Conceptualizing risk assessment methodology for genetically modified organisms
Environ. Biosafety Res., 4 2 (2005) 67-70
Published online: 2005-11-15
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Removal of toxic heavy metals using genetically engineered microbes: Molecular tools, risk assessment and management strategies
A. Saravanan, P. Senthil Kumar, B. Ramesh and S. SrinivasanChemosphere 298 134341 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134341
Sublethal Endpoints in Non-target Organism Testing for Insect-Active GE Crops
Andrew Roberts, Chad J. Boeckman, Marina Mühl, et al.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 8 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00556
Past, Present and Future Perspectives on Groundnut Breeding in Burkina Faso
Moumouni Konate, Jacob Sanou, Amos Miningou, David Kalule Okello, Haile Desmae, Paspuleti Janila and Rita H. MummAgronomy 10 (5) 704 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10050704
19 343 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53183-6_15
67 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101892-7.00006-7
Development of community of practice to support quantitative risk assessment for synthetic biology products: contaminant bioremediation and invasive carp control as cases
Benjamin D. Trump, Christy Foran, Taylor Rycroft, et al.Environment Systems and Decisions 38 (4) 517 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-018-9710-9
Modern Age Environmental Problems and their Remediation
Meenakshi Raina, Pankaj Pandotra, R. K. Salgotra, et al.Modern Age Environmental Problems and their Remediation 69 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64501-8_4
Using Risk Analysis for Flood Protection Assessment
Martina Zeleňáková and Lenka ZvijákováUsing Risk Analysis for Flood Protection Assessment 1 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52150-3_1
Likelihood assessment for gene flow of transgenes from imported genetically modified soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) to wild soybean (Glycine soja Seib. et Zucc.) in Japan as a component of environmental risk assessment
Hidetoshi Goto, Marc A. McPherson, Bradley A. Comstock, Duška Stojšin and Ryo OhsawaBreeding Science 67 (4) 348 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.16134
Introduction and use of non‐native species for aquaculture in China: status, risks and management solutions
Yaping Lin, Zexia Gao and Aibin ZhanReviews in Aquaculture 7 (1) 28 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12052
Proposed criteria for identifying GE crop plants that pose a low or negligible risk to the environment under conditions of low-level presence in seed
Andrew Roberts, Flavio Finardi-Filho, Subray Hegde, et al.Transgenic Research 24 (5) 783 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-015-9899-z
Selection of bee species for environmental risk assessment of GM cotton in the Brazilian Cerrado
Carmen Sílvia Soares Pires, Fernando Amaral Silveira, Carolina Ferreira Cardoso, et al.Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 49 (8) 573 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2014000800001
Environmental risk assessment of GE plants under low-exposure conditions
Andrew Roberts, Yann Devos, Alan Raybould, Patrick Bigelow and Alan GrayTransgenic Research 23 (6) 971 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-013-9762-z
Methodologies and special considerations for environmental risk analysis of genetically modified aquatic biocontrol organisms
Genya V. Dana, Anne M. Cooper, Kelly M. Pennington and Leah S. SharpeBiological Invasions 16 (6) 1257 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0391-x
1666 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5797-8_167
Introgression of Crop Alleles into Wild or Weedy Populations
Norman C. Ellstrand, Patrick Meirmans, Jun Rong, Detlef Bartsch, Atiyo Ghosh, Tom J. de Jong, Patsy Haccou, Bao-Rong Lu, Allison A. Snow, C. Neal Stewart, Jared L. Strasburg, Peter H. van Tienderen, Klaas Vrieling and Danny HooftmanAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 44 (1) 325 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135840
Genetically engineered trees for plantation forests: key considerations for environmental risk assessment
Hely Häggman, Alan Raybould, Aluizio Borem, Thomas Fox, Levis Handley, Magnus Hertzberg, Meng‐Zu Lu, Philip Macdonald, Taichi Oguchi, Giancarlo Pasquali, Les Pearson, Gary Peter, Hector Quemada, Armand Séguin, Kylie Tattersall, Eugênio Ulian, Christian Walter and Morven McLeanPlant Biotechnology Journal 11 (7) 785 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12100
The structuring of GMO release and evaluation in EU law
Caroline von Kries and Gerd WinterBiotechnology Journal 7 (4) 569 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201100321
GeneRisk
Hartmut MeyerGeneRisk 269 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23433-0_17
10765 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3_167
Systemic risks of genetically modified crops: the need for new approaches to risk assessment
Hartmut MeyerEnvironmental Sciences Europe 23 (1) (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715-23-7
Risks and Precautions of Genetically Modified Organisms
Dhan Prakash, Sonika Verma, Ranjana Bhatia and B. N. TiwaryISRN Ecology 2011 1 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/369573
Introgression potential between safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) and wild relatives of the genus Carthamus
Marion Mayerhofer, Reinhold Mayerhofer, Deborah Topinka, Jed Christianson and Allen G GoodBMC Plant Biology 11 (1) (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-11-47
Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants
Jeffrey D. Wolt, Paul Keese, Alan Raybould, et al.Transgenic Research 19 (3) 425 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-009-9321-9
Scientific Opinion on the assessment of potential impacts of genetically modified plants on non-target organisms
EFSA Journal 8 (11) 1877 (2010)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1877
64 553 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02391-0_26
The Challenge of Scientific Uncertainty and Disunity in Risk Assessment and Management of GM Crops
Anne Ingeborg MyhrEnvironmental Values 19 (1) 7 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.3197/096327110X485365
Problem Formulation and Option Assessment (PFOA) Linking Governance and Environmental Risk Assessment for Technologies: A Methodology for Problem Analysis of Nanotechnologies and Genetically Engineered Organisms
Kristen C. Nelson, David A. Andow and Michael J. BankerJournal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37 (4) 732 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00444.x
A Primer for Using Transgenic Insecticidal Cotton in Developing Countries
Ann M. Showalter, Shannon Heuberger, Bruce E. Tabashnik and Yves CarrièreJournal of Insect Science 9 (22) 1 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1673/031.009.2201
Consultations of stakeholders on the roles of research in relation to genetically modified plants in France
Agnès Ricroch and Franck JésusPublic Understanding of Science 18 (1) 91 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507078015
Ecological risk assessment of genetically modified crops based on cellular automata modeling
Jun Yang, Zhi-Rui Wang, De-Li Yang, et al.Biotechnology Advances 27 (6) 1132 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.05.024
Risks from GMOs due to Horizontal Gene Transfer
Paul KeeseEnvironmental Biosafety Research 7 (3) 123 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2008014
Journal of Plant Biotechnology will be revolved toward the most rapid publication in the world plant science community in 2008: from submission to publication within two weeks
Journal of Plant Biotechnology 35 (1) 1 (2008)https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2008.35.1.001
Risk assessment and variety registration of transgenic crops
Journal of Plant Biotechnology 35 (1) 13 (2008)https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2008.35.1.013
23 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405181099.k0302
GMO risk assessment around the world: Some examples
Claudia Paoletti, Eric Flamm, William Yan, et al.Trends in Food Science & Technology 19 S70 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2008.07.007
Genetic containment of forest plantations
Amy M. Brunner, Jingyi Li, Stephen P. DiFazio, et al.Tree Genetics & Genomes 3 (2) 75 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-006-0067-8
Genetic use restriction technologies (GURTs): strategies to impede transgene movement
Melissa J. Hills, Linda Hall, Paul G. Arnison and Allen G. GoodTrends in Plant Science 12 (4) 177 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2007.02.002
Varietal effects of eight paired lines of transgenic Bt maize and near‐isogenic non‐Bt maize on soil microbial and nematode community structure
Bryan S. Griffiths, Lars‐Henrik Heckmann, Sandra Caul, Jacqueline Thompson, Charlie Scrimgeour and Paul Henning KroghPlant Biotechnology Journal 5 (1) 60 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2006.00215.x
The interplay between societal concerns and the regulatory frame on GM crops in the European Union
Yann Devos, Dirk Reheul, Danny De Waele and Linda Van SpeybroeckEnvironmental Biosafety Research 5 (3) 127 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2007002