EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 4 / No 3 (July-September 2005) Environ. Biosafety Res., 4 3 (2005) 127-140 References
Free Access
Issue
Environ. Biosafety Res.
Volume 4, Number 3, July-September 2005
Page(s) 127 - 140
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2005018
Published online 16 March 2006
  • APHIS (Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service) (1987) 7 CFR Parts 330 and 340, Plant pests; introduction of genetically engineered organisms or products; final rule. Fed. Register 52: 22892–22915 [Google Scholar]
  • Barrett KL, Grandy N, Harrison EG, Hassan S, Oomen P (1994) Guidance Document on Regulatory Testing Procedures for Pesticides with Non-Target Arthropods. Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Brussels [Google Scholar]
  • Bedford ID, Briddon RW, Brown JK, Rosell RC, Markham PG (1994) Geminivirus transmission and biological characterisation of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) biotypes from different geographic regions. Ann. Appl. Biol. 125: 311–325 [Google Scholar]
  • Bergelson J (1994) Changes in fecundity do not predict invasiveness – a model study of transgenic plants. Ecology 75: 249–252 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bergelson J, Purrington CB, Wichmann G (1998) Promiscuity in transgenic plants. Nature 395: 25 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bing DJ, Downey RK, Rakow G (1996) Hybridizations among Brassica napus, B.rapa, and B. juncea and their weedy relatives B. nigra and Sinapis arvensis under open pollination conditions in the field. Plant Breed. 115: 470–473 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Burban C, Fishpool LDC, Fauquet C, Fargette D, Thouvenel J-C (1992) Host associated biotypes within West African populations of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) (Hom., Aleyrodidae). J. Appl. Ent. 113: 416–423 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Butler D, Reichhardt A (1999) Long-term effect of GM crops serves up food for thought. Nature 398: 654–656 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Candolfi MP, Barrett KL, Campbell PJ, Forster R, Grandy N, Huet M-C, Lewis G, Oomen PA, Schmuck R, Vogt H (2000) Guidance Document on Regulatory Testing and Risk Assessment Procedures for Plant Protection products with Non-Target Arthropods. Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Pensacola, FL [Google Scholar]
  • Chèvre AM, Eber F, Baranger A, Boucherie A, Broucqsault LM, Bouchet Y, Renard M (1998) Risk assessment on crucifer species. Acta Hort. 459: 219–224 [Google Scholar]
  • Chèvre AM, Ammitzboll H, Breckling B, Dietz-Pfeilstetter A, Eber F, Fargue A, Gomez-Campo C, Jenczewski E, Jørgensen R, Lavigne C, Meier MS, den Nijs HCM, Pascher K, Séguin-Swartz G, Sweet J, Stewart Jr CN, Warwick S (2004) A review on interspecific gene flow from oilseed rape to wild relatives. In den Nijs HCM, Bartsch D, Sweet J, eds, Introgression from Genetically Modified plants into Wild Relatives. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 235–251 [Google Scholar]
  • Cooper JI, Jones AT (1983) Responses of plants to viruses: proposals for the use of terms. Phytopathology 73: 127–128 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cooper JI, Raybould AF (1997) Transgenes for stress tolerance: consequences for weed evolution. Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference – Weeds, pp 265–272 [Google Scholar]
  • Cooper JI, Walsh JA (2003) Genetic modification of disease resistance, viral pathogens. In Thomas B, Murphy D, Murray B, eds, Encyclopedia of Applied Plant Sciences. Academic Press, London, UK, pp 257–262 [Google Scholar]
  • Cross FB (1996) Paradoxical perils of the precautionary principle. Wash. & L. Law Rev. 53: 851–925 [Google Scholar]
  • Dinant S, Blaise F, Kusiak C, Astier-Manifacier S, Albouy J (1993) Heterologous resistance to potato virus Y in transgenic tobacco plants expressing the coat protein of lettuce mosaic potyvirus. Phytopathology 83: 818–824 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dinant S, Maisonneuve B, Albouy J, Chupeau Y, Chupeau M-C, Bellec Y, Gaudefroy F, Kusiak C, Souche, S, Robaglia C, Lot H (1997) Coat protein gene-mediated protection in Lactuca sativa against lettuce mosaic potyvirus strains. Mol. Breeding 3: 75–86 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dutton A, Romeis J, Bigler F (2003) Assessing the risks of insect resistant plants on entomophagous arthropods: Bt-maize expressing Cry1Ab as a case study. BioControl 48: 611– 636 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ellstrand NC (2001) When transgenes wander, should we worry? Plant Physiol. 125: 1543–1545 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ellstrand NC, Prentice HC, Hancock JF (1999) Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 539–563 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Elvin DE, Welsh R, Batie SS, Capentier CL (2003) Towards an ecological systems approach in public research for environmental regulation of transgenic crops. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 99: 1–14 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • EPPO (2003) Environmental risk assessment scheme for plant protection products. EPPO Bull. 33: 103–111 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gray AJ (2004) Ecology and government policies: the GM crop debate. J. Appl. Ecol. 41: 1–10 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hails RS, Morley K (2005) Genes invading new populations: a risk assessment perspective. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20: 245–252 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hansen LB, Siegismund HR, Jørgensen RB (2001) Introgression between oilseed rape Brassica napus L. and its weedy relative B. rapa in a natural population. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 48: 621–627 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heritage J (2003) Will GM rapeseed cut the mustard? Science 302: 401–403 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hill RA, Sendashonga C (2003) General principles for risk assessment of living modified organisms: lessons from chemical assessment. Environ. Biosafety Res. 2: 81–88 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jan FJ, Fagoaga C, Pang SZ, Gonsalves D (2000) A single transgene derived from two distinct viruses confers multi-virus resistance in transgenic plants through homology-dependent gene silencing. J. Gen. Virol. 81: 2103–2109 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lehmann P, Walsh JA, Jenner CE, Kozubek E, Greenland A (1996) Genetically engineered protection against turnip mosaic virus infection in transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus var. oleifera). J. Appl. Gen. 37A: 118–121 [Google Scholar]
  • Maskell LC, Raybould AF, Cooper JI, Edwards M-L, Gray AJ (1999) Effects of turnip mosaic virus and turnip yellow mosaic virus on the survival, growth and reproduction of wild cabbage (Brassica oleracea). Ann. Appl. Biol. 135: 401–407 [Google Scholar]
  • Miller HI, Conko G (2005) NGO war on biotechnology. J. Commer. Biotech. 11: 209–222 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mitchell CE, Power AG (2003) Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421: 625–627 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mitchell ND, Richards AJ (1979) Biological Flora of the British Isles No 145, Brassica oleracea ssp. oleracea. J. Ecol. 67: 1087–1096 [Google Scholar]
  • Naranjo SE, Head G, Dively GP (2005) Field studies assessing arthropod nontarget effects in Bt transgenic crops: introduction. Environ. Ent. 34: 1178–1180 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Newman NC (1998) Fundamentals of Ecotoxicology. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI [Google Scholar]
  • Pallett DW, Thurston MI, Cortina-Borja M, Edwards M-L, Alexander M, Mitchell E, Raybould AF, Cooper JI (2002) The incidence of viruses in wild Brassica rapa ssp. sylvestris in Southern England. Ann. Appl. Biol. 141: 163–170 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Peters RH (1991) A Critique for Ecology. Cambridge University Press [Google Scholar]
  • Pimentel D, McNair S, Janecka J, Wightman J, Simmonds C, O’Connell C, Wong E, Russel L, Zern J, Aquino T, Tsomondo T (2001) Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal, and microbe invasions. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 84: 1–20 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Poppy G (2000) GM crops: environmental risks and non-target effects. Trends Plant Sci. 5: 4–6 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Preston CD, Pearman DA, Dines TD (2002) New Atlas of the British & Irish Flora. Oxford University Press [Google Scholar]
  • Raybould AF (2004) A decade of gene flow research: improved risk assessments or missed opportunities? Aspects Appl. Biol. 74: 27–33 [Google Scholar]
  • Raybould AF (2005) Assessing the environmental risks of transgenic volunteer weeds. In Gressel J, ed., Crop Ferality and Volunteerism. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 389– 401 [Google Scholar]
  • Raybould AF, Gray AJ (1993) Genetically modified crops and hybridization with wild relatives: a UK perspective. J. Appl. Ecol. 30: 199–219 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Raybould AF, Gray AJ (1994) Will hybrids of genetically modified crops invade natural communities? Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 85–89 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Raybould AF, Wilkinson MJ (2005) Assessing the environmental risks of gene flow from genetically modified crops to wild relatives. In Poppy GM, Wilkinson MJ, eds, Gene Flow from GM Plants. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp 169–185 [Google Scholar]
  • Raybould AF, Maskell LC, Edwards M-L, Cooper JI, Gray AJ (1999a) The prevalence and spatial distribution of viruses in natural populations of Brassica oleracea. New Phytol. 141: 265–275 [Google Scholar]
  • Raybould AF, Moyes CL, Maskell LC, Mogg RJ, Warman EA, Wardlaw JC, Elmes GW, Edwards M-L, Cooper JI, Clarke RT, Gray AJ (1999b) Predicting the ecological impacts of transgenes for insect and virus resistance in natural and feral populations of Brassica species. In Ammann K, Jacot Y, Simonsen V, Kjellsson G, eds, Methods of Risk Assessment of Transgenic Plants III. Ecological risks and prospects of transgenic plants. Bïrkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp 3–15 [Google Scholar]
  • Raybould AF, Edwards M-L, Clarke RT, Pallett D, Cooper JI (2000) Heritable variation for the control of turnip mosaic virus and cauliflower mosaic virus replication in wild cabbage. Beiträge zur Züchtungsforschung – Bundesanstalt für Züchtungsforschung an Kulturpflanzen. Proceedings of the 7th Aschersleben Symposium – New Aspects of Resistance Research on Cultivated Plants, pp 4–8 [Google Scholar]
  • Raybould AF, Alexander MJ, Mitchell E, Thurston MI, Pallett DW, Hunter P, Walsh JA, Edwards M-L, Jones AME, Moyes CL, Gray AJ, Cooper JI (2003) The ecology of turnip mosaic virus in populations of wild Brassica species. In Beringer J, Godfray CHJ, Hails RA, eds, Ecological Dynamics & Genes, final symposium volume. Blackwell Scientific Press, Oxford, UK, pp 226–244 [Google Scholar]
  • Rich TCG (1991) Crucifers of Great Britain and Ireland. London: Botanical Society of the British Isles [Google Scholar]
  • Scheffler JA, Dale PJ (1994) Opportunities for gene transfer from transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus) to related species. Transgenic Res. 3: 263–278 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shattuck VI (1992) The biology, epidemiology and control of turnip mosaic virus. Offprints from Plant Breeding Reviews 14: 199–238 [Google Scholar]
  • Thurston MI, Pallett DW, Cortina-Borja M, Edwards M-L, Raybould AF, Cooper JI (2001) The incidence of viruses in wild Brassica nigra in Dorset (UK). Ann. Appl. Biol. 139: 277–284 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • U N (1935) Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and the peculiar mode of fertilization. Shokub utsu Kekyu Zasshi. 7: 389–452 [Google Scholar]
  • US EPA (2001) Biopesticides Registration Action Document – Bacillus thuringiensis Plant Incorporated Protectants. http://www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/biopesticides/pips/bt_brald.htm [Google Scholar]
  • Wilkinson MJ, Davenport IJ, Charters YM, Jones AE, Allainguillaume J, Butler HT, Mason DC, Raybould AF (2000) A direct regional scale estimate of transgene movement from GM oilseed rape to its wild progenitors. Mol. Ecol. 9: 983–991 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wilkinson MJ, Elliot LJ, Allainguillaume J, Shaw MW, Norris C, Welters R, Alexander M, Sweet J, Mason DC (2003a) Hybridization between Brassica napus and B. rapa on a national scale in the United Kingdom. Science 302: 457–459 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wilkinson MJ, Sweet J, Poppy G (2003b) Risk assessment of GM plants: avoiding gridlock? Trends Plant Sci. 8: 208–212 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]