EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 9 / No 3 (July-September 2010) Environ. Biosafety Res., 9 3 (2010) 113-121 References
Free Access
Review
Issue
Environ. Biosafety Res.
Volume 9, Number 3, July-September 2010
Page(s) 113 - 121
Section Review
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr/2011108
Published online 19 August 2011
  • Albajes R, Lumbierres B, Pons X (2009) Responsiveness of arthropod herbivores and their natural enemies to modified weed management in corn. Environ. Entomol. 38: 944–954 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Barros E, Lezar S, Anttonen MJ, van Dijk JP, Röhlig RM, Kok EJ, Engel KH (2010) Comparison of two GM maize varieties with a near-isogenic non-GM variety using transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics. Plant Biotechnol. J. 8: 436–451 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Batista R, Saibo N, Lourenço T, Oliveira MM (2008) Microarray analyses reveal that plant mutagenesis may induce more transcriptomic changes than transgene insertion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 3640–3645 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bockstael O, Chtarto A, Wakkinen J, Yang X, Melas C, Levivier M, Brotchi J, Tenenbaum L (2008) Differential transgene expression profiles in rat brain, using rAAV2/1 vectors with tetracycline-inducible and cytomegalovirus promoters. Hum. Gene Ther. 19: 1293–1305 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brandon EF, Hermsen HP, van Eijkeren JC, Tiesjema B (2010) Effect of administration route on the biodistribution and shedding of replication-deficient AAV2: a qualitative modeling approach. Curr. Gene Ther. 10: 91–106 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Davies HV, Shepherd LV, Stewart D, Frank T, Röhlig RM, Engel KH (2010) Metabolome variability in crop plant species –when, where, how much and so what? Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 58: S54–S61 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Di Castri F (1992) L’écologie en temps réel. In Theys J, Kalaora B, eds, La terre outragée. Les experts sont formels ! Autrement, Paris [Google Scholar]
  • Dirks RHG, Van Dun CMP, Reinink K, inventors (2003) Reverse Breeding, World Intellectual Property Organization WO/2003/017753 [Google Scholar]
  • Dirks R, van Dun K, de Snoo CB, van den Berg M, Lelivelt CL, Voermans W, Woudenberg L, de Wit JP, Reinink K, Schut JW, van der Zeeuw E, Vogelaar A, Freymark G, Gutteling EW, Keppel MN, van Drongelen P, Kieny M, Ellul P, Touraev A, Ma H, de Jong H, Wijnker E (2009) Reverse breeding: a novel breeding approach based on engineered meiosis. Plant Biotechnol. J. 7: 837–845 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Duque S, Joussemet B, Riviere C, Marais T, Dubreil L, Douar AM, Fyfe J, Moullier P, Colle MA, Barkats M (2009) Intravenous administration of self-complementary AAV9 enables transgene delivery to adult motor neurons. Mol. Ther. 17: 1187–1196 [Google Scholar]
  • EC (2001) Council Directive 2001/18/EC of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union L106: 1–38 [Google Scholar]
  • EC (2009) Directive 2009/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on the contained use of genetically modified micro-organisms. Official Journal of the European Union L 125: 75–97 [Google Scholar]
  • EFSA (2010) Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants. EFSA Journal8: 1879 [Google Scholar]
  • Frank T, Nörenberg S, Engel KH (2009) Metabolite profiling of two novel low phytic acid (lpa) soybean mutants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 57: 6408–6416 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hadaczek P, Forsayeth J, Mirek H, Munson K, Bringas J, Pivirotto P, McBride JL, Davidson BL, Bankiewicz KS (2009) Transduction of nonhuman primate brain with adeno-associated virus serotype 1: vector trafficking and immune response. Hum. Gene Ther. 20: 225–237 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Henderson IR, Jacoben SE (2007) Epigenetic inheritance in plants. Nature 447: 418-424 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Johannes F, Porcher E, Teixeira FK, Saliba-Colombani V, Simon M (2009) Assessing the impact of transgenerational epigenetic variation on complex traits. PLoS Genet. 5: e1000530 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kogel KH, Voll LM, Schäfer P, Jansen C, Wu Y, Langen G, Imani J, Hofmann J, Schmiedl A, Sonnewald S, von Wettstein D, Cook RJ, Sonnewald U (2010) Transcriptome and metabolome profiling of field-grown transgenic barley lack induced differences but show cultivar-specific variances. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 6198–6203 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nap J-P, van Kessel AG (2006) Epigenetics in context, COGEM literature report 2006-05. www.cogem.net/ContentFiles/CGM2006-05-EpigeneticsInContext.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • NIH (1976) Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules. National Institutes of Health, Donald S. Fredrickson papers. http://www.nih.gov/ [Google Scholar]
  • OECD (1986) Recombinant DNA safety considerations, Paris. http://www.oecd.org/ [Google Scholar]
  • Perry JN, Ter Braak CJ, Dixon PM, Duan JJ, Hails RS, Huesken A, Lavielle M, Marvier M, Scardi M, Schmidt K, Tothmeresz B, Schaarschmidt F, van der Voet H (2009) Statistical aspects of environmental risk assessment of GM plants for effects on non-target organisms. Environ. Biosafety Res. 8: 65–78 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Perry JN, Devos Y, Arpaia S, Bartsch D, Gathmann A, Hails RS, Kiss J, Lheureux K, Manachini B, Mestdagh S, Neemann G, Ortego F, Schiemann J, Sweet JB (2010) A mathematical model of exposure of non-target Lepidoptera to Bt-maize pollen expressing Cry1Ab within Europe. Proc. Biol. Sci. 277: 1417–1425 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rauschen S, Eckert J, Schaarschmidt F, Schuphan I, Gathmann A (2008) An evaluation of methods for assessing the impacts of Bt-maize MON810 cultivation and pyrethroid insecticide use on Auchenorrhyncha (Planthoppers and Leafhoppers). Agric. For. Entomol. 10: 331-339 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rauschen S, Schultheis E, Pagel-Wieder S, Schuphan I, Eber S (2009) Impact of Bt-corn MON88017 in comparison to three conventional lines on Trigonotylus caelestialium (Kirkaldy) (Heteroptera: Miridae) field densities. Transgenic Research 18: 203–214 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rauschen S, Schaarschmidt F, Gathmann A (2010) Occurrence and field densities of Coleoptera in the maize herb layer: implications for Environmental Risk Assessment of genetically modified Bt-maize. Transgenic Res. 19: 727–744 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Raybould A (2006) Problem formulation and hypothesis testing for environmental risk assessments of genetically modified crops. Environ. Biosafety Res. 5: 119–125 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Raybould A (2007) Ecological and ecotoxicological methods for assessing the environmental risks of transgenic crops. Plant Sci. 173: 589-602 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reinders J, Wulff-Brande BH, Mirouze M, Mari-Ordonez A, Dapp M, Razhan W, Bucher E, Theiler G, Paskowski J (2009) Compromised stability of DNA methylation and transposon immobilization in mosaic Arabidopsis epigenomes. Genes Dev. 8: 939-950 [Google Scholar]
  • Richards EJ (2006) Inherited epigenetic variation – revisiting soft inheritance. Nature Rev. Genet. 7: 395-401 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Röhlig RM, Engel KH (2010) Influence of the input system (conventional versus organic farming) on metabolite profiles of maize (Zea mays) kernels. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58: 3022–3030 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Romeis J, Bartsch D, Bigler F, Candolfi MP, Gielkens MM, Hartley SE, Hellmich RL, Huesing JE, Jepson PC, Layton R, Quemada H, Raybould A, Rose RI, Schiemann J, Sears MK, Shelton AM, Sweet J, Vaituzis Z, Wolt JD (2008) Assessment of risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops to nontarget arthropods. Nat. Biotechnol. 26: 203–208 [Google Scholar]
  • Samulski RJ, Berns KI, Tan M, Muzyczka N (1982) Cloning of adeno-associated virus into pBR322: rescue of intact virus from the recombinant plasmid in human cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79: 2077–2081 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • SCBD (2000) Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity: text and annexes, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal [Google Scholar]
  • Steidler L, Hans W, Schotte L, Neirynck S, Obermeier F, Falk W, Fiers W, Remaut E (2000) Treatment of murine colitis by Lactococcus lactis secreting interleukin-10. Science 289: 1352–1355 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Steidler L, Neirynck S, Huyghebaert N, Snoeck V, Vermeire A, Goddeeris B, Cox E, Remon JP, Remaut E (2003) Biological containment of genetically modified Lactococcus lactis for intestinal delivery of human interleukin 10. Nat. Biotechnol. 21: 785–789 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tenenbaum L, Jurysta F, Stathopoulos A, Puschban Z, Melas C, Hermens WT, Verhaagen J, Pichon B, Velu T, Levivier M (2000) Tropism of AAV-2 vectors for neurons of the globus pallidus. Neuroreport 11: 2277–2283 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tiesjema B, Hermsen HP, van Eijkeren JC, Brandon EF (2010) Effect of administration route on the biodistribution and shedding of replication-deficient HAdV-5: a qualitative modelling approach. Curr. Gene Ther. 10: 107–127 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • van Dijk JP, Leifert C, Barros E, Kok EJ (2010) Gene expression profiling for food safety assessment: examples in potato and maize. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 58: S21–S25 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wolt JD, Keese P, Raybould A, Fitzpatrick JW, Burachik M, Gray A, Olin SS, Schiemann J, Sears M, Wu F (2010) Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants. Transgenic Res. 19: 425–436 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]