Free Access
Issue
Environ. Biosafety Res.
Volume 4, Number 3, July-September 2005
Page(s) 141 - 166
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2005019
Published online 16 March 2006
  • Alvarez-Buylla E (2003) Ecological and biological aspects of the impacts of transgenic maize, including agro-biodiversity, Prepared for the Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation of North America, as part of the Article 13 initiative on Maize and Biodiversity: the Effects of Transgenic Maize in Mexico. Published on line at www.cec.org
  • Alvarez-Morales A (2002) Transgenes in maize landraces in Oaxaca: official report on the extent and implications. http://www.worldbiosafety.net/
  • Andow DA, Daniell H, Gepts P, Lamkey KR, Nafziger E, Strayer D (2004) A growing concern: Protecting the food supply in an era of pharmaceutical and industrial crops. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, MA. Union of Concerned Scientists, Washington, DC
  • Aquino P, Carrión F, Calvo R, Flores D (2001) Selected maize statistics. In Pingali PL, ed., CIMMYT 1999–2000 World maize facts and trends. Meeting world maize needs: technological opportunities and priorities for the public sector. CIMMYT, DF, Mexico, pp 45–57
  • Aragón Cuevas F, Soleri D, Cleveland DA (n.d.) Farmers’ practices, knowledge and values regarding maize improvement and transgenes in four communities in Oaxaca, Mexico
  • Brown AHD (1999) The genetic structure of crop landraces and the challenge to conserve them in situ on farms. In Brush SB, ed, Genes in the field: on-farm conservation of crop diversity. Lewis Publishers; IPGRI; IDRC, Boca Raton, Florida; Rome; Ottawa, pp 29–48
  • Burgess JA, Walsh AJ (1998) Is genetic engineering wrong, per se? J. Value Inquiry 32: 393–406 [CrossRef]
  • CEC (2004) Maize and biodiversity: the effects of transgenic maize in Mexico. Key findings and recommendations. Secretariat article 13 report. Montreal: CEC. 2004. 2004 Nov 10. http://www.cec.org/files/PDF//Maize-and-Biodiver-sity_en.pdf
  • Ceccarelli S (1997) Adaptation to low/high input cultivation. In Tigerstedt PMA, ed, Adaptation and plant breeding. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 225–236
  • Ceccarelli S, Erskine W, Hamblin J, Grando S (1994) Genotype by environment interaction and international breeding programmes. Exp. Agric. 30: 177–187 [CrossRef]
  • CGIAR (2005) CGIAR & agricultural biotechnology: CGIAR. 2005. March 7. http://www.cgiar.org/impact/agribiotech.html
  • Chilcutt CF, Tabashnik BE (2004) Contamination of refuges by Bacillus thuringiensis toxin genes from transgenic maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 7526–7529 [CrossRef]
  • Cleveland DA (2001) Is plant breeding science objective truth or social construction? The case of yield stability. Agric. Human Values 18: 251–270 [CrossRef]
  • Cleveland DA, Soleri D, eds (2002) Farmers, scientists and plant breeding: integrating knowledge and practice. CABI Publishing, Oxon, UK
  • Cleveland DA, Soleri D (2005) Rethinking the risk management process for GE crops in Third World agriculture. Ecol. Society 10 (1): Article 9. [online] http://www. ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art9/
  • Daniell H (2002) Molecular strategies for gene containment in transgenic crops. Nat. Biotechnol. 20: 581–586 [PubMed]
  • De Groote H, Mugo S, Bergvinson D, Odhiambo B (2005) Assessing the benefits and risks of GE crops: evidence from the Insect Resistant Maize for Africa Project. ISB News February 2005: 7–9
  • Dilley M (1997) Climatic factors affecting annual maize yields in the valley of Oaxaca, Mexico. Int. J. Climatol. 17: 1549–1557 [CrossRef]
  • Dittrich R, Hatzinger R, Katzenbeisser W (1998) Modelling the effect of subject-specific covariates in paired comparison studies with an application to university rankings. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C-Appl. Stat. soc. 47: 511–525 [CrossRef]
  • Doebley J (2004) The genetics of maize evolution. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38: 37–59 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Eastham K, Sweet J (2002) Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): the significance of gene flow through pollen transfer. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Ellis F (1993) Peasant economics: farm households and agrarian development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
  • Ellstrand NC (2003) Current knowledge of gene flow in plants: implications for transgene flow. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 358: 1163–1170 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Ellstrand NC (2003a) Dangerous liaisons? When cultivated plants mate with their wild relatives. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
  • Ellstrand NC (2003b) Going to “great lengths” to prevent the escape of genes that produce specialty chemicals. Plant Physiol. 132: 1770–1774 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • EPA (1998) The Environmental Protection Agency’s White Paper on Bt Plant-pesticide Resistance Management, EPA White Papers. EPA, Washington, DC, pp 78
  • Evans LT (1993) Crop evolution, adaptation and yield. Cambridge University Press., Cambridge, UK
  • Evans LT (1998) Feeding the ten billion: Plants and population growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
  • Falkenmark M (1994) Landscape as life-support provider: water-related limitations. In Graham-Smith F, ed, Population, the complex reality. The Royal Society, London, pp 103–116
  • FAO (2004) Agricultural biotechnology: meeting the needs of the poor? The state of food and agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations, Rome, Italy
  • FAOSTAT Data (2005) Agricultural Data. 2005. 4 July 2005. http://faostat.fao.org/faostat/collections?version=ext&hasbulk =0&subset=agriculture
  • Fernandez-Cornejo J (2004) The seed industry in US agriculture. In USDA-ERS, ed, Agriculture Information Bulletin. USDA-ERS, pp 81
  • Fienberg SE, Larntz K (1976) Log linear representation for paired and multiple comparisons models. Biometrika 63: 245–254 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Fitt GP, Andow DA, Carriére Y, Moar WJ, Schuler TH, Omoto C, Kanya J, Okech MA, Arama P, Maniania NK (2004) Resistance risks and management associated with Bt maize in Kenya. In Hilbeck A, Andow DA, eds, Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms: Volume 1. A case study of Bt maize in Kenya. CAB International, Oxfordshire, UK, pp 209–250
  • Frankel OH, Brown AHD, Burdon JJ (1995) The conservation of plant biodiversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
  • Frewer L (2003) Societal issues and public attitudes towards genetically modified foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 14: 319–332 [CrossRef]
  • Gaskell G, Allum N, Stares S (2003) Europeans and Biotechnology in 2002. A report to the EC Directorate General for Research from the project ‘Life Sciences in European Society’ QLG7-CT-1999-00286. Public Opinion Analysis Sector, European Commission, http://europa.eu.int/comm/public{Iopinion/archives/ebbb/ebs}177{Ien.pdf, Brussels, Belgium}}
  • Goklany IM (2002) From precautionary principle to risk-risk analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 20: 1075 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Gonzalez A (2005) Territory, autonomy and defending maize. Seedling (January): 14–17
  • Goodman MM (2004) Plant breeding requirements for applied molecular biology. Crop Sci. 44: 1913–1914 [CrossRef]
  • Gould F (1998) Sustainability of transgenic insecticidal cultivars: integrating pest genetics and ecology. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 43: 701–726 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Gould F, Cohen MB (2000) Sustainable use of genetically modified crops in developing countries. In Persley G, Lantin M, eds, Agricultural biotechnology and the poor: an international conference. CGIAR (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research), Washington, DC, pp 139–146
  • Hallman WK, Hebden WC, Cuite CL, Aquino HL, Lang JT (2004) Americans and GM food: Knowledge, opinion and interest in 2004. Food Policy Institute, Cook College, Rutgers – The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
  • Hardaker JB, Huirne RBM, Anderson JR (1997) Coping with risk in agriculture. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK
  • Heisey PW, Edmeades GO (1999) Part 1. Maize production in drought-stressed environments: technical options and research resource allocation. In CIMMYT, ed, World maize facts and trends 1997/98. CIMMYT, Mexico, DF, pp 1–36
  • Hernández Xolocotzi E (1985) Maize and man in the greater southwest. Econ. Bot. 39: 416–430 [CrossRef]
  • Hilbeck A, Andow DA, eds (2004) A case study of Bt maize in Kenya. CABI, Wallingford, Osfordshire, UK
  • Huang J, Hu R, Pray C, Qiao F, Rozelle S (2003) Biotechnology as an alternative to chemical pesticides: a case study of Bt cotton in China. Agric. Econ. 29: 55–67 [CrossRef]
  • Huang JK, Hu RF, Rozelle S, Pray C (2005) Insect-resistant GM rice in farmers’ fields: Assessing productivity and health effects in China. Science 308: 688–690 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • INEGI (1996) Anuario Estadístico del Estado de Oaxaca, Edición 1996. INEGI, Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico
  • INEGI (2001) Sistema para la consulta del annuario estadístico. INEGI, Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico
  • INEGI (2005) Indicadores del XII censo general de población y vivienda 2000. Mexico. 2005. 2 August 2005. http://www.inegi.gob.mx/est/default.asp?c=5171
  • Instituto Nacional de Economia (2004) IV Censo Nacional Agropecuario 2003. INE, Guatemala
  • James C (2004) Preview: global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2004. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA. http://www.isaaa.org/kc/CBTNews/press_release/briefs32/ESummary/Executive%20Summary%20(English).pdf
  • Kenward K, Brandle J, McPherson J, Davies P (1999) Type II fish antifreeze protein accumulation in transgenic tobacco does not confer frost resistance. Transgenic Res. 8: 105–117 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Klinger T (2002) Variability and uncertainty in crop-to-wild hybridization. In Letourneau DK, Elpern Burrows B, eds, Genetically engineered organisms: assessing environmental and human health effects. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 1–15
  • Louette D, Charrier A, Berthaud J (1997) In situ conservation of maize in Mexico: genetic diversity and maize seed management in a traditional community. Econ. Bot. 51: 20–38 [CrossRef]
  • Louette D, Smale M (2000) Farmers’ seed selection practices and maize variety characteristics in a traditional Mexican community. Euphytica 113: 25–41 [CrossRef]
  • Luna VS, Figueroa J, Baltazar MB, Gomez LR, Townsend R, Shoper JB (2001) Maize pollen longevity and distance isolation requirements for effective pollen control. Crop Sci. 41: 1551–1557 [CrossRef]
  • Ma BL, Subedi KD, Reid LM (2004) Extent of cross-fertilization in maize by pollen from neighboring transgenic hybrids. Crop Sci. 44: 1273–1282 [CrossRef]
  • Matsuoka Y, Vigouroux Y, Goodman MM, Sanchez GJ, Buckler E, Doebley J (2002) A single domestication for maize shown by multilocus microsatellite genotyping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 6080–6084 [CrossRef]
  • Messeguer J (2003) Gene flow assessment in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 73: 201–212 [CrossRef]
  • Millennium Project (2005) Halving hunger: it can be done. Earthscan, London
  • Monsanto Company (2004) Growing options. Monsanto 2004 pledge report. St Louis, Missouri: Monstanto Company. 2004. November 9. http://www.monsanto.com/monsanto/content/media/pubs/2004/pledgereport.pdf
  • Mora JE (2005) Central America: UN agency accused of distributing GM foods: Inter Press Service News Agency. 2005. June 23. http://ipsnews.net/new_nota.asp?idnews= 27498
  • Morris ML (1998) Maize seed industries in developing countries. Lynne Rienner, Boulder, Colorado
  • Murphy K, Lammer D, Lyon S, Carter B, Jones SS (2005) Breeding for organic and low-input farming systems: An evolutionary-participatory breeding method for inbred cereal grains. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 20: 48–55 [CrossRef]
  • Nadal A (2000) The environmental and social impacts of economic liberalization on corn production in Mexico. World Wide Fund for Nature, and Oxfam GB, Gland, Switzerland, and Oxford, UK
  • Narayanan S, Gulati A (2002) Globalization and the smallholders: a review of issues, approaches, and implications. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC
  • Nelson KC, Kibata G, Muhammad L, Okuro JO, Muyekho F, Odinho M, Ely A, Waquil JM (2004) Problem formulation and options assessment (PFOA) for genetically modified organisms: The Kenya case study. In Hilbeck A, Andow DA, eds, Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms, Volume 1: A case study of Bt maize in Kenya. CAB International, Walingford, UK, pp 57–82
  • NRC (1996) Understanding risk: informing decisions in a democratic society. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
  • NRC (2002) Environmental effects of transgenic plants: the scope and adequacy of regulation. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
  • NRC (2004) Biological confinement of genetically engineered organisms, Washington, DC
  • Ortiz-García S, Ezcurra E, Schoel B, Acevedo F, Soberón J, Snow AA (2005) Absence of detectable transgenes in local landraces of maize in Oaxaca, Mexico (2003-2004). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 12338–12343 [CrossRef]
  • Pressoir G, Berthaud J (2004) Patterns of population structure in maize landraces from the Central Valleys of Oaxaca in Mexico. Heredity 92: 88–94 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Quist D, Chapela IH (2001) Transgenic DNA introgressed into traditional maize landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico. Nature 414: 541–543 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • SAGARPA (2004) Producción agrícola, año 2003, Servicio de información y estadística agroalimentaria y pesquera (SIAP). Mexico: SAGARPA. 2005. 2 August 2005. http://www. sagarpa.gob.mx
  • SAS Institute (2001) SAS System for Windows. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina
  • Simmonds NW, Smartt J (1999) Principles of crop improvement. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, UK
  • Snow AA, Andow DA, Gepts P, Hallerman EM, Power A, Tiedje JM, Wolfenbarger LL (2005) Genetically engineered organisms and the environment: Current status and recommendations. Ecol. Appl. 15: 377–404 [CrossRef]
  • Soleri D, Cleveland DA (2005) Scenarios as a tool for eliciting and understanding farmers’ biological knowledge. Field Methods 17: 283–301 [CrossRef]
  • Soleri D, Cleveland DA, Smith SE, Ceccarelli S, Grando S, Rana RB, Rijal D, Ríos Labrada H (2002) Understanding farmers’ knowledge as the basis for collaboration with plant breeders: methodological development and examples from ongoing research in Mexico, Syria, Cuba, and Nepal. In Cleveland DA, Soleri D, eds, Farmers, scientists and plant breeding: integrating knowledge and practice. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, pp 19–60
  • Soleri D, Smith SE, Cleveland DA (2000) Evaluating the potential for farmer and plant breeder collaboration: a case study of farmer maize selection in Oaxaca, Mexico. Euphytica 116: 41–57 [CrossRef]
  • Storer NP (2003) Sensitivity analysis of a spatially-explicit stochastic simulation model of the evolution of resitance in Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to Bt transgenic corn and cotton. J. Econ. Entomol. 96: 173–187 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Thirtle C, Beyers L, Ismael Y (2003) Can GM-Technologies Help the Poor? The Impact of Bt Cotton in Makhathini Flats, KwaZulu-Natal. World Develop. 31: 717–732 [CrossRef]
  • Traxler G, Godoy-Avila S (2004) Transgenic cotton in Mexico. AgBioForum 7: 57–62
  • USDA FAS (2005) FAS Online US Trade Internet System
  • USDA NASS (2004) Crop Production-Prospective Planting-Supplement. 2004. nov 9. http://www.nass.usda.gov/census/census02/volume1/us/st99_1_001_001.pdf
  • Walker TS (1989) Yield and household income variability in India’s semi-arid tropics. In Anderson JR, Hazell PBR, eds, Variability in Grain Yields: Implications for agricultural research and policy in developing countries. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, pp 309– 319
  • Yang PY, Iles M, Yan S, Jolliffe F (2005) Farmers’ knowledge, perceptions and practices in transgenic Bt cotton in small producer systems in Northern China. Crop Prot. 24: 229–239 [CrossRef]
  • Zeven AC (1998) Landraces: a review of definitions and classifications. Euphytica 104: 127–139 [CrossRef]
  • Zhong G-Y (2001) Genetic issues and pitfalls in transgenic breeding. Euphytica 118: 137–144 [CrossRef]
  • Zhu YY, Chen HR, Fan JH, Wang YY, Li Y, Chen JB, Fan JX, Yang SS, Hu LP, Leung H, Mew TW, Teng PS, Wang ZH, Mundt CC (2000) Genetic diversity and disease control in rice. Nature 406: 718–722 [CrossRef] [PubMed]