} [Google Scholar]
  • Goklany IM (2002) From precautionary principle to risk-risk analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 20: 1075 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gonzalez A (2005) Territory, autonomy and defending maize. Seedling (January): 14–17 [Google Scholar]
  • Goodman MM (2004) Plant breeding requirements for applied molecular biology. Crop Sci. 44: 1913–1914 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gould F (1998) Sustainability of transgenic insecticidal cultivars: integrating pest genetics and ecology. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 43: 701–726 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gould F, Cohen MB (2000) Sustainable use of genetically modified crops in developing countries. In Persley G, Lantin M, eds, Agricultural biotechnology and the poor: an international conference. CGIAR (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research), Washington, DC, pp 139–146 [Google Scholar]
  • Hallman WK, Hebden WC, Cuite CL, Aquino HL, Lang JT (2004) Americans and GM food: Knowledge, opinion and interest in 2004. Food Policy Institute, Cook College, Rutgers – The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey [Google Scholar]
  • Hardaker JB, Huirne RBM, Anderson JR (1997) Coping with risk in agriculture. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK [Google Scholar]
  • Heisey PW, Edmeades GO (1999) Part 1. Maize production in drought-stressed environments: technical options and research resource allocation. In CIMMYT, ed, World maize facts and trends 1997/98. CIMMYT, Mexico, DF, pp 1–36 [Google Scholar]
  • Hernández Xolocotzi E (1985) Maize and man in the greater southwest. Econ. Bot. 39: 416–430 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hilbeck A, Andow DA, eds (2004) A case study of Bt maize in Kenya. CABI, Wallingford, Osfordshire, UK [Google Scholar]
  • Huang J, Hu R, Pray C, Qiao F, Rozelle S (2003) Biotechnology as an alternative to chemical pesticides: a case study of Bt cotton in China. Agric. Econ. 29: 55–67 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Huang JK, Hu RF, Rozelle S, Pray C (2005) Insect-resistant GM rice in farmers’ fields: Assessing productivity and health effects in China. Science 308: 688–690 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • INEGI (1996) Anuario Estadístico del Estado de Oaxaca, Edición 1996. INEGI, Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico [Google Scholar]
  • INEGI (2001) Sistema para la consulta del annuario estadístico. INEGI, Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico [Google Scholar]
  • INEGI (2005) Indicadores del XII censo general de población y vivienda 2000. Mexico. 2005. 2 August 2005. http://www.inegi.gob.mx/est/default.asp?c=5171 [Google Scholar]
  • Instituto Nacional de Economia (2004) IV Censo Nacional Agropecuario 2003. INE, Guatemala [Google Scholar]
  • James C (2004) Preview: global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2004. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA. http://www.isaaa.org/kc/CBTNews/press_release/briefs32/ESummary/Executive%20Summary%20(English).pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Kenward K, Brandle J, McPherson J, Davies P (1999) Type II fish antifreeze protein accumulation in transgenic tobacco does not confer frost resistance. Transgenic Res. 8: 105–117 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Klinger T (2002) Variability and uncertainty in crop-to-wild hybridization. In Letourneau DK, Elpern Burrows B, eds, Genetically engineered organisms: assessing environmental and human health effects. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 1–15 [Google Scholar]
  • Louette D, Charrier A, Berthaud J (1997) In situ conservation of maize in Mexico: genetic diversity and maize seed management in a traditional community. Econ. Bot. 51: 20–38 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Louette D, Smale M (2000) Farmers’ seed selection practices and maize variety characteristics in a traditional Mexican community. Euphytica 113: 25–41 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Luna VS, Figueroa J, Baltazar MB, Gomez LR, Townsend R, Shoper JB (2001) Maize pollen longevity and distance isolation requirements for effective pollen control. Crop Sci. 41: 1551–1557 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ma BL, Subedi KD, Reid LM (2004) Extent of cross-fertilization in maize by pollen from neighboring transgenic hybrids. Crop Sci. 44: 1273–1282 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Matsuoka Y, Vigouroux Y, Goodman MM, Sanchez GJ, Buckler E, Doebley J (2002) A single domestication for maize shown by multilocus microsatellite genotyping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 6080–6084 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Messeguer J (2003) Gene flow assessment in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 73: 201–212 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Millennium Project (2005) Halving hunger: it can be done. Earthscan, London [Google Scholar]
  • Monsanto Company (2004) Growing options. Monsanto 2004 pledge report. St Louis, Missouri: Monstanto Company. 2004. November 9. http://www.monsanto.com/monsanto/content/media/pubs/2004/pledgereport.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Mora JE (2005) Central America: UN agency accused of distributing GM foods: Inter Press Service News Agency. 2005. June 23. http://ipsnews.net/new_nota.asp?idnews= 27498 [Google Scholar]
  • Morris ML (1998) Maize seed industries in developing countries. Lynne Rienner, Boulder, Colorado [Google Scholar]
  • Murphy K, Lammer D, Lyon S, Carter B, Jones SS (2005) Breeding for organic and low-input farming systems: An evolutionary-participatory breeding method for inbred cereal grains. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 20: 48–55 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nadal A (2000) The environmental and social impacts of economic liberalization on corn production in Mexico. World Wide Fund for Nature, and Oxfam GB, Gland, Switzerland, and Oxford, UK [Google Scholar]
  • Narayanan S, Gulati A (2002) Globalization and the smallholders: a review of issues, approaches, and implications. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  • Nelson KC, Kibata G, Muhammad L, Okuro JO, Muyekho F, Odinho M, Ely A, Waquil JM (2004) Problem formulation and options assessment (PFOA) for genetically modified organisms: The Kenya case study. In Hilbeck A, Andow DA, eds, Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms, Volume 1: A case study of Bt maize in Kenya. CAB International, Walingford, UK, pp 57–82 [Google Scholar]
  • NRC (1996) Understanding risk: informing decisions in a democratic society. National Academy Press, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  • NRC (2002) Environmental effects of transgenic plants: the scope and adequacy of regulation. National Academy Press, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  • NRC (2004) Biological confinement of genetically engineered organisms, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  • Ortiz-García S, Ezcurra E, Schoel B, Acevedo F, Soberón J, Snow AA (2005) Absence of detectable transgenes in local landraces of maize in Oaxaca, Mexico (2003-2004). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 12338–12343 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pressoir G, Berthaud J (2004) Patterns of population structure in maize landraces from the Central Valleys of Oaxaca in Mexico. Heredity 92: 88–94 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Quist D, Chapela IH (2001) Transgenic DNA introgressed into traditional maize landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico. Nature 414: 541–543 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • SAGARPA (2004) Producción agrícola, año 2003, Servicio de información y estadística agroalimentaria y pesquera (SIAP). Mexico: SAGARPA. 2005. 2 August 2005. http://www. sagarpa.gob.mx [Google Scholar]
  • SAS Institute (2001) SAS System for Windows. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina [Google Scholar]
  • Simmonds NW, Smartt J (1999) Principles of crop improvement. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, UK [Google Scholar]
  • Snow AA, Andow DA, Gepts P, Hallerman EM, Power A, Tiedje JM, Wolfenbarger LL (2005) Genetically engineered organisms and the environment: Current status and recommendations. Ecol. Appl. 15: 377–404 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Soleri D, Cleveland DA (2005) Scenarios as a tool for eliciting and understanding farmers’ biological knowledge. Field Methods 17: 283–301 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Soleri D, Cleveland DA, Smith SE, Ceccarelli S, Grando S, Rana RB, Rijal D, Ríos Labrada H (2002) Understanding farmers’ knowledge as the basis for collaboration with plant breeders: methodological development and examples from ongoing research in Mexico, Syria, Cuba, and Nepal. In Cleveland DA, Soleri D, eds, Farmers, scientists and plant breeding: integrating knowledge and practice. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, pp 19–60 [Google Scholar]
  • Soleri D, Smith SE, Cleveland DA (2000) Evaluating the potential for farmer and plant breeder collaboration: a case study of farmer maize selection in Oaxaca, Mexico. Euphytica 116: 41–57 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Storer NP (2003) Sensitivity analysis of a spatially-explicit stochastic simulation model of the evolution of resitance in Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to Bt transgenic corn and cotton. J. Econ. Entomol. 96: 173–187 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Thirtle C, Beyers L, Ismael Y (2003) Can GM-Technologies Help the Poor? The Impact of Bt Cotton in Makhathini Flats, KwaZulu-Natal. World Develop. 31: 717–732 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Traxler G, Godoy-Avila S (2004) Transgenic cotton in Mexico. AgBioForum 7: 57–62 [Google Scholar]
  • USDA FAS (2005) FAS Online US Trade Internet System [Google Scholar]
  • USDA NASS (2004) Crop Production-Prospective Planting-Supplement. 2004. nov 9. http://www.nass.usda.gov/census/census02/volume1/us/st99_1_001_001.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Walker TS (1989) Yield and household income variability in India’s semi-arid tropics. In Anderson JR, Hazell PBR, eds, Variability in Grain Yields: Implications for agricultural research and policy in developing countries. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, pp 309– 319 [Google Scholar]
  • Yang PY, Iles M, Yan S, Jolliffe F (2005) Farmers’ knowledge, perceptions and practices in transgenic Bt cotton in small producer systems in Northern China. Crop Prot. 24: 229–239 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zeven AC (1998) Landraces: a review of definitions and classifications. Euphytica 104: 127–139 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhong G-Y (2001) Genetic issues and pitfalls in transgenic breeding. Euphytica 118: 137–144 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhu YY, Chen HR, Fan JH, Wang YY, Li Y, Chen JB, Fan JX, Yang SS, Hu LP, Leung H, Mew TW, Teng PS, Wang ZH, Mundt CC (2000) Genetic diversity and disease control in rice. Nature 406: 718–722 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]