Making the EU “Risk Window” transparent: The normative foundations of the environmental risk assessment of GMOs
Environ. Biosafety Res., 2 3 (2003) 161-171
Published online: 2003-11-15
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Engagement on risk assessment for gene drive mosquitoes by EFSA and Target Malaria
Sarah Hartley, Adam Kokotovich, Yann Devos and John MumfordEnvironmental Science & Policy 142 183 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.02.009
2631 1 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2990-1_1
Prescribing engagement in environmental risk assessment for gene drive technology
Sarah Hartley, Adam Kokotovich and Caroline McCalmanRegulation & Governance (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12452
Emerging Technologies for Invasive Insects: The Role of Engagement
Hannah Burrack, Johanna Elsensohn, Jason A Delborne, Adam E Kokotovich and Jeffrey MorisetteAnnals of the Entomological Society of America (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saz064
Genetic frontiers for conservation: an assessment of synthetic biology and biodiversity conservation: technical assessment
Kent H. Redford, Thomas M. Brooks, Nicholas B.W. Macfarlane and Jonathan S. AdamsGenetic frontiers for conservation: an assessment of synthetic biology and biodiversity conservation: technical assessment (2019)
https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2019.05.en
Inclusion and Implementation of Socio-Economic Considerations in GMO Regulations: Needs and Recommendations
Rosa Binimelis and Anne MyhrSustainability 8 (1) 62 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010062
Essential Features of Responsible Governance of Agricultural Biotechnology
Sarah Hartley, Frøydis Gillund, Lilian van Hove, Fern Wickson and Claire MarrisPLOS Biology 14 (5) e1002453 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002453
Towards a more open debate about values in decision-making on agricultural biotechnology
Yann Devos, Olivier Sanvido, Joyce Tait and Alan RaybouldTransgenic Research 23 (6) 933 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-013-9754-z
Regulating Biopharming: The Prism of Farmer Knowledge
Joanna Goven and Carolyn M. MorrisScience as Culture 21 (4) 497 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2012.685236
Risk assessment in the international food safety policy arena. Can the multilateral institutions encourage unbiased outcomes?
Lee Ann Jackson and Marion JansenFood Policy 35 (6) 538 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.07.004
The Challenge of Scientific Uncertainty and Disunity in Risk Assessment and Management of GM Crops
Anne Ingeborg MyhrEnvironmental Values 19 (1) 7 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.3197/096327110X485365
Farmer knowledge and a priori risk analysis: pre-release evaluation of genetically modified Roundup Ready wheat across the Canadian prairies
Ian J. Mauro, Stéphane M. McLachlan and Rene C. Van AckerEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research 16 (6) 689 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-009-0177-6
The once and future georgic: agricultural practice, environmental knowledge, and the place for an ethic of experience
Benjamin R. CohenAgriculture and Human Values 26 (3) 153 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-008-9172-7
Ethics in the Societal Debate on Genetically Modified Organisms: A (Re)Quest for Sense and Sensibility
Yann Devos, Pieter Maeseele, Dirk Reheul, Linda Van Speybroeck and Danny De WaeleJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (1) 29 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-007-9057-6
Agrobacterium: From Biology to Biotechnology
Kathrine H. Madsen and Peter SandøeAgrobacterium: From Biology to Biotechnology 677 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72290-0_19
The quality of food risk management in Europe: Perspectives and priorities
J.R. Houghton, G. Rowe, L.J. Frewer, et al.Food Policy 33 (1) 13 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.05.001
Assessing the assessments: Pharmaceuticals in the environment
O.V. Enick and M.M. MooreEnvironmental Impact Assessment Review 27 (8) 707 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.01.001
“The worth of a wildflower”: Precautionary perspectives on the environmental risk of GMOs
Iulie Aslaksen and Anne Ingeborg MyhrEcological Economics 60 (3) 489 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.021
The interplay between societal concerns and the regulatory frame on GM crops in the European Union
Yann Devos, Dirk Reheul, Danny De Waele and Linda Van SpeybroeckEnvironmental Biosafety Research 5 (3) 127 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2007002
“Conflict over Risks in Food Production: A Challenge for Democracy”
Karsten Klint JensenJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (3) 269 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-6167-x
Ethical reflections on herbicide‐resistant crops
Kathrine Hauge Madsen and Peter SandøePest Management Science 61 (3) 318 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.976