Free Access
| Issue |
Environ. Biosafety Res.
Volume 2, Number 3, July-September 2003
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 161 - 171 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2003011 | |
| Published online | 15 November 2003 | |
- Biotechnology and the European Public Concerted Action Group (BEPCAG) (1997) Europe ambivalent on biotechnology. Nature 387: 845-847 [Google Scholar]
- CEC (1990) Council Directive 90/220/EEC of 23 April 1990 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms [Google Scholar]
- CEC (1992) Opinions of Europeans on Biotechnology in 1991. Eurobarometer 35.1. Science Museum, London [Google Scholar]
- CEC (1993) Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering: What Europeans Think about it in 1993. Eurobarometer 39.1. CEC, Brussels [Google Scholar]
- CEC (1997) European Opinions on Modern Biotechnology. Eurobarometer 46.1. CEC, Brussels [Google Scholar]
- CEC (2000a) The Europeans and Biotechnology. Eurobarometer 52.1. CEC, Brussels [Google Scholar]
- CEC (2000b) Press Release of 13 July 2000. European Commission: press and information service IP/00/778 [Google Scholar]
- CEC (2000c) Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle. CEC, Brussels [Google Scholar]
- CEC (2001) Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC - Commission Declaration [Google Scholar]
- Danish Ministry of Trade and Industry, The (2000) The Danish Government Statement on Ethics and Genetic Engineering. Copenhagen [Google Scholar]
- EPA (1997) Notification C/DK/97/01. Summary of the evaluation carried out by the Danish competent authority [Google Scholar]
- FAO (1997) Risk management and food safety. Report of a joint FAO/WHO consultation Rome, Italy, 27 to 31 January 1997. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 65 [Google Scholar]
- Holtug N (2000) The harm principle and genetically modified food. J. Agr. Environ. Ethic 14: 169-178 [Google Scholar]
- Jasanoff S (1990) The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge [Google Scholar]
- Jensen KK (2002) The Moral Foundation of the Precautionary Principle. J. Agr. Environ. Ethic 15: 39-55 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Levidow L and Carr S (eds.) (2000) Precautionary Regulation: GM Crops in the European Union, J. Risk Res., Special Issue 3 (3) [Google Scholar]
- Mill JS (1859) On Liberty. In Mill JS, ed, Utilitarianism, On Liberty, Considerations on Representative Government London Dent, 1993, pp 69-185 [Google Scholar]
- NFNA (1997) Vedr. anmeldelse af foderroe (Beta vulgaris L. ssp. vulgaris) til markedsføring, i henhold til del C, artikel 12(3) i Direktiv 90/220/EØF. Skov- og Naturstyrelsen. [Google Scholar]
- NRC (1996) Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Academy Press, Washington D.C. [Google Scholar]
- OECD (1993) Safety Considerations for Biotechnology: Scale-Up of Crop Plants. Publications Service, OECD, Paris [Google Scholar]
- PD (1997) Vedr.: Vurdering af anmeldelse om markedsføring af en genetisk modificeret foderroe (C/DK/97/01). Plantedirektoratet. [Google Scholar]
- Rawls J (1993) Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press, New York [Google Scholar]
- Shrader-Frechette KS (1985) Risk Analysis and Scientific Method, Reidel, Dordrecht [Google Scholar]
- Tømmerås BÅ, Johnsen Ø, Skrøppa T, Hindar K, Holten J, Tufto J (1996) Long-term environmental impacts of release of transgenic Norway spruce (Picea abies). Trondheim: NINA/NIKU, Foundation for Nature Research and Cultural Heritage Research [Google Scholar]
- VFA (1997) Vedr. vurdering fra Instituttet for Toksikologi af ansøgning C/DK/97/01 om markedsføring af gensplejset foderroe A5/15. Veterinær- og Fødevaredirektoratet [Google Scholar]
- WHO (1995) Application of Risk Analysis to Food Standards Issues, Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation, 13-17 March 1995, Geneva, Switzerland [Google Scholar]
- Wynne B (1996) May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View on the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide. In Lash S, Szerszynski B and Wynne B, eds, Risk, Environment and Modernity. Towards a new Modernity. Sage, London, pp 44-83 [Google Scholar]