The bucket and the searchlight: formulating and testing risk hypotheses about the weediness and invasiveness potential of transgenic crops
Environ. Biosafety Res., 9 3 (2010) 123-133
Published online: 2011-04-05
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Problem formulation for a small-scale field study of non-gene drive, genetically modified, male bias mosquitoes in Burkina Faso
Keith R. Hayes and Geoffrey R. HosackHuman and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 31 (5-6) 833 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2025.2484229
Opinion: Advancing science in support of sustainable bio-innovation: 16th ISBR Symposium – in memory of Professor Alan Raybould
Alan Gray, Monica Garcia-Alonso, Karen Hokanson, Andrew Roberts, Jörg Romeis and Joe SmithFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 13 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1593891
951 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824315-2.00012-9
425 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4363-6_16
Evaluating the risk of living modified organisms on the natural ecosystem by analyzing the overwintering potential of four major species imported into Korea
Kyong-Hee Nam, Sung Min Han, Seong-Jun Chun, Jun-Woo Lee and Jihoon KimJournal of Ecology and Environment 48 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.5141/jee.24.070
Agronomic and phenotypic plant traits as indicators for environmental risks of genetically modified plants
Dolezel Marion, Miklau Marianne, Heissenberger Andreas and Otto MathiasEnvironmental Sciences Europe 36 (1) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-023-00828-y
Conceptual risk assessment of mosquito population modification gene-drive systems to control malaria transmission: preliminary hazards list workshops
Ana Kormos, George Dimopoulos, Ethan Bier, Gregory C. Lanzaro, John M. Marshall and Anthony A. JamesFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 11 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1261123
Efficiency verification of CRISPR–Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of target gene sgRNA using soybean protoplasts
Min-A. Seol, Sunghee Cho and Young Jun JungPlant Biotechnology Reports 16 (5) 599 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-022-00790-w
Assessing the potential invasiveness of transgenic plants in South Korea: a three-year case study on sunflowers
Sung Min Han and Kyong-Hee NamJournal of Ecology and Environment 46 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.5141/jee.22.039
41 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2001-1_4
Waste To Energy Feedstock Sources for the Production of Biodiesel as Fuel Energy in Diesel Engine – A Review
Maroa Semakula and Freddie InambaoAdvances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal 6 (1) 409 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.25046/aj060147
19 305 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53183-6_14
Adequacy and sufficiency evaluation of existing EFSA guidelines for the molecular characterisation, environmental risk assessment and post‐market environmental monitoring of genetically modified insects containing engineered gene drives
Hanspeter Naegeli, Jean‐Louis Bresson, Tamas Dalmay, Ian C Dewhurst, Michelle M Epstein, Philippe Guerche, Jan Hejatko, Francisco J Moreno, Ewen Mullins, Fabien Nogué, Nils Rostoks, Jose J Sánchez Serrano, Giovanni Savoini, Eve Veromann, Fabio Veronesi, Michael B Bonsall, John Mumford, Ernst A Wimmer, Yann Devos, Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos and Leslie G FirbankEFSA Journal 18 (11) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6297
Biofuels Production – Sustainability and Advances in Microbial Bioresources
Manoj Kumar Mahapatra and Arvind KumarBiofuel and Biorefinery Technologies, Biofuels Production – Sustainability and Advances in Microbial Bioresources 11 337 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53933-7_16
Seed Germination of Sunflower as a Case Study for the Risk Assessment and Management of Transgenic Plants Used for Environmental Remediation in South Korea
Kyong-Hee Nam and Sung Min HanSustainability 12 (23) 10110 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310110
Fourth generation biofuel: A review on risks and mitigation strategies
Bawadi Abdullah, Syed Anuar Faua’ad Syed Muhammad, Zahra Shokravi, et al.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 107 37 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.018
Using problem formulation to clarify the meaning of weight of evidence and biological relevance in environmental risk assessments for genetically modified crops
Alan Raybould, Karen Holt and Ian KimberGM Crops & Food 10 (2) 63 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2019.1621615
Conducting fit‐for‐purpose food safety risk assessments
Yann Devos, Kevin C Elliott, Philip Macdonald, et al.EFSA Journal 17 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170707
Using problem formulation for fit‐for‐purpose pre‐market environmental risk assessments of regulated stressors
Yann Devos, Wendy Craig, Robert H Devlin, et al.EFSA Journal 17 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170708
Teosinte and maize × teosinte hybrid plants in Europe−Environmental risk assessment and management implications for genetically modified maize
Yann Devos, Sol Ortiz-García, Karen E. Hokanson and Alan RaybouldAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 259 19 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.02.032
Genetically Engineered Foods
Wilna J. van Rijssen and E. Jane MorrisGenetically Engineered Foods 335 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811519-0.00013-3
Policy-Led Comparative Environmental Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Crops: Testing for Increased Risk Rather Than Profiling Phenotypes Leads to Predictable and Transparent Decision-Making
Alan Raybould and Phil MacdonaldFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 6 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00043
Trends in Insect Molecular Biology and Biotechnology
Leela Alamalakala, Srinivas Parimi, Navid Patel and Bharat CharTrends in Insect Molecular Biology and Biotechnology 193 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61343-7_10
Human Health and Environmental Risks Posed by Synthetic Biology R&D for Energy Applications
Joel P. Hewett, Amy K. Wolfe, Rachael A. Bergmann, Savannah C. Stelling and Kimberly L. DavisApplied Biosafety 21 (4) 177 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1177/1535676016672377
Coverage of endangered species in environmental risk assessments at EFSA
EFSA Journal 14 (2) 4312 (2016)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4312
Spread of volunteer and feral maize plants in Central Europe: recent data from Austria
Kathrin PascherEnvironmental Sciences Europe 28 (1) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-016-0098-1
Recovery in environmental risk assessments at EFSA
EFSA Journal 14 (2) 4313 (2016)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4313
Guidance to develop specific protection goals options for environmental risk assessment at EFSA, in relation to biodiversity and ecosystem services
EFSA Journal 14 (6) e04499 (2016)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4499
Assessment of unanticipated unintended effects of genetically modified plants on non‐target organisms: a controversy worthy of pursuit?
Y. Devos, F. Álvarez‐Alfageme, A. Gennaro and S. MestdaghJournal of Applied Entomology 140 (1-2) 1 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12248
Governmental regulation of genetically modified agricultural products: Analysis of different approaches in the world
I. V. Yakovleva, S. V. Vinogradova and A. M. KamionskayaRussian Journal of Genetics: Applied Research 6 (6) 646 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079059716060095
State regulation of the biotechnology (GM) agricultural products: analysis of different approaches in the world
Irina Vladimirovna Yakovleva, Svetlana Vladimirovna Vinogradova and Anastasiya Mikhaylovna KamionskayaEcological genetics 13 (2) 21 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.17816/ecogen13221-35
Transportability of confined field trial data from cultivation to import countries for environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops
Shuichi Nakai, Kana Hoshikawa, Ayako Shimono and Ryo OhsawaTransgenic Research 24 (6) 929 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-015-9892-6
Genetic basis and detection of unintended effects in genetically modified crop plants
Gregory S. Ladics, Andrew Bartholomaeus, Phil Bregitzer, et al.Transgenic Research 24 (4) 587 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-015-9867-7
Towards a more open debate about values in decision-making on agricultural biotechnology
Yann Devos, Olivier Sanvido, Joyce Tait and Alan RaybouldTransgenic Research 23 (6) 933 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-013-9754-z
Deriving criteria to select arthropod species for laboratory tests to assess the ecological risks from cultivating arthropod-resistant genetically engineered crops
Jörg Romeis, Alan Raybould, Franz Bigler, et al.Chemosphere 90 (3) 901 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.035
Food Safety: Importance of Composition for Assessing Genetically Modified Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)
Fredrika W. Jansen van Rijssen, E. Jane Morris and Jacobus N. EloffJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 61 (35) 8333 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf401153x
Putting problem formulation at the forefront of GMO risk analysis
Mark Tepfer, Monica Racovita and Wendy CraigGM Crops & Food 4 (1) 10 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.4161/gmcr.22906
317 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2156-2_15
Commercializing genetically modified crops under EU regulations
Alan Raybould and Guy M. PoppyGM Crops & Food 3 (1) 9 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.4161/gmcr.18961
Assessing the ecological risks from the persistence and spread of feral populations of insect-resistant transgenic maize
Alan Raybould, Laura S. Higgins, Michael J. Horak, et al.Transgenic Research 21 (3) 655 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-011-9560-4
The Current State of the Environmental Impact Assessment of Abiotic Stress-Tolerant Genetically Modified Plants in the U.S., Canada, Australia, EU and Japan
Yasuyuki Yoshimura and Kazuhito MatsuoJapanese Journal of Crop Science 81 (2) 137 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.81.137
Evaluating environmental risks of genetically modified crops: ecological harm criteria for regulatory decision-making
Olivier Sanvido, Jörg Romeis, Achim Gathmann, et al.Environmental Science & Policy 15 (1) 82 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.006