EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 9 / No 3 (July-September 2010) Environ. Biosafety Res., 9 3 (2010) 147-154 References
Open Access
Issue
Environ. Biosafety Res.
Volume 9, Number 3, July-September 2010
Page(s) 147 - 154
Section Case study
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr/2011100
Published online 25 March 2011
  • Burris JS (2001) Adventitious pollen intrusion into hybrid maize seed production fields. Proc. 56th Annual Corn and Sorghum Research Conference 2001, American Seed Trade Association, Inc., Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  • Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983) A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1: 19–21 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Devos Y, Reheul D, De Schrijver A (2005) The co-existence between transgenic and non-transgenic maize in the European Union: a focus on pollen flow and cross-fertilization. Environ. Biosafety Res. 4: 71–87 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Devos Y, Demont M, Dillen K, Reheul D, Kaiser M, Sanvido O (2009) Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-GM crops in the European Union. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 29: 11–30 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Doebley J (1990) Molecular evidence for gene flow among Zea species-genes transformed into maize through genetic-engineering would be transferred to its wild relatives, the teosintes. Bioscience 40: 443–448 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Emberlin J, Adams-Groom B, Tidmarsh J (1999) A report on the dispersal of maize pollen. National Pollen Research Unit, University College, Worcester. Report commissioned by and available from the Soil Association, Bristol House, Bristol, 40–56 [Google Scholar]
  • FAO/WHO (2002) Consideration of methods for the detection and identification of foods derived from biotechnology. Methods submitted by the ad-hoc intergovernmental task force on foods derived from biotechnology. Codex Alimentarius Commission. Budapest, Hungary, 36 p [Google Scholar]
  • INASE (2008) Available at http://www.inase.org.uy [Google Scholar]
  • Jørgensen RB, Wilkinson MJ (2005) Rare hybrids and methods for their detection. In Poppy GM, Wilkinson MJ, eds, Gene flow from GM plants, Blackwell, Oxford, pp 113–142 [Google Scholar]
  • Langhof M, Hommel B, Hüsken A, Njontie C, Schiemann J, Wehling P, Wilhelm R, Rühl G (2010) Coexistence in maize: isolation distance in dependence on conventional maize field depth and separate edge harvest. Crop Sci. 50: 1496–1508 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Luna S, Figueroa J, Baltazar B, Gomez R, Townsend R, Schoper JB (2001) Maize pollen longevity and distance isolation requirements for effective pollen control. Crop Sci. 41: 1551–1557 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ma BL, Subedi KD, Reid LM (2004) Extent of cross-fertilization in maize by pollen from neighboring transgenic hybrids. Crop Sci. 44: 1273–1282 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Messeguer J, Penas G, Ballester J, Bas M, Serra J, Salvia J (2006) Pollen-mediated geneflow in maize in real situations of coexistence. Plant Biotech. J. 4: 633–645 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • MGAP (2008) Encuesta Agrícola “Invierno 2008” DIEA, Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca, Uruguay. Available at www.mgap.gub.uy [Google Scholar]
  • Montesinos López OA, Montesinos López A, Crossa J, Eskridge K, Hernández Suárez CM, (2010) Sample size for detecting and estimating the proportion of transgenic plants with narrow confidence intervals. Seed Sc. Res. 20: 123–136 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Piñeyro-Nelson A, van Heerwaarden J, Perales HR, Serratos-Hernández JA, Rangel A, Hufford MB, Gepts P, Garay-Arroyo A, Rivera Bustamante R, Alvarez Buylla ER, (2009) Transgenes in Mexican maize: molecular evidence and methodological considerations for GMO detection in landrace populations. Mol. Ecol. 18: 750–761 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Presidential decree 353/08. Available at: http://www.mvotma.gub.uy/dinama/ [Google Scholar]
  • Riesgo L, Areal FJ, Sanvido O, Rodriguez-Cerezo E (2010) Statistical analysis of distances needed to limit cross-fertilization between genetically modified and conventional maize in Europe. Nature Biotech. 28: 780–782 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sanguinetti CJ, Dias Neto E, Simpson AJG (1994) Rapid silver staining and recovery of PCR products separated on polyacrylamide gels. Biotechniques 17: 915–919 [Google Scholar]
  • Sanou J, Gouesnard B, Charrier A (1997) Isozymes variability in West African maize cultivars (Zea mays L.). Maydica 42: 1–11 [Google Scholar]
  • Sanvido O, Widmer F, Winzeler M, Streit B, Szerencsits E, Bigler F (2008) Definition and feasibility of isolation distances for transgenic maize cultivation. Transgenic Res. 17: 317–335 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Weber WE, Bringezu T, Broer I, Eder J, Holz F (2007) Coexistence between GM and non-GM maize crops – Tested in 2004 at the field scale level (Erprobungsanbau 2004). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 193: 79–92 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weekes R, Allnutt T, Boffey C, Morgan S, Bilton M, Daniels R, Henry C (2007) A study of crop-to-crop gene flow using farm scale sites of fodder maize (Zea mays L.) in the UK. Transgenic Res. 16: 203–211 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]