Free Access
Issue
Environ. Biosafety Res.
Volume 5, Number 1, January-March 2006
Page(s) 27 - 36
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2006014
Published online 19 September 2006
  • Boatman N (1994) Field Margins: Integrating Agriculture and Conservation. BCBP [Google Scholar]
  • Bryant SR, Thomas CD, Bale JS (1997) Nettle feeding nymphalid butterflies: temperature, development and distribution. Ecol. Entomol. 22: 390–398 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Caldow RWG, Racey PA (2000) Large Scale Processes in Ecology and Hydrology. J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 1–8 [Google Scholar]
  • Dale PJ, Clarke B, Fontes EMD (2002) Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops. Nat. Biotechnol. 20: 567–574 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Davis BNK, Lakhani KH, Yates TJ (1991) The hazards of insecticides to butterflies of field margins. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 36: 151–161 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • den Nijs HCN, Bartsch D (2004) Introgression of GM plants and the EU guidance note for monitoring. In den Nijs HCN, Bartsch D, Sweet J, eds, Introgression from genetically modified plants into wild relatives, CABI Publishing Cambridge, pp 365–389 [Google Scholar]
  • Dively GP, Rose R, Sears MK, Hellmich RL, Stanley-Horn DDE, Calvin DD, Russo JM, Anderson PL (2004) Effects on Monarch butterfly larvae (Lepidoptera: Danaidae) after continuous exposure to Cry1Ab-expressing corn during anthesis. Environ. Entomol. 33: 1116–1125 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ebert G, Rennwald E (1991) A. urticae. In Ebert G, Rennwald E, eds, Die Schmetterlinge Baden-Württembergs, Band 1, Tagfalter I. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, pp 391–398 [Google Scholar]
  • EFSA (2005a) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the Commission related to the notification (Reference C/F/96/05.10) for the placing on the market of insect-tolerant genetically modified maize Bt11, for cultivation, feed and industrial processing, under Part C of Directive 2001/18/EC from Syngenta Seeds. EFSA J. 213: 1–33 [Google Scholar]
  • EFSA (2005b) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the Commission related to the notification (Reference C/ES/01/01) for the placing on the market of insect-tolerant genetically modified maize 1507, for import, feed and industrial processing and cultivation, under Part C of Directive 2001/18/EC from Pioneer Hi-Bred International/Mycogen Seeds. EFSA J. (2005) 181: 1–33 [Google Scholar]
  • Eitschberger U, Reinhardt R, Steiniger H (1991) Wanderfalter in Europa (Lepidoptera) – Appeal of International Cooperation in the Research of the Migration of Insects. Atalanta 22: 18–33 [Google Scholar]
  • Evans HF (2002) Environmental Impact of Bt Exudates from Roots of Genetically Modified Plants. Defra-Report (EPG 1/5/156). http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/gm/research/pdf/epg_1-5-156.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Felke M, Langenbruch G-A (2005) Auswirkungen des Pollens von transgenem Bt-Mais auf ausgewählte Schmetterlingslarven. BfN-Skripten 157: 1–143 [Google Scholar]
  • Felke M, Lorenz N, Langenbruch G-A (2002) Laboratory studies on the effects of pollen from Bt-maize on larvae of some butterfly species. J. Appl. Entomol. 126: 320– 325 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Firbanks LG, Heard MS, Woiwod IP, Hawes C, Haughton AJ, Champion GT, Scott RJ, Hill MO, Dewar AM, Squire GR, May MJ, Brooks DR, Bohan DA, Daniels RE, Osborne JL, Roy DB, Black HIJ, Rothery P, Perry JN (2003) An introduction to the farm-scale evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. J. Appl. Ecol. 40: 2–16 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gathmann A, Wirooks L, Hothorn LA, Schuphan I (2006) Impact of Bt-pollen (MON810) on lepidopteran larvae living on accompanying weeds. Mol. Ecol. 15: 2677-2685 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hausmann A (1990) Zur Dynamik von Nachtfalter-Artenspektren: Turnover und Dispersionsverhalten als Elemente von Verbreitungsstrategien. Spixiana Suppl. 16: 1–222 [Google Scholar]
  • Hellmich RL, Siegfried BD, Sears MK, Stanley-Horn DE, Daniels MJ, Mattila HR, Spencer T, Bidne KG, Lewis LC (2001) Monarch larvae sensitivity to Bacillus thurningiensis-purified proteins and pollen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 98: 11925–11930 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hensle J (2004) Papilionidae, Pieridae, Nymphalidae und Lycaenidae 2004. Atalanta 36: 15–86 [Google Scholar]
  • Jeanneret P, Schüpbach B, Pfiffner L, Walter T (2003) Arthropod reaction to landscape and habitat features in agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecol. 18: 253–263 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jepson PC, Croft BA, Pratt GE (1994) Test systems to determine the ecological risks by toxin release from Bacillus thuringiensis genes in crop plants. Mol. Ecol. 3: 81–89 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jesse LCH, Obrycki JJ (2002) Assessment of the non-target effects of transgenic Bt corn pollen and anthers on the milkweed tiger moth Euchatias egle Drury (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 75: 55–58 [Google Scholar]
  • Krauss J, Dewnter-Steffan I, Tscharntke T (2003) Local species immigration, extinction, and turnover of butterflies in relation to habitat area and habitat isolation. Oecologia 442: 591–602 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lang A (2004) Monitoring the impact of Bt maize on butterflies in the field: estimation of required sample sizes. Environ. Biosafety Res. 3: 55–66 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lang A, Ludy C, Vojtech E (2004) Dispersion and deposition of Bt maize pollen in field margins. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 111: 417–428 [Google Scholar]
  • Longely M, Sotherton N (1997) Factors determining the effects of pesticides upon butterflies inhabiting arable farmland. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 61: 1–12 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Losey JE, Rayor LS, Carter ME (1999) Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature 399: 214 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mulder C, Aldenberg T, de Zwart D, van Wijnen JJ, Breure AM (2005) Evaluating the impact of pollution on plant-Lepidoptera relationships. Environmetrics 16: 357–373 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Niehaus M (1982) Technique for rearing the Small Tortoiseshell A. urticae without diapause at different temperatures (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Entomol. Gen. 7: 365–373 [Google Scholar]
  • Niemi GJ, McDonald ME (2004) Application of ecological indicators. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 35: 89–111 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pimentel D, Raven P (1999) Commentary: Increase in genetic engineering means less reliance on chemicals. St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 1 August 1999 B3 [Google Scholar]
  • Pleasants JM, Hellmich RL, Dively GP, Sears MK, Stanley-Horn DE, Mattila HR, Foster JE, Clark PL, Jones GD (2001) Corn pollen deposition on milk-weeds in or near cornfields. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 98: 11919–11924 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Poppy G (2000) GM crops: environmental risks and non-target effects. Trends Plant Sci. 5: 4–6 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pullin AS (1987) Changes in leaf quality following clipping and regrowth of Urtica dioica, and consequences for a specialist insect herbivore, Aglais urticae. Oikis 49: 39–45 [Google Scholar]
  • Ries L, Debinski DM (2001) Butterfly responses to habitat edges in the highly fragmented prairies of Central Iowa. J. Anim. Ecol. 70: 840–852 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Robinson RA, Sutherland WJ (2002) Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. J. Appl. Ecol. 39: 157–176 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schmitz G, Bartsch D, Pretscher P (2003) Selection of relevant non-target herbivores for monitoring the environmental effects of Bt maize pollen. Environ. Biosafety Res. 2: 117–132 [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schneider C, Dover J, Fry GLA (2003) Movement of two grassland butterflies in the same habitat network: the role of adult resources and size of the study area. Ecol Entomol. 28: 219–227 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sears MK, Hellmich RL, Stanley-Horn DE, Oberhauser KS, Pleasants JM, Mattila HR, Siegfried BD, Dively GP (2001) Impact of Bt corn pollen on monarch butterfly populations: a risk assessment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 98: 11937–11942 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shirai Y, Takahashi M (2005) Effects of transgenic Bt corn pollen on a non-target lycaenid butterfly Pseudozizeeria maha. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 40: 151–159 [Google Scholar]
  • Stanley-Horn DE, Dively GP, Hellmich RL, Mattila HR, Sears MK, Rose R, Jesse LCH, Losey JF, Obrycki JJ, Lewis L (2001) Assessing the impact of Cry1Ab-expressing corn pollen on monarch butterfly larvae in field studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 98: 11931–11936 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Warren MS (1997) Conserving Lepidoptera in a changing environment: a perspective from Western Europe. J. Insect Cons. 1: 1–4 [Google Scholar]
  • Wirooks L, Theissen B (1998) Neue Erkenntnisse zur Nahrungsökologie und Phänologie von Makrolepidopterenraupen – Eine Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse langjähriger Raupensuche unter besonderer Berücksichtigung ihrer Nahrungspflanzen und ihrer Phänologie. Melanargia 10: 69–109 [Google Scholar]
  • Wirooks L, Theissen B (1999) Neue Erkenntnisse zur Nahrungsökologie und Phänologie von Makrolepidopterenraupen – Eine Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse langjähriger Raupensuche unter besonderer Berücksichtigung ihrer Nahrungspflanzen und ihrer Phänologie. Melanargia 11: 1–79, 147–224, 241–279 [Google Scholar]
  • Woiwod IP (1997) Detecting the effects of climate change on Lepidoptera. J. Insect Cons. 1: 149–158 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wraight CL, Zangerl AR, Carroll MJ, Berenbaum MR (2000) Absence of toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis pollen to black swallowtails under field conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 98: 11908–11912 [Google Scholar]
  • Zabel J, Tscharntke T (1998) Does fragmentation of Urtica habitats affect phytophagous and predatory insects differentially? Oecologia 116: 419–425 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zangerl AR, McKenna D, Wraight CL, Carroll M, Ficarello P, Warner R, Berenbaum MR (2001) Effects of exposure to event 176 Bacillus thuringiensis corn pollen on monarch and black swallowtail caterpillars under field conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 98: 11908–11912 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]