Free Access
Issue
Environ. Biosafety Res.
Volume 3, Number 3, July-September 2004
Page(s) 135 - 148
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2005001
Published online 15 April 2005
  • Baker J, Preston C (2003) Predicting the spread of herbicide resistance in Australian canola fields. Transgen. Res. 12: 731–737 [CrossRef]
  • Becker H, Karle R, Han S (1992) Environmental variation for outcrossing rates in rapeseed (Brassica napus). Theor. Appl. Genet. 84: 303–306 [PubMed]
  • Beckie H, Hall L, Warwick S (2001) Impact of herbicide resistant crops as weeds in Canada. Proc. Brighton Crop Protect. Conf. – Weeds, pp 135–142
  • Beckie H, Warwick S, Nair H, Séguin-Swartz G (2003) Gene flow in commercial fields of herbicide-resistant canola (Brassica napus). Ecol. Appl. 13: 1276–1294 [CrossRef]
  • Beckie H, Séguin-Swartz G, Nair H, Warwick S, Johnson E (2004) Multiple herbicide-resistant canola (Brassica napus) can be controlled by alternative herbicides. Weed Sci. 52: 152–157 [CrossRef]
  • Beismann H, Roller A, Zeitler R (2003) Assessing the number of transgenic oilseed rape seed in the soil seed bank of former release sites. Asp. App. Biol. 69: 209–215
  • Bilsborrow P, Evans E, Bowman J, Bland B (1998) Contamination of edible double-low oilseed rape crops via pollen transfer from high erucic cultivars. J. Sci. Food Agric. 76: 17–22 [CrossRef]
  • Bing D, Downey R, Rakow G (1995) An evaluation of the potential of intergeneric gene transfer between Brassica napus and Sinapis arvensis. Plant Breed. 114: 481–484
  • Bing D, Downey R, Rakow G (1996) Hybridisation among Brassica napus, B. rapa and B. juncea and their 2 weedy relatives B. nigra and Sinapis arvensis under open pollination conditions in the field. Plant Breed. 115: 470–473 [CrossRef]
  • Blackshaw R, Brandt R, Janzen H, Entz T, Grant C, Derksen D (2003) Differential response of weed species to added nitrogen. Weed Sci. 51: 532–539 [CrossRef]
  • Blackshaw R, Brandt R, Janzen H, Entz T (2004) Weed species response to phosphorus fertilization. Weed Sci. 52: 406–412 [CrossRef]
  • Chadoeuf R, Darmency H, Maillet J, Renard M (1998) Survival of buried seeds of interspecific hybrids between oilseed rape, hoary mustard and wild radish. Field Crops Res. 58: 197–204 [CrossRef]
  • Champolivier J, Gasquez J, Messéan A, Richard-Molard M (1999) Management of transgenic crops within the cropping system. In Lutman P, ed, Gene Flow and Agriculture: Relevance for Transgenic Crops, British Crop Protection Council, pp 233–240
  • Chèvre AM, Eber F, Baranger A, Kerlan P, Festoc G, Vallee P, Renard M (1996) Interspecific gene flow as a component of risk assessment for transgenic Brassicas. Acta Hortic. 407: 169–179
  • Chèvre AM, Eber F, Baranger A, Renard M (1997) Gene flow from transgenic crops. Nature 389: 924 [CrossRef]
  • Chèvre AM, Eber F, Baranger A, Hureau G, Barret P, Picault H, Renard M (1998) Characterisation of backcross generations obtained under field conditions from oilseed rape-wild radish F1 interspecific hybrids: an assessment of transgene dispersal. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97: 90–98 [CrossRef]
  • Chèvre AM, Eber F, Darmency W, Fleury A, Picault I, Letanneur J, Renard M (2000) Assessment of interspecific hybridisation between transgenic oilseed rape and wild radish under normal agronomic conditions. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100: 1233–1239 [CrossRef]
  • Chèvre AM, Ammitzbøll H, Breckling B, Dietz-Pfeilstetter A, Eber F, Fargue A, Gomez-Campo C, Jenczewski E, Jørgensen R, Lavigne C, Meier M, den Nijs H, Pascher K, Seguin-Swartz G, Sweet J, Stewart N, Warwick S (2004) A review on interspecific gene flow from oilseed rape to wild relatives. In den Nijs H, Bartsch D, Sweet J, eds, Introgression from Genetically Modified Plants into Wild Relatives, CABI publishing, pp 235–251
  • Colbach N, Clermont-Dauphin C, Meynard J (2001a) GENESYS: a model of the influence of cropping systems on gene escape from herbicide tolerant rapeseed crops to rape volunteers. I) Temporal evolution of a population of rapeseed volunteers in a field. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 83: 235–253 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [PubMed]
  • Colbach N, Clermont-Dauphin C, Meynard J (2001b) GENESYS: a model of the influence of cropping systems on gene escape from herbicide tolerant rapeseed crops to rape volunteers. II) Genetic exchanges among volunteer and crop populations in a small region. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 83: 255–270 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [PubMed]
  • Crawley M, Brown S (1995) Seed limitation and the dynamics of feral oilseed rape on the M25 motorway. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 259: 49–54 [CrossRef]
  • Crawley M, Hails R, Rees M, Kohn D, Buxton J (1993) Ecology of transgenic oilseed rape in natural habitats. Nature 363: 620–623 [CrossRef]
  • Crawley M, Brown S, Hails R, Kohn D, Rees M (2001) Transgenic crops in natural habitats. Nature 409: 682–683 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Cresswell J, Bassam A, Bell S, Collins S, Kelly T (1995) Predicted pollen dispersal by honey-bees and three species of bumble-bees foraging on oilseed rape – a comparison of three models. Funct. Ecol. 6: 829–841 [CrossRef]
  • Cresswell J, Osborne J, Bell S (2002) A model of pollinator-mediated gene flow between plant populations with numerical solutions for bumblebees pollinating oilseed rape. Oikos 98: 375–384 [CrossRef]
  • Daniell H (2002) Molecular strategies for gene containment in transgenic crops. Nature Biotechnol. 20: 581–586
  • Darmency H, Fleury A (2000) Mating system in Hirschfeldia incana and hybridisation to oilseed rape. Weed Res. 40: 231–238 [CrossRef]
  • Dale P (1992) Spread of engineered genes to wild relatives. Plant Physiol. 100: 13–15 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Dale P (1994) The impact of hybrids between genetically modified crop plants and their related species: general considerations. Mol. Ecol. 3: 31–36 [CrossRef]
  • Deville A, Garnier A, Lecomte J, Adamczyk K, Huet S, Merrien A, Messéan A (2003) Origin and dynamics of feral oilseed rape populations. In Boelt B, ed, 1st European Conference on the Co-existence of Genetically Modified Crops with Conventional and Organic Crops, Research Centre Flakkebjerg, pp 100–101
  • Dietz-Pfeilstetter A, Zwerger P (2003) Pollen and seed dispersal during the large scale cultivation of transgenic oilseed rape. In Boelt B, ed, 1st European Conference on the Co-existence of Genetically Modified Crops with Conventional and Organic Crops, Research Centre Flakkebjerg, pp 97–99
  • Downey R (1999) Gene flow and rape – the Canadian experience. In Lutman P, ed, Gene Flow and Agriculture: Relevance for Transgenic Crops, British Crop Protection Council, pp 109–116
  • Eastham K, Sweet J (2002) Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): the significance of gene flow through pollen transfer. Environmental Issue Report No 28, European Environment Agency
  • Ellstrand N (1992) Gene flow by pollen: implications for plant conservation genetics. Oikos 63: 77–86 [CrossRef]
  • Ellstrand N (2003) Dangerous liaisons? When cultivated plants mate with their wild relatives. In Scheiner S, ed, Synthesis in Ecology and Evolution, the Johns Hopkins University Press
  • Ellstrand N, Hoffman C (1990) Hybridization as an avenue of escape for engineered genes. BioScience 40: 438–442 [CrossRef]
  • Ellstrand N, Prentice H, Hancock J (1999) Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 539–563 [CrossRef]
  • Fredshavn J, Poulsen G, Huybrechts I, Rüdelsheim P (1995) Competitiveness of transgenic oilseed rape. Trans. Res. 4: 142–148 [CrossRef]
  • Frello S, Hansen K, Jensen J, Jørgensen R (1995) Inheritance of rapeseed (Brassica napus)-specific RAPD markers and a transgene in the cross B. juncea × (B. juncea × B. napus). Theor. Appl. Genet. 91: 236–241 [PubMed]
  • Friesen L, Nelson A, Van Acker R (2003) Evidence of contamination of pedigreed canola (Brassica napus) seedlots in western Canada with genetically modified herbicide resistance traits. Agron. J. 95: 1342–1347 [CrossRef]
  • Gray A, Raybould A (1998) Reducing transgene escape routes. Nature 392: 653–654 [CrossRef]
  • Gruber S, Pekrun C, Claupein W (2004) Population dynamics of volunteer oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) affected by tillage. Eur. J. Agron. 20: 351–361 [CrossRef]
  • Guéritaine G, Sester M, Eber F, Chèvre AM, Darmency H (2002) Fitness of backcross six of hybrids between transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). Mol. Ecol. 11: 1419–1426 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Gulden R (2003) Secondary seed dormancy and the seed bank ecology of Brassica napus L. in western Canada. Ph.D. thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
  • Gulden R, Shirtliffe S, Thomas A (2003a) Harvest losses of canola (Brassica napus) cause large seed bank inputs. Weed Sci. 51: 83–86 [CrossRef]
  • Gulden R, Shirtliffe S, Thomas A (2003b) Secondary seed dormancy prolongs persistence of volunteer canola in western Canada. Weed Sci. 51: 904–913 [CrossRef]
  • Hails R, Rees M, Kohn D, Crawley M (1997) Burial and seed survival in Brassica napus subsp. Oleifera and Sinapsis arvensis including a comparison of transgenic and non-transgenic lines of the crop. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 264: 1–7 [CrossRef]
  • Hall L, Topinka K, Huffman J, Davis L, Good A (2000) Pollen flow between herbicide-resistant Brassica napus is the cause of multiple-resistant B. napus volunteers. Weed Sci. 48: 688–694 [CrossRef]
  • Hall L, Good A, Beckie H, Warwick S (2003) Gene flow in herbicide-resistant canola (Brassica napus): the Canadian experience. In Lelley T, Balász E, Tepfer M, eds, Ecological Impact of GMO Dissemination in Agro-Ecosystems, Proceedings of an International OECD Workshop, pp 57– 66
  • Hansen L, Siegismund H, Jørgensen R (2001) Introgression between oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) and its weedy relative B. rapa L. in a natural population. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 48: 621–627 [CrossRef]
  • Hauser T, Jørgensen R, Østergård H (1998a) Fitness of backcross and F2 hybrids between weedy Brassica rapa and oilseed rape (B. napus). Heredity 81: 436–443 [CrossRef]
  • Hauser T, Shaw R, Østergård H (1998b) Fitness of F1 hybrids between weedy Brassica rapa and oilseed rape (B. napus). Heredity 81: 429–435 [CrossRef]
  • Hauser T, Damgaard C, Jørgensen R (2003) Frequency dependent fitness of hybrids between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and weedy B. rapa (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 90: 571–578 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Hobson R, Bruce D (2002) Seed loss when cutting a standing crop of oilseed rape with tow types of combine harvester header. Biosyst. Eng. 81: 281–286 [CrossRef]
  • Hoffman C (1990) Ecological risks of genetic engineering of crop plants. BioScience 40: 434–437 [CrossRef]
  • Ingram J (2000) Report on the separation distances required to ensure cross-pollination is below specified limits in non-seed crops of sugar beet, maize and oilseed rape. MAFF Project No RG0123
  • Jenczewski E, Ronfort J, Chèvre AM (2003) Crop-to-wild gene flow, introgression and possible fitness effects of transgenes. Environ. Biosafety Res. 2: 9–24 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed]
  • Jørgensen R, Andersen B, Hauser T, Landbo L, Mikkelsen T, Østergård H (1998) Introgression of crop genes from oilseed rape (Brassica napus) to related wild species – an avenue for the escape of engineered genes. Acta Hortic. 459: 211–217
  • Jørgensen R, Andersen B, Snow A, Hauser T (1999) Ecological risks of growing genetically modified crops. Plant Biotechnol. 16: 69–71
  • Jørgensen R, Hauser T, Hansen L, Siegismund H, Andersen B (2003) Gene flow from oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and beet (Beta vulgaris) to wild relatives: effects of herbicide tolerant cultivars. In Lelley T, Balász E, Tepfer M, eds, Ecological Impact of GMO Dissemination in Agro-Ecosystems, Proceedings of an International OECD Workshop, pp 67–75
  • Jørgensen R, Ammitzbøll H, Hansen L, Johannessen M, Andersen B, Hauser T (2004) Gene introgression and consequences in Brassica. In den Nijs H, Bartsch D, Sweet J, eds, Introgression from Genetically Modified Plants into Wild Relatives, CABI publishing, pp 253–277
  • Kareiva P, Morris W, Jacobi C (1994) Studying and managing the risk of cross-fertilisation between transgenic crops and wild relatives. Mol. Ecol. 3: 15–21 [CrossRef]
  • Klinger T, Ellstrand N (1999) Transgene movement via gene flow: recommendations for improved biosafety assessment. In Amman K, Jacot Y, Simonsen V, Kjellsson G, eds, Methods for risk assessment of transgenic plants. III Ecological risks and prospects of transgenic plants, Birkhäuser Verlag Basel, pp 129–140
  • Lavigne C, Klein E, Vallée P, Pierre J, Godelle B, Renard, M (1998) A pollen-dispersal experiment with transgenic oilseed rape. Estimation of the average pollen dispersal of an individual plant within a field. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96: 886–896 [CrossRef]
  • Lefol E, Danielou V, Darmency H (1996a) Predicting hybridisation between transgenic oilseed rape and wild mustard. Field Crops Res. 45: 153–161 [CrossRef]
  • Lefol E, Fleury A, Darmency H (1996b) Gene dispersal from transgenic crops. II. Hybridisation between oilseed rape and the hoary mustard. Sex. Plant Reprod. 9: 189–196 [CrossRef]
  • López-Granados F, Lutman P (1998) Effect of environmental conditions on the dormancy and germination of volunteer oilseed rape seed (Brassica napus). Weed Sci. 46: 419–426
  • Lutman P (2003) Co-existence of conventional, organic and GM crops – role of temporal and spatial behaviour of seeds. In Boelt B, ed, 1st European Conference on the Co-existence of Genetically Modified Crops with Conventional and Organic Crops, Research Centre Flakkebjerg, pp 33–42
  • Lutman P, Cussans G, Wright K, Wilson B, Wright G, Lawson H (2002) The persistence of seeds of 16 weed species over six years in two arable fields. Weed Res. 42: 231–241 [CrossRef]
  • Lutman P, Freeman S, Pekrun C (2004) The long-term persistence of seeds of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in arable fields. J. Agricult. Sci. 141: 231–240 [CrossRef]
  • Messéan A (1997) Management of herbicide tolerant crops in Europe. Proc. Brighton Crop Protect. Conf. – Weeds, pp 947–954
  • Mesquida J, Renard M (1982) Study of the pollen dispersal by wind and of the importance of wind pollination in rapeseed (Brassica napus var. oleifera Metzger). Apidologie 4: 353–366 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Momoh E, Zhou W, Kristiansson B (2002) Variation in the development of secondary dormancy in oilseed rape genotypes under conditions of stress. Weed Res. 42: 446–455 [CrossRef]
  • Morgan C, Bruce D, Child R, Ladbrooke Z, Arthur A (1998) Genetic variation for pod shatter resistance among lines of oilseed rape developed from synthetic B. napus. Field Crops Res. 58: 153–165
  • Moyes C, Lilley J, Casais C, Cole S, Haeger P, Dale P (2002) Barriers to gene flow from oilseed rape (Brassica napus) into populations of Sinapis arvensis. Mol. Ecol. 11: 103–112
  • Norris C, Sweet J (2002) Monitoring large scale releases of genetically modified crops (EPG 1/5/84) incorporating report on project EPG 1/5/30: Monitoring releases of genetically modified crop plants
  • Norris C, Simpson E, Sweet J, Thomas J (1999) Monitoring weediness and persistence of genetically modified oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in the UK. In Lutman P, ed, Gene Flow and Agriculture: Relevance for Transgenic Crops, British Crop Protection Council, pp 255–260
  • Norris C, Sweet J, Parker J, Law J (2004) Implications for hybridization and introgression between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and wild turnip (B. rapa) from an agricultural perspective. In den Nijs H, Bartsch D, Sweet J, eds, Introgression from Genetically Modified Plants into Wild Relatives, CABI publishing, pp 107–123
  • Orson J (2002) Gene stacking in herbicide tolerant oilseed rape: lessons from the North America experience. English Nature Research Reports No 443, English Nature
  • Orson J, Oldfield J (1999) Gene flow and the practical management of genetically modified crops in the UK. In Lutman P, ed, Gene Flow and Agriculture: Relevance for Transgenic Crops, British Crop Protection Council, pp 247–252
  • Osborne J, Clark S, Morris R, Williams I, Riley J, Smith A, Reynolds D, Edwards A (1999) A landscape-scale study of bumblebee foraging range and constancy, using harmonic radar. J. Appl. Ecol. 36: 519–533 [CrossRef]
  • Paul E, Thompson C, Dunwell J (1995) Gene dispersal from genetically modified oilseed rape in the field. Euphytica 81: 283–289 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Pekrun C, Lutman P (1998) The influence of post-harvest cultivation on the persistence of volunteer oilseed rape. Asp. App. Biol. 51: 113–118
  • Pekrun C, Lutman P, Baeumer K (1997a) Induction of secondary dormancy in rape seeds (Brassica napus L.) by prolonged inhibition under conditions of water stress or oxygen deficiency in darkness. Eur. J. Agron. 6: 245–255 [CrossRef]
  • Pekrun C, Potter T, Lutman P (1997b) Genotypic variation in the development of secondary dormancy in oilseed rape and its impact on the persistence of volunteer rape. Proc. Brighton Crop Protect. Conf. – Weeds, pp 243–247
  • Pekrun C, Hewitt J, Lutman P (1998) Cultural control of volunteer oilseed rape (Brassica napus). J. Agricult. Sci. 130: 155–163 [CrossRef]
  • Pekrun C, Gruber S, Lutman P, Claupein W (2003) The potential impact of volunteer rape as a link between previous and current rape crops – its relevance for managing HT-rape. In Boelt B, ed, 1st European Conference on the Co-existence of Genetically Modified Crops with Conventional and Organic Crops, Research Centre Flakkebjerg, pp 187–189
  • Pertl M, Hauser T, Damgaard C, Jørgensen R (2002) Male fitness of oilseed rape (Brassica napus), weedy B. rapa and their F1 hybrids when pollinating B. rapa seeds. Heredity 89: 212–218 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Pessel D, Lecomte J, Emeriau V, Krouti M, Messéan A, Gouyon H (2001) Persistance of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) outside of cultivated fields. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102: 841–846 [CrossRef]
  • Price J, Hobson R, Neale M, Bruce D (1996) Seed losses in commercial harvesting of oilseed rape. J. agric. Engng. Res. 65: 183–191 [CrossRef]
  • Rajani S, Sundaresan V (2001) The Arabidopsis myc/bHLH gene Alcatraz enables cell separation in fruit dehiscence. Curr. Biol. 11: 1914–1922 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Ramsay G, Thompson C, Neilson S, Mackay G (1999) Honeybees as vectors of GM oilseed rape pollen. In Lutman P, ed, Gene Flow and Agriculture: Relevance for Transgenic Crops, British Crop Protection Council, pp 209–214
  • Ramsay G, Thompson C, Squire G (2003) Quantifying landscape-scale gene flow in oilseed rape. DEFRA Project RG0216
  • Raybould A, Gray A (1993) Genetically modified crops and hybridisation with wild relatives: a UK perspective. J. Appl. Ecol. 30: 199–219 [CrossRef]
  • Rieger M, Preston C, Powles S (1999) Risks of gene flow from transgenic herbicide-resistant canola (Brassica napus) to weedy relatives in southern Australian cropping systems. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 50: 115–128 [CrossRef]
  • Rieger M, Potter T, Preston C, Powles S (2001) Hybridization between Brassica napus L. and Raphanus raphanistrum L. under agronomic field conditions. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103: 555–560 [CrossRef]
  • Rieger M, Lamond M, Preston C, Powles S, Roush R (2002) Pollen-mediated movement of herbicide resistance between commercial canola fields. Science 296: 86–88
  • Roller A, Beismann H, Albrecht H (2003) The influence of soil cultivation on the seed bank of GM-herbicide tolerant and conventional oilseed rape. Asp. App. Biol. 69: 131–135
  • Salisbury P (2002) Genetically modified canola in Australia: agronomic and environmental considerations. In Downey R, ed, Australian Oilseeds Federation
  • Scheffler J, Dale P (1994) Opportunities for gene transfer from transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Trans. Res. 3: 263–278 [CrossRef]
  • Scheffler J, Parkinson R, Dale P (1993) Frequency and distance of pollen dispersal from transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Trans. Res. 2: 356–364 [CrossRef]
  • Scheffler J, Parkinson R, Dale P (1995) Evaluating the effectiveness of isolation distance for field plots of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) using a herbicide resistance transgene as a selectable marker. Plant Breed. 114: 317–321 [CrossRef]
  • Schiemann J (2003) Co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming. Environ. Biosafety Res. 2: 213–217 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed]
  • Schlink S (1998) 10 years survival of rape seed (Brassica napus L.) in soil. Z. Pflanzenk. Pflanzen. XVI, 169–172
  • Scott S, Wilkinson M (1998) Transgene risk is low. Nature 393: 320 [CrossRef]
  • Scott S, Wilkinson M (1999) Low probability of chloroplast movement from oilseed rape (Brassica napus) into wild Brassica rapa. Nature Biotechnol. 17: 390–392
  • Senoir I, Dale P (2002) Herbicide-tolerant crops in agriculture: oilseed rape as a case study. Plant Breed. 121: 97–107 [CrossRef]
  • Senior I, Moyes C, Dale P (2002) Herbicide sensitivity of transgenic multiple herbicide-tolerant oilseed rape. Pest Manage. Sci. 58: 405–412 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Shirtliffe S, Entz M (2004) Chaff collection reduces seed dispersal of wild oat by a combine harvester. Weed Sci. (in press)
  • Simard M, Légère A, Pageau D, Lajeunnesse J, Warwick S (2002) The frequency and persistence of canola (Brassica napus) volunteers in Québec cropping systems. Weed Technol. 16: 433–439 [CrossRef]
  • Simpson E, Sweet J (2001) Consequence analysis of the impact on agriculture and the environment of the release of herbicide tolerant oilseed rape. MAFF report RG0217
  • Simpson E, Sweet J (2004) Out-crossing between field scale areas of genetically modified herbicide tolerant and other winter oilseed rape cultivars. Pl. Gen. Resources J. (in press)
  • Simpson E, Norris C, Law J, Thomas J, Sweet J (1999) Gene flow in genetically modified herbicide tolerant oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in the UK. In Lutman P, ed, Gene Flow and Agriculture: Relevance for Transgenic Crops, British Crop Protection Council, pp 75–81
  • Snow A (2002) Transgenic crops – why gene flow matters? Nature Biotechnol. 20: 542
  • Snow A, Palma P (1997) Commercialization of transgenic plants. BioScience 47: 86–96 [CrossRef]
  • Snow A, Andersen B, Jørgensen R (1999) Costs of transgenic herbicide resistance introgressed from Brassica napus into weedy B. rapa. Mol. Ecol. 8: 605–615
  • Squire G, Crawford J, Ramsay G, Thompson C, Bown J (1999) Gene flow at landscape level. In Lutman P, ed, Gene Flow and Agriculture: Relevance for Transgenic Crops, British Crop Protection Council, pp 57–64
  • Squire G, Begg G, Askew M (2003) The potential for oilseed rape feral (volunteer) weeds to cause impurities in later oilseed rape crops. DEFRA project RG0114
  • Sweet J (2003) Pollen dispersal and cross-pollination. In Boelt B, ed, 1st European Conference on the Co-existence of Genetically Modified Crops with Conventional and Organic Crops, Research Centre Flakkebjerg, pp 21–32
  • Sweet J, Shepperson R, Thomas J, Simpson E (1997) The impact of releases of genetically modified herbicide tolerant oilseed rape in the UK. Proc. Brighton Crop Protect. Conf. – Weeds, pp 1291–1302
  • Thomas D, Breve M, Raymer P (1991) Influence of timing and method of harvest on rapeseed yield. J. Prod. Agric. 4: 266–272
  • Thompson C, Squire G, Mackay G, Bradshaw J, Crawford J, Ramsay G (1999) Regional patterns of gene flow and its consequences for GM oilseed rape. In Lutman P, ed, Gene Flow and Agriculture: Relevance for Transgenic Crops, British Crop Protection Council, pp 95–100
  • Tiedje J, Colwell R, Grossman Y, Hodson R, Lenski R, Mack R, Regal P (1989) The planned introduction of genetically modified organisms: ecological considerations and recommendations. Ecology 70: 298–315 [CrossRef]
  • Timmons A, O’Brien E, Charters Y, Dubbels S, Wilkinson M (1995) Assessing the risks of wind pollination from fields of genetically modified Brassica napus ssp. oleifera. Euphytica 85: 417–423
  • Timmons A, Charters Y, Crawford J, Burn D, Scott S, Dubbels S, Wilson N, Robertson A, O’Brian E, Squire G, Wilkinson M (1996) Risks from transgenic crops. Nature 380: 487 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • van Tienderen P (2004) Hybridization in nature: lessons for the introgression of transgene into wild relatives. In: den Nijs H, Bartsch D, Sweet J, eds, Introgression from Genetically Modified Plants into Wild Relatives, CABI publishing, pp 7–25
  • Walklate P, Hunt J, Higson H, Sweet J (2004) A model of pollen-mediated gene flow for oilseed rape. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 271: 441–449 [CrossRef]
  • Warwick S, Beckie H, Small E (1999) Transgenic crops: new weed problems for Canada? Phytoprotection 80: 71–84
  • Warwick S, Simard M-J, Légère A, Beckie H, Braun L, Zhu B, Mason P, Séguin-Swartz G, Stewart N (2003) Hybridization between transgenic Brassica napus L. and its wild relatives: B. rapa L., Raphanus raphanistrum L., Sinapis arvensis L., and Erucastrum gallicum (Willd.) O.E. Schulz. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 528–539 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Warwick S, Beckie H, Simard M-J, Légère A, Nair H, Séguin-Swartz G (2004) Environmental and agronomic consequences of herbicide-resistant (HR) canola in Canada. In den Nijs H, Bartsch D, Sweet J, eds, Introgression from Genetically Modified Plants into Wild Relatives, CABI publishing, pp 323–337
  • Wilkinson M, Charters Y, Timmons A, Dubbels S, Robertson A, Wilson N, Scott S, O'Brian E, Lawson H (1995) Problems of risk assessment with genetically modified oilseed rape. Proc. Brighton Crop Protect. Conf. – Weeds, pp 1035–1044
  • Wilkinson M, Davenport I, Charters Y, Jones A, Allainguillaume J, Butler H, Mason D, Raybould A (2000) A direct regional scale estimate of transgene movement from genetically modified oilseed rape to its wild progenitors. Mol. Ecol. 9: 983–991 [CrossRef] [PubMed]