Free Access
Environ. Biosafety Res.
Volume 2, Number 2, April-June 2003
Page(s) 105 - 115
Published online 15 June 2003
  • Bartsch D, Brand U (1998) Saline soil condition decreases rhizomania infection of Beta vulgaris. J. Plant Pathol. 80: 219-223
  • Bartsch D, Ellstrand NC (1999) Genetic evidence for the origin of Californian wild beets (genus Beta). Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 1120-1130 [CrossRef]
  • Bartsch D, Schmidt M (1997) Influence of sugar beet breeding on populations of Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima in Italy. J. Veg. Sci. 8: 81-84 [CrossRef]
  • Bartsch D, Schuphan I (2002) Lessons we can learn from ecological biosafety research. J. Biotechnol. 98: 71-77 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Bartsch D, Schmidt M, Pohl-Orf M, Haag C, Schuphan I (1996) Competitiveness of transgenic sugar beet resistant to beet necrotic yellow vein virus and potential impact on wild beet populations. Mol. Ecol. 5: 199-205
  • Bartsch D, Lehnen M, Clegg J, Pohl-Orf M, Schuphan I, Ellstrand NC (1999) Impact of gene flow from cultivated beet on genetic diversity of wild sea beet populations. Mol. Ecol. 8: 1733-1741 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Bartsch D, Brand U, Morak C, Pohl-Orf M, Schuphan I, Ellstrand NC (2001) Biosafety of hybrids between transgenic virus-resistant sugar beet and Swiss chard. Ecol. Appl. 11: 142-147 [CrossRef]
  • Boudry P, Mörchen M, Saumitou-Laprade P, Vernet P, Van Dijk H (1993) The origin and evolution of weed beets, consequences for the breeding and release of herbicide-resistant transgenic sugar-beets. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87: 471-478 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Boudry P, McCombie H, Van Dijk H (2002) Vernalization requirement of wild beet Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima: among population variation and its adaptive significance. J. Ecol. 90: 693-793 [CrossRef]
  • Braun R (2002) People's concerns about biotechnology: some problems and some solutions. J. Biotechnol. 98: 3-8 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Champion GT (2000) The biology of weed beet. Brit. Sugar Beet Rev. 68: 53-55.
  • Crawley MJ, Brown SL, Hails RS, Kohn D, Rees M (2001) Transgenic crops in natural habitats. Nature 408: 682-683 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Darmency H (1994) The impact of hybrids between genetically modified crop plants and their related species: introgression and weediness. Mol. Ecol. 3: 37-44 [CrossRef]
  • Darmency H (1997) Gene flow between crops and weeds: Risk for new herbicide resistances weeds? In De Prado R, Jorrin J, Garcia-Torres L, eds, Weed and Crop Resistance to Herbi- cides. Kluver Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 239-248
  • Desplanque B, Boudry P, Broomberg K, Saumitou-Laprade P, Cuguen J, Van Dijk H (1999) Genetic diversity and gene flow between wild, cultivated and weedy forms of Beta vulgaris L. (Chenopodiaceae), assessed by RFLP and microsatellite markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98: 1194-1201 [CrossRef]
  • Desplanque B, Viard F, Forcioli D, Bernard J, Saumitou- Laprade P, Cuguen J, Van Dijk H (2000) The linkage disequilibrium between cpDNA and mtDNA haplotypes in Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima (L.): the usefulness of both genomes for population genetic studies. Mol. Ecol. 9: 141-154 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Desplanque B, Hautekeete N, Van Dijk H (2002) Transgenic weed beets: possible, probable, avoidable? J. Appl. Ecol. 39: 561-571 [CrossRef]
  • Doney DL, Whitney ED, Terry J, Frese L, Fitzgerald P (1990) The distribution and dispersal of Beta vulgaris L. ssp. maritima germplasm in England, Wales, and Ireland. J. Sugar Beet Res. 27: 29-37 [CrossRef]
  • Driessen S, Pohl M, Bartsch D (2001) RAPD-PCR analysis of the genetic origin of sea beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima) at Germany's Baltic Sea coast. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2: 341-349 [CrossRef]
  • Ellstrand NC, Prentice HC, Hancock JF (1999) Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 539-563 [CrossRef]
  • Eriksson O (1996) Regional dynamics of plants: a review of evidence for remnant, source-sink and metapopulations. Oikos 77: 248-258 [CrossRef]
  • Ford-Lloyd BV (1986) Infraspecific variation in wild and cultivated beets and its effect upon infraspecific classification. In Styles BT, ed, Infraspecific classification of wild and cultivated plants. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 331-334
  • Ford-Lloyd BV, Hawkes JG (1986) Weed beets, their origin and classification. Acta Horticultura 82: 399-401
  • Ford-Lloyd BV, Williams JT (1975) A revision of Beta section Vulgares (Chenopodiaceae), with new light on the origin of cultivated beets. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 71: 89-102 [CrossRef]
  • Frese L, Desprez B, Ziegler D (2001) Potential of genetic resources and breeding strategies for base-broadening in Beta. In Cooper HD, Spillane C, Hodgkin T, eds, Broadening the genetic base of crop production. IPGRI/FAO, Rome, 2001, pp 295-309
  • Hautekeete N, Piquot Y, Van Dijk H (2002) Life span in Beta vulgaris maritima: the impacts of disturbance and of age at first reproduction. J. Ecol. 90: 508-516 [CrossRef]
  • Lange W, Brandenburg WA, de Bock TSM (1999) Taxonomy and cultonomy of beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 130: 81-96 [CrossRef]
  • Laporte V, Viard F, Béna G, Valero M, Cuguen J (2001) The spatial structure of sexual and cytonuclear polymorphism in the gynodioecious Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima at a local scale. Genetics 157: 1699-1710 [PubMed]
  • Letschert JPW (1993) Beta section Beta: biogeographical patterns of variation and taxonomy. Wageningen Agricultural University Publications 93: 1-153
  • Mücher T, Hesse P, Pohl-Orf M, Ellstrand NC, Bartsch D (2000) Characterization of weed beets in Germany and Italy. J. Sugar Beet Res. 37: 19-38 [CrossRef]
  • Nickson TE, Head GP (1999) Environmental monitoring of genetically modified crops. J. Environ. Monit. 1: 101-105 [CrossRef]
  • Ober E, Luterbacher M (2002) Genotypic variation for drought tolerance in Beta vulgaris. Ann. Bot. 89: 917-924 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Pohl-Orf M, Morak C, Wehres U, Saeglitz C, Driessen S, Lehnen M, Hesse P, Mücher T, von Soosten C, Schuphan I, Bartsch D (2000) The environmental impact of gene flow from sugar beet to wild beet - an ecological comparison of transgenic and natural virus tolerance genes. In Fairbairn C, Scoles G, McHughen A, eds, Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms, July 2000, Saskatoon, Canada, pp 51-55
  • Raybould AF, Gray AJ (1993) Genetically modified crops and hybridization with wild relatives: a UK perspective. J. Appl. Ecol. 30: 199-219 [CrossRef]
  • Raybould AF, Mogg RJ (1996) The genetic structure of Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima (sea beet) populations: RFLPs and isozymes show different patterns of gene flow. Heredity 77: 245-250 [CrossRef]
  • Raybould AF, Mogg RJ, Gliddon CJ (1997) The genetic structure of Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima (sea beet) populations. II. Differences in gene flow estimated from RFLP and isozyme loci are habitat-specific. Heredity 78: 535-538
  • Raybould AF, Mogg RJ, Aldam C, Gliddon CJ, Thorpe RS, Clarke RT (1998) The genetic structure of sea beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima) populations. III. Detection of isolation by distance at microsatellite loci. Heredity 80: 127-132 [CrossRef]
  • Reboud X, Gasquez J, Darmency H (1999) A multisite-cooperative research programme on risk assessment of transgenic crops. In Ammann K, Jacot Y, Simonsen V, Kjellsson G, eds, Methods for Risk Assessment of Transgenic Plant III. Ecological risks and prospects of transgenic plants, where do we go from here? A dialogue between biotech industry and science. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp 17-20
  • Saeglitz C, Bartsch D (2002) Gene flow from transgenic plants. AgBiotechNet 4: ABN 084
  • Saeglitz C, Pohl M, Bartsch D (2000) Monitoring gene escape from transgenic sugar beet using cytoplasmic male sterile bait plants. Mol. Ecol. 9: 2035-2040 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Soukup J, Holec J, Vejl P, Skupinova S, Sedlak P (2002) Diversity and distribution of weed beet in the Czech Republic. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection (z pflanzenkr pflanzenschutz) 18: 67-74
  • Stevanato P (1999) Ottavio Munerati - 50 anni dopo. Proceedings Accademia dei Concordi: 1-83
  • Suter GW (1993) Environmental surveillance, In Suter GW, ed, Ecological Risk Assessment. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, pp 377-383
  • Tufto J, Raybould AF, Hindar K, Engen S (1998) Analysis of Genetic Structure and Dispersal Patterns in a Population of Sea Beet. Genetics 149: 1975-1985 [PubMed]
  • Van Dijk H, Boudry P, McCombie H, Vernet P (1997) Flowering time in wild beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima) along a latitudinal cline. Acta Oecologia 18: 47-60 [CrossRef]
  • Viard F, Bernard J, Desplanque B (2002) Crop-weed interactions in the Beta vulgaris complex at a local scale: allelic diversity and gene flow within sugar beet fields. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104: 688-697 [CrossRef] [PubMed]