EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 8 / No 4 (October-December 2009) Environ. Biosafety Res., 8 4 (2009) 219-225 References
Open Access
Issue
Environ. Biosafety Res.
Volume 8, Number 4, October-December 2009
Page(s) 219 - 225
Section Commentary
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr/2009018
Published online 26 January 2010
  • ACRE (2004) Guidance on best practice in the design of post-market monitoring plans in submission to the advisory committee on releases to the environment, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs – Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment, London, p 21 [Google Scholar]
  • Álvarez-Alfageme F, Ferry N, Castañera P, Ortego F, Gatehouse AMR (2008) Prey mediated effects of Bt maize on fitness and digestive physiology of the red spider mite predator Stethorus punctillum Weise (Coleoptera: Coccinelidae). Transg. Res. 17: 943–954 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Andreadis SS,Álvarez-Alfageme F,Sánchez-Ramos I,Stodola TJ,Andow DA,Milonas PG,Savopoulou-Soultani M,Castañera P (2007) Frequency of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ab in Greek and Spanish population of Sesamia nonagrioides (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 100: 195–201 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Aviron S,Sanvido O,Romeis J,Herzog F,Bigler F (2009) Case-specific monitoring of butterflies to determine potential effects of transgenic Bt-maize in Switzerland. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 131: 137–144 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bartsch D, Gathmann A, Koziolek C, Vaasen A, Buhk HJ (2009) Implication of the Environmental Liability Directive for General Surveillance – What to Protect? Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety 3, Supplement 2: 8–11 [Google Scholar]
  • BMBF – Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (2009) Integration landwirtschaftlicher, ökologischer und biometrischer Aspekte zu einer praktikablen methodik der Flächenauswahl und datenerhebung für das Anbaubegleitende Monitoring. Funding Code: 0313286 [Google Scholar]
  • Bühler C (2006) Biodiversity monitoring in Switzerland: What can we learn for general surveillance of GM crops? Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety 1, Supplement 1: 37–41 [Google Scholar]
  • De la Poza M, Pons X, Farinós GP, López C, Ortego F, Eizaguirre M, Castañera P, Albajes R (2005) Impact of farm-scale Bt maize on abundance of predatory arthropods in Spain. Crop Prot. 24: 677–684 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • DEFRA (2008) Consultation on the draft regulations and guidance implementing Directive 2004/35 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage. http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/env-liability-regs/ [Google Scholar]
  • Delos M, Hervieu F, Folcher L, Micoud A, Eychenne N (2006) Biological surveillance programme for the monitoring of crop pests and indicators in France. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety 1, Supplement 1: 30–36 [Google Scholar]
  • EFSA (2006) Opinion of the scientific panel on genetically modified organisms on the post-market environmental monitoring (PMEM) of genetically modified plants. The EFSA Journal 319: 1–27 [Google Scholar]
  • EFSA (2009) Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms Applications (EFSA-GMO-RX-MON810) for renewal of authorisation for the continued marketing of (1) existing food and food ingredients produced from genetically modified insect resistant maize MON810; (2) feed consisting of and/or containing maize MON810, including the use of seed for cultivation; and of (3) food and feed additives, and feed materials produced from maize MON810, all under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto. The EFSA Journal 1149: 1–84 [Google Scholar]
  • Farinós GP, De la Poza M, Hernández-Crespo P, Ortego F, Castañera P (2004) Resistance monitoring of field populations of the corn borers Sesamia nonagrioides and Ostrinia nubilalis after five years of Bt maize cultivation in Spain. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 110: 23–30 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Farinós GP, De la Poza M, Hernández-Crespo P, Ortego F, Castañera P (2008) Diversity and seasonal phenology of the aboveground arthropods in conventional and transgenic maize crops in Central Spain. Biol. Control 44: 362–371 [Google Scholar]
  • Fried G,Petit S,Dessaint F,Reboud X (2009) Arable weed decline in Northern France: Crop edges as refugia for weed conservation? Biol. Conserv. 142: 238–243 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • González-Núñez M,Ortego F,Castañera P (2000) Susceptibility of Spanish populations of the corn borers Sesamia nonagrioides (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) to a Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin. J. Econ. Entomol. 93: 459–463 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Graef F, Züghart W, Benzler A, Berhorn F, Sukopp U (2007) Monitoring genetically modified plants (GMP): Data harmonisation and coordination on multiple levels to ensure data quality and comparability. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety 2, Supplement 2: 72–75 [Google Scholar]
  • Hill RA,Sendashonga C (2003) General principles for risk assessment of living modified organisms: Lessons from chemical risk assessment. Environ. Biosafety Res. 2: 81–88 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • James C (2007) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2007, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, Ithaca NY, p 125 [Google Scholar]
  • Levidow L (2003) Precautionary risk assessment of Bt maize: what uncertainties? J. Invertebr. Pathol. 83: 113–117 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nguyen HT, Jehle JA (2009) Stability of Cry1Ab protein during long-term storage for standardization of insect bioassays. Environ. Biosafety Res. 8: 113–119 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sanvido O,Widmer F,Winzeler M,Bigler F (2005) A conceptual framework for the design of environmental post-market monitoring of genetically modified plants. Environ. Biosafety Res. 4: 13–27 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sanvido O, Romeis J, Bigler F (2008) Monitoring or Surveillance? Balancing between theoretical frameworks and practical experiences. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety 3, Supplement 2: 4–7 [Google Scholar]
  • Schmidt K,Wilhelm R,Schmidtke J,Beißner L,Mönkemeyer W,Böttinger P,Sweet J,Schiemann J (2008) Farm questionnaires for monitoring genetically modified crops: a case study using GM maize. Environ. Biosafety Res. 7: 163–179 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sweet JB (2009) General Surveillance of Multiple Transgenic Events. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety 3, Supplement 2: 12 [Google Scholar]
  • The European Council (2002) Council decision of 3 October 2002 establishing guidance notes supplementing Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC, The Council of the European Union, Luxemburg. Official Journal of the European Communities L 280: 27–36 [Google Scholar]
  • The European Parliament and the Council (2001) Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC, European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, Brussels. Official Journal of the European Communities L 106: 1–38 [Google Scholar]
  • The European Parliament and the Council (2004) Directive 2004/35/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage. Official Journal of the European Communities L 143: 56–75 [Google Scholar]
  • Tinland B, Delzenne P, Pleysier A (2007) Implementation of a post-market monitoring for insect-protected maize MON 810 in the EU. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety 2, Supplement 2: 7–10 [Google Scholar]
  • Von Kröcher C, Röhrig M (2007) Monitoring of plant pests and diseases as a base of the German-wide online decision support system ISIP. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety 2, Supplement 2: 50–51 [Google Scholar]
  • Wilhelm R, Schiemann J (2006) Does the baseline concept provide appropriate tools for decision making? Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, 1, Supplement 1: 75–77 [Google Scholar]
  • Wilhelm R,Beissner L,Schiemann J (2003) Konzept zur Umsetzung eines GVO-Monitoring in Deutschland. Nachrichtenblatt des Deutschen Pflanzenschutzbundes 55: 258–272 [Google Scholar]
  • Windels P, Alcalde E, Lecoq E, Legris G, Pleysier A, Tinland B, Wandelt C (2008) General Surveillance for Import and Processing: the EuropaBio approach. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety 3, Supplement 2: 14–16 [Google Scholar]