EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 7 / No 2 (April-June 2008) Environ. Biosafety Res., 7 2 (2008) 97-104 References
Free Access
Issue
Environ. Biosafety Res.
Volume 7, Number 2, April-June 2008
Page(s) 97 - 104
Section Case Study
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2008004
Published online 16 April 2008
  • Bannert M, Stamp P (2007) Cross-pollination of maize at long distance. Eur. J. Agron. 27: 44–51 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Beckmann V, Soregaroli C, Wesseler J (2006) Coexistence rules and regulations in the European Union. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 88: 1193–1199 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bock A-K, Lheureux K, Libeau-Dulos M, Nilsagård H, Rodríguez-Cerezo E (2002) Scenarios for co-existence of genetically modified, conventional and organic crops in European agriculture. http://ftp.jrc.es/eur20394en.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Castellazzi MS, Perry JN, Colbach N, Monod H, Adamczyk K, Viaud V, Conrad KF (2007) New measures and tests of temporal and spatial pattern of crops in agricultural landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 118: 339–349 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • De Schrijver A, Devos Y, Van den Bulcke M, Cadot P, De Loose M, Reheul D, Sneyers M (2007) Risk assessment of GM stacked events obtained from crosses between GM events. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 18: 101–109 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Della Porta G, Ederle D, Bucchini L, Prandi M, Verderio A, Pozzi C (2008) Maize pollen mediated gene flow in the Po valley (Italy): source-recipient distance and effect of flowering time. Eur. J. Agron. 28: 255–265 [Google Scholar]
  • Demont M, Daems W, Dillen K, Mathijs E, Sausse C, Tollens E (2008) Regulating coexistence in Europe: Beware of the domino-effect! Ecol. Econ. 64: 683–689 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Devos Y, Reheul D, De Schrijver A (2005) The co-existence between transgenic and non-transgenic maize in the European Union: a focus on pollen flow and cross-fertilization. Environ. Biosafety Res. 4: 71–87 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Devos Y, Cougnon M, Thas O, De Clercq EM, Reheul D (2007a) Recommendations to facilitate the implementation of isolation perimeters. In Stein AJ, Rodríguez-Cerezo E, eds, Book of abstracts of the 3rd International Conference on Coexistence between Genetically Modified (GM) and non-GM-based Agricultural Supply Chains, European Commission, Spain, pp 287–288 [Google Scholar]
  • Devos Y, Reheul D, Thas O, De Clercq EM, Cougnon M, Cordemans K (2007b) Implementing isolation perimeters around genetically modified maize fields. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 27: 155–165 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Devos Y, Thas O, Cougnon M, De Clercq EM, Cordemans K, Reheul D (2008) Feasibility of isolation perimeters for genetically modified maize. Agron. Sustain. Dev., DOI:10.1051/agro:2007031 [Google Scholar]
  • Dolezel M, Pascher K, Grabherr G (2005) Regionality as a key parameter for co-existence of genetically modified maize with conventional and organic maize. In Messéan A, ed, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Coexistence between Genetically Modified (GM) and non-GM-based Agricultural Supply Chains, Agropolis Productions, Montpellier, pp 203–206 [Google Scholar]
  • EC (2003a) Commission Recommendation of 23 July 2003 on guidelines for the development of national strategies and best practices to ensure the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming. Official J. European Comm. L 189: 36–47 [Google Scholar]
  • EC (2003b) Regulation (EC) 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed. Official J. European Comm. L 268: 1–23 [Google Scholar]
  • EC (2006) Report on the implementation of national measures on the co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/coexistence/sec313_en.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Ganz C, Struzyna-Schulze C, Eder J, Holz F, Schmidt K, Broer I (2007) “Erprobungsanbau 2005”: Different crops as spacers to minimize cross fertilization between GM and non-GM maize on field scale level. In Stein AJ, Rodríguez-Cerezo E, eds, Book of abstracts of the 3rd International Conference on Coexistence between Genetically Modified (GM) and non-GM-based Agricultural Supply Chains, European Commission, Spain, pp 267–268 [Google Scholar]
  • Goggi AS, Caragea P, Lopez-Sanchez H, Westgate M, Arritt R, Clark C (2006) Statistical analysis of outcrossing between adjacent maize grain production fields. Field Crop Res. 99: 147–157 [Google Scholar]
  • Gustafson DI, Brants IO, Horak MJ, Remund KM, Rosenbaum EW, Soteres JK (2006) Empirical modeling of genetically modified maize grain production practices to achieve European Union labeling thresholds. Crop Sci. 46: 2133–2140 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hüsken A, Schiemann J (2007) Impact of silage maize (Zea mays L.) on GMO quantification and coexistence. In Stein AJ, Rodríguez-Cerezo E, eds, Book of abstracts of the 3rd International Conference on Coexistence between Genetically Modified (GM) and non-GM-based Agricultural Supply Chains, European Commission, Spain, pp 357–358 [Google Scholar]
  • Hüsken A, Ammann K, Messeguer J, Papa R, Robson P, Schiemann J, Squire G, Stamp P, Sweet J, Wilhelm R (2007) A major European synthesis of data on pollen and seed mediated gene flow in maize in the SIGMEA project. In Stein AJ, Rodríguez-Cerezo E, eds, Book of abstracts of the 3rd International Conference on Coexistence between Genetically Modified (GM) and non-GM-based Agricultural Supply Chains, European Commission, Spain, pp 53–56 [Google Scholar]
  • Kraic J, Mihalčík P, Singer M, Plačková A (2007) Coexistence of genetically modified and conventional maize: practical experience on-farm in Slovakia. In Stein AJ, Rodríguez-Cerezo E, eds, Book of abstracts of the 3rd International Conference on Coexistence between Genetically Modified (GM) and non-GM-based Agricultural Supply Chains, European Commission, Spain, pp 251–252 [Google Scholar]
  • Lécroart B, Gauffreteau A, Le Bail M, Leclaire M, Messéan A (2007) Coexistence of GM and non-GM maize: effect of regional structural variables on GM dissemination risk. In Stein AJ, Rodríguez-Cerezo E, eds, Book of abstracts of the 3rd International Conference on Coexistence between Genetically Modified (GM) and non-GM-based Agricultural Supply Chains, European Commission, Spain, pp 115–118 [Google Scholar]
  • Lipsius K, Wilhelm R, Richter O, Schmalstieg KJ, Schiemann J (2006) Meteorological input data requirements to predict cross-pollination of GM maize with Lagrangian approaches. Environ. Biosafety Res. 5: 151–168 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Marvier M (2008) Pharmaceutical crops in California, benefits and risks. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 28: 1–9 [Google Scholar]
  • Mazzoncini M, Balducci E, Gorelli S, Russu R, Brunori G (2007) Coexistence scenarios between GM and GM-free corn in Tuscany region (Italy). In Stein AJ, Rodríguez-Cerezo E, eds, Book of abstracts of the 3rd International Conference on Coexistence between Genetically Modified (GM) and non-GM-based Agricultural Supply Chains, European Commission, Spain, pp 295–296 [Google Scholar]
  • Messéan A, Angevin F (2007) Coexistence measures for maize cultivation: lessons from gene flow and modeling studies. In Stein AJ, Rodríguez-Cerezo E, eds, Book of abstracts of the 3rd International Conference on Coexistence between Genetically Modified (GM) and non-GM-based Agricultural Supply Chains, European Commission, Spain, pp 23–26 [Google Scholar]
  • Messéan A, Angevin F, Gómez-Barbero M, Menrad K, Rodríguez-Cerezo E (2006) New case studies on the coexistence of GM and non-GM crops in European agriculture. http://ftp.jrc.es/eur22102en.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Messeguer J, Peñas G, Ballester J, Bas M, Serra J, Salvia J, Palaudelmàs M, Melé E (2006) Pollen-mediated gene flow in maize in real situations of coexistence. Plant Biotechnology J. 4: 633–645 [Google Scholar]
  • Messeguer J, Palaudelmàs M, Peñas G, Serra J, Salvia J, Ballester J, Bas M, Pla M, Nadal A, Melé E (2007) Three year study of a real situation of co-existence in maize. In Stein AJ, Rodríguez-Cerezo E, eds, Book of abstracts of the 3rd International Conference on Coexistence between Genetically Modified (GM) and non-GM-based Agricultural Supply Chains, European Commission, Spain, pp 93–96 [Google Scholar]
  • NIS (2008) Landbouwtelling 2007. http://www.statbel.fgov.be/downloads/cah2007mprov_nl.xls [Google Scholar]
  • Palaudelmàs M, Messeguer J, Peñas G, Serra J, Salvia J, Pla M, Nadal A, Melé E (2007) Effect of sowing and flowering dates on maize gene flow. In Stein AJ, Rodríguez-Cerezo E, eds, Book of abstracts of the 3rd International Conference on Coexistence between Genetically Modified (GM) and non-GM-based Agricultural Supply Chains, European Commission, Spain, pp 235–236 [Google Scholar]
  • Perry JN (2002) Sensitive dependencies and separation distances for genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Proc. R. Soc. Lon. B 269: 1173–1176 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pla M, La Paz J-L, Peñas G, García N, Palaudelmàs M, Esteve T, Messeguer J, Melé E (2006) Assessment of real-time PCR based methods for quantification of pollen-mediated gene flow from GM to conventional maize in a field study. Transgenic Res. 15: 219–228 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sanvido O, Widmer F, Winzeler M, Streit B, Szerencsits E, Bigler F (2008) Definition and feasibility of isolation distances for transgenic maize. Transgenic Res., DOI:10.1007/s11248-007-9103-1 [Google Scholar]
  • Schiemann J (2003) Co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming. Environ. Biosafety Res. 2: 213–217 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sicard G (2003) Management of varietal purity in seed production in France: organization and cost. In Boelt B, ed, Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on the Co-existence of Genetically Modified Crops with Conventional and Organic Crops, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Flakkebjerg, pp 57–59 [Google Scholar]
  • van de Wiel CCM, Lotz LAP (2006) Outcrossing and coexistence of genetically modified with (genetically) unmodified crops: a case study of the situation in the Netherlands. Neth. J. Agr. Sci. 54: 17–35 [Google Scholar]
  • van de Wiel CCM, Dolstra O, Thissen JTNM, Groeneveld RMW, Kok EJ, Scholtens IMJ, Smulders MJM, Lotz LAP (2007) Pollen-mediated gene flow in maize under agronomical conditions representative for the Netherlands. In Stein AJ, Rodríguez-Cerezo E, eds, Book of abstracts of the 3rd International Conference on Coexistence between Genetically Modified (GM) and non-GM-based Agricultural Supply Chains, European Commission, Spain, pp 269–270 [Google Scholar]
  • Viaud V, Monod H, Lavigne C, Angevin F, Adamczyk K (2007) Spatial sensitivity of maize gene flow to landscape patterns: a simulation approach. In Stein AJ, Rodríguez-Cerezo E, eds, Book of abstracts of the 3rd International Conference on Coexistence between Genetically Modified (GM) and non-GM-based Agricultural Supply Chains, European Commission, Spain, pp 123–126 [Google Scholar]
  • Weber WE, Bringezu T, Broer I, Holz F, Eder J (2007) Coexistence between GM and non-GM maize crops – tested in 2004 at the field scale level (Erprobungsanbau 2004). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 193: 79–92 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weekes R, Allnutt T, Boffey C, Morgan S, Bilton M, Daniels R, Henry C (2007) A study of crop-to-crop gene flow using farm scale sites of fodder maize (Zea mays L.) in the UK. Transgenic Res. 16: 203–211 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]