Free Access
Issue
Environ. Biosafety Res.
Volume 7, Number 1, January-March 2008
Page(s) 35 - 56
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2008003
Published online 03 April 2008
  • Andow DA, Hilbeck A (2004) Science-based risk assessment for nontarget effects of transgenic crops. Bioscience 54: 637–649 [CrossRef]
  • Andow DA, Zwahlen C (2006) Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants. Ecol. Lett. 9: 196–214 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Andow DA, Birch ANE, Dusi AN, Fontes EMG, Hilbeck A, Lang A, Lövei GL, Pires CSS, Sujii ER, Underwood E, Wheatley RE (2006) Non-target and biodiversity risk assessment for genetically modified (GM) crops. 9th Int. Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms, Korea
  • Anon (1996) Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996. New Zealand Government, Wellington
  • Anon (2003) GMO ERA project: Impacts on non-target species and biodiversity. http://www.gmo-guidelines.info/public/science/nontarget.html
  • Candolfi MP, Brown K, Grimm C, Reber B, Schmidli H (2004) A faunistic approach to assess potential side-effects of genetically modified Bt-corn on non-target arthropods under field conditions. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 14: 129–170
  • CBD (2003) Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (Montreal, 29 January 2000): Status of ratification and entry into force. http://www.cbd.int/biosafety/signinglist.shtml
  • CFIA (2004) Directive 94-08: Assessment criteria for determining environmental safety of plants with novel traits. Canadian Food Inspection Agency. http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/plaveg/bio/dir/dir9408e.pdf
  • CFIA (undated) Biology documents: Companion documents for Directive 94-08, assessment criteria for determining environmental safety of plants with novel traits. Canadian Food Inspection Agency. http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/plaveg/bio/dir/biodoce.shtml
  • Chapman S (1999) Field guide to common pests, diseases and other disorders of radiata pine in New Zealand. Forest Research Bulletin. 207: 57
  • Clare GK, Ochieng'-Odero JPR, Dalzell SJ, Singh P (1987) A practical rearing method for leafrollers (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). N. Z. J. Zool. 14: 597–601
  • Collier KJ, Smith BJ, Baillie BR (1997) Summer light-trap catches of adult Trichoptera in hill-country catchments of contrasting land use, Waikato, New Zealand. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 31: 623–634 [CrossRef]
  • Cowgill SE, Atkinson HJ (2003) A sequential approach to risk assessment of transgenic plants expressing protease inhibitors: effects on nontarget herbivorous insects. Transgen. Res. 12: 439–449 [CrossRef]
  • Crowe A (2002) Which New Zealand Insect? Penguin Books (NZ) Ltd, Auckland
  • DBT (1998) Revised guidelines for research in transgenic plants: Guidelines for toxicity and allergenicity evaluation of transgenic seeds, plants and plant parts. Department of Biotechnology, Government of India. http://dbtindia.nic.in/thanks/biosafetymain.html
  • DEFRA (2002) Draft: Deliberate release of genetically modified organisms: a guide. Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/gm/regulation/pdf/gm-guide_draft.pdf
  • DGR (undated) Guidance document for use by applicant to complete the application forms for activities with genetically (living) modified organisms in South Africa. Directorate of Genetic Resources, Republic of South Africa. http://www.nda.agric.za/docs/geneticresources/guidance_document.pdf
  • Duan JJ, Head G, Jensen A, Reed G (2004) Effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis potato and conventional insecticides for Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) management on the abundance of ground-dwelling arthropods in Oregon potato ecosystems. Environ. Entomol. 33: 275–281 [CrossRef]
  • Dutton A, Romeis J, Bigler F (2002) Test procedure to evaluate the risk that insect-resistant transgenic plants pose to entomophagous arthropods. Proc. 1st Int. Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods, Hawaii
  • Dutton A, Romeis J, Bigler F (2003) Assessing the risks of insect resistant transgenic plants on entomophagous arthropods: Bt-maize expressing Cry1Ab as a case study. BioControl 48: 611–636 [CrossRef]
  • EFSA (2005) Guidance document of the scientific panel on genetically modified organisms for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed. European Food Safety Authority. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/etc/medialib/efsa/science/gmo/gmo_guidance/660.Par.0004.File.dat/guidance_docfinal1.pdf
  • ERMA (undated-a) Form NOCR. Application for approval to import for release or release from containment with controls any new organisms under section 38A of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996. Environmental Risk Management Authority New Zealand. http://www.ermanz.govt.nz/resources/publications/pdfs/ER-AF-NOCR-1.pdf
  • ERMA (undated-b) ERMA New Zealand user guide to making an application to import for release or release from containment with controls any new organisms under section 38A of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996. Environmental Risk Management Authority New Zealand. http://www.ermanz.govt.nz/resources/publications/pdfs/ER-UG-NOCR-1.pdf.
  • EU (2001) Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. European Union. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/biotechnology/pdf/dir2001_18.pdf
  • Fan M, Thongsri T, Axe L, Tyson TA (2005) Using a probabilistic approach in an ecological risk assessment simulation tool: test case for depleted uranium (DU). Chemosphere 60: 111–125 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Garcia-Alonso M, Jacobs E, Raybould A, Nickson TE, Sowig P, Willekens H, Van der Kouwe P, Layton R, Amijee F, Fuentes AM, Tencalla F (2006) A tiered system for assessing the risk of genetically modified plants to non-target organisms. Environ. Biosafety Res. 5: 57–65 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed]
  • Glare TR, O'Callaghan M (2000) Bacillus thuringiensis: Biology, Ecology and Safety, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Chichester.
  • Grace LJ, Charity JA, Gresham B, Kay N, Walter C (2005) Insect-resistant transgenic Pinus radiata. Plant Cell Rep. 24: 103–111
  • Gunderson LH (2000) Ecological resilience – in theory and application. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 425–439 [CrossRef]
  • Hansen BG, van Haelst AG, van Leeuwen K, van der Zandt P (1999) Priority setting for existing chemicals: European Union risk ranking method. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 18: 772–779 [CrossRef]
  • Heidorn CJA, Rasmussen K, Hansen BG, Nørager O, Allanou R, Seynaeve R, Scheer S, Kappes D, Bernasconi R (2003) IUCLID: An information management tool for existing chemicals and biocides. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43: 779–786 [PubMed]
  • Henderson AR, Walter C (2006) Genetic engineering in conifer plantation forestry. Silvae Genet. 55: 253–262
  • Hilbeck A, Andow DA (2004) Environmental Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Organisms, Volume 1: A Case Study of Bt Maize in Kenya. CABI Publishing, Wallingford
  • Hilbeck A, Andow DA, Fontes EMG (2006) Environmental Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Organisms, Volume 2: Methodologies for Assessing Bt Cotton in Brazil. CABI Publishing, Wallingford
  • Hódar JA (1996) The use of regression equations for estimation of arthropod biomass in ecological studies. Acta Oecol. Int. J. Ecol. 17: 421–433
  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4: 1–23 [CrossRef]
  • Hope BK (1995) A review of models for estimating terrestrial ecological receptor exposure to chemical contaminants. Chemosphere 30: 2267–2287
  • Jepson PC, Croft BA, Pratt GE (1994) Test systems to determine the ecological risks posed by toxin release from Bacillus thuringiensis genes in crop plants. Mol. Ecol. 3: 81–89 [CrossRef]
  • Kim YS, Uefuji H, Ogita S, Sano H (2006) Transgenic tobacco plants producing caffeine: a potential new strategy for insect pest control. Transgen. Res. 15: 667–672 [CrossRef]
  • Kough J, Vaituzis Z (1999) SAP Report No. 99-06. FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Meeting, Arlington. http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/meetings/1999/december/report.pdf
  • Lewis PI (2002) SAP meeting minutes No. 2002-05. FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Meeting, Arlington. http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/meetings/2002/august/august2002final.pdf
  • Lewis PI, Portier C (2000) SAP report No. 99-06A. FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Meeting, Arlington. http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/meetings/1999/december/report.pdf
  • Lockwood JA (1999) Agriculture and biodiversity: finding our place in this world. Agric. Human Values 16: 365–379 [CrossRef]
  • Lövei GL, Arpaia S (2005) The impact of transgenic plants on natural enemies: a critical review of laboratory studies. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 114: 1–14
  • Lu H, Axe L, Tyson TA (2003) Development and application of computer simulation tools for ecological risk assessment. Environ. Model. Assess. 8: 311–322
  • Macintosh DL, Suter GW, Hoffman FO (1994) Uses of probabilistic exposure models in ecological risk assessments of contaminated sites. Risk Anal. 14: 405–419 [CrossRef]
  • Marvier M (2002) Improving risk assessment for nontarget safety of transgenic crops. Ecol. Appl. 12: 1119–1124
  • Meyer E (1989) The relationship between body length parameters and dry mass in running water invertebrates. Arch. Hydrobiol. 117: 191–203
  • Miller D (1971) Common insects in New Zealand. A.H. & A.W. Reed Ltd, Wellington
  • Nute D, Potter WD, Maier F, Wang J, Twery M, Rauscher HM, Knopp P, Thomasma S, Dass M, Uchiyama H, Glende A (2004) NED-2: an agent-based decision support system for forest ecosystem management. Environ. Modell. Software 19: 831–843 [CrossRef]
  • Padovani L, Trevisan M, Capri E (2004) A calculation procedure to assess potential environmental risk of pesticides at the farm level. Ecol. Indic. 4: 111–123 [CrossRef]
  • Pastorok RA, Akçakaya HR, Regan H, Ferson S, Bartell SM (2003) Role of ecological modeling in risk assessment. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 9: 939–972 [CrossRef]
  • Pendergrast JG, Cowley DR (1969) An Introduction to New Zealand Freshwater Insects. Collins, Auckland
  • Pilcher CD, Rice ME, Obrycki JJ (2005) Impact of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis corn and crop phenology on five nontarget arthropods. Environ. Entomol. 34: 1302–1316 [CrossRef]
  • Raybould A (2007) Ecological versus ecotoxicological methods for assessing the environmental risks of transgenic crops. Plant Sci. 173: 589–602 [CrossRef]
  • Rogers LE, Hinds WT, Buschbom RL (1976) A general weight vs. length relationship for insects. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 69: 387–389
  • Rogers LE, Buschbom RL, Watson CR (1977) Length-weight relationships of shrub-steppe invertebrates. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 70: 51–53
  • Romeis J (2006) Non-target risk assessment of GM crops and regulation. GMOs in Integrated Plant Production IOBC wprs Bulletin 29: 197–200
  • Romeis J, Bartsch D, Bigler F, Candolfi M, Gielkens MMC, Hartley SE, Hellmich RL, Huesing JE, Jepson PC, Layton R, Quemada H, Raybould A, Rose RI, Schiemann J, Sears MK, Shelton AM, Sweet J, Vaituzis Z, Wolt JD (2006) Moving through the tiered and methodological framework for non-target arthropod risk assessment of transgenic insecticidal crops. 9th Int. Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms, Korea
  • Rose RI (2006) Tier-based testing for effects of proteinaceous insecticidal plant-incorporated protectants on non-target arthropods in the context of regulatory risk assessments. GMOs in Integrated Plant Production IOBC wprs Bulletin 29: 143–150
  • Russom CL, Breton RL, Walker JD, Bradbury SP (2003) An overview of the use of quantitative structure-activity relationships for ranking and prioritising large chemical inventories for environmental risk assessments. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 22: 1810–1821 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • SAGPYA (undated) Marco regulatorio de la biotecnología agropecuaria en la República Argentina. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganaderia, Pesca y Alimentos. http://www.sagpya.mecon.gov.ar/new/0-0/programas/biotecnologia/marco.php.
  • Schmitz G, Bartsch D, Pretscher P (2003) Selection of relevant non-target herbivores for monitoring the environmental effects of Bt maize pollen. Environ. Biosafety Res. 2: 117–132 [EDP Sciences] [PubMed]
  • Schoener TW(1980) Length-weight regressions in tropical and temperate forest-understory insects. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 73: 106–109
  • Schuler TH, Clark AJ, Clark SJ, Poppy GM, Stewart CN, Denholm I (2005) Laboratory studies of the effects of reduced prey choice caused by Bt plants on a predatory insect. Bull. Entomol. Res. 95: 243–247 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Silby RM, Akçakaya HR, Topping CJ, O'Connor RJ (2005) Population-level assessment of risks of pesticides to birds and mammals in the UK. Ecotoxicol. 14: 863–876 [CrossRef]
  • Singh P (1985) Multiple-Species Rearing Diets. In Moore RF, Singh P, eds, Handbook of Insect Rearing, Elsevier, pp 19–44
  • Stacey D, Graser G, Mead-Briggs M, Raybould A (2006) Testing the impact on non-target organisms of insecticidal proteins expressed in transgenic crops. GMOs in Integrated Plant Production IOBC wprs Bulletin 29: 165–172
  • Stark JD, Banks JE, Vargas R (2004) How risky is risk assessment: The role that life history strategies play in susceptibility of species to stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 732–736 [CrossRef]
  • Stoffels RJ, Karbe S, Paterson RA (2003) Length-mass models for some common New Zealand littoral-benthic macroinvertebrates, with a note on within-taxon variability in parameter values among published models. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 37: 449–460
  • Swanson MB, Davis GA, Kincaid LE, Schultz TW, Bartmess JE, Jones SL, George EL (1997) A screening method for ranking and scoring chemicals by potential human health and environmental impacts. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 16: 372–383 [CrossRef]
  • Topping CJ, Silby RM, Akçakaya HR, Smith GC, Crocker DR (2005) Risk assessment of UK skylark populations using life-history and individual-based landscape models. Ecotoxicol. 14: 925–936 [CrossRef]
  • Towers DJ, Henderson IM, Veltman CJ (1994) Predicting dry weight of New Zealand aquatic macroinvertebrates from linear dimensions. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 28: 159–166 [CrossRef]
  • UKBAP (undated) UK Biodiversity Action Plan. http://www.ukbap.org.uk
  • USEPA (1998) Guidelines for ecological risk assessment, EPA/630/R095/002F. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum. http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/raf/recordisplay.cfm?deid=12460
  • USEPA (2004) Pesticides: Regulating pesticides, introduction to biotechnology. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/regtools/biotech-reg-prod.htm
  • USEPA (2006) 2006-2011 EPA strategic plan. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/ocfo/plan/plan.htm
  • Van Der Werf HMG, Zimmer C (1998) An indicator of pesticide environmental impact based on a fuzzy expert system. Chemosphere 36: 2225–2249 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Van Haelst AG, Hansen BG (2000) Priority setting for existing chemicals: automated data selection routine. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19: 2372–2377 [CrossRef]
  • Walker BH (1992) Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conserv. Biol. 6: 18–23 [CrossRef]
  • Watt JC (1982) New Zealand beetles. N. Z. Entomol. 7: 213–221
  • Williams IH (2002) The EU regulatory framework for GM crops in relation to bees. Bee World 83: 24–35
  • Winterbourn MJ, Gregson KLD, Dolphin CH (2006) Guide to the Aquatic Insects of New Zealand. Entomological Society of New Zealand, Upper Hutt, pp 108
  • Wolt JD, Hellmich RL, Prasifka JR, Sears MK (2006) Global regulatory perspectives regarding transgenic crop risks to non-target insects: The case of Cry1F maize and butterflies. GMOs in Integrated Plant Production IOBC wprs Bulletin 29: 187–194