EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 2 / No 2 (April-June 2003) Environ. Biosafety Res., 2 2 (2003) 105-115 References
Free Access
Issue
Environ. Biosafety Res.
Volume 2, Number 2, April-June 2003
Page(s) 105 - 115
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2003006
Published online 15 June 2003
  • Bartsch D, Brand U (1998) Saline soil condition decreases rhizomania infection of Beta vulgaris. J. Plant Pathol. 80: 219-223 [Google Scholar]
  • Bartsch D, Ellstrand NC (1999) Genetic evidence for the origin of Californian wild beets (genus Beta). Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 1120-1130 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bartsch D, Schmidt M (1997) Influence of sugar beet breeding on populations of Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima in Italy. J. Veg. Sci. 8: 81-84 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bartsch D, Schuphan I (2002) Lessons we can learn from ecological biosafety research. J. Biotechnol. 98: 71-77 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bartsch D, Schmidt M, Pohl-Orf M, Haag C, Schuphan I (1996) Competitiveness of transgenic sugar beet resistant to beet necrotic yellow vein virus and potential impact on wild beet populations. Mol. Ecol. 5: 199-205 [Google Scholar]
  • Bartsch D, Lehnen M, Clegg J, Pohl-Orf M, Schuphan I, Ellstrand NC (1999) Impact of gene flow from cultivated beet on genetic diversity of wild sea beet populations. Mol. Ecol. 8: 1733-1741 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bartsch D, Brand U, Morak C, Pohl-Orf M, Schuphan I, Ellstrand NC (2001) Biosafety of hybrids between transgenic virus-resistant sugar beet and Swiss chard. Ecol. Appl. 11: 142-147 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boudry P, Mörchen M, Saumitou-Laprade P, Vernet P, Van Dijk H (1993) The origin and evolution of weed beets, consequences for the breeding and release of herbicide-resistant transgenic sugar-beets. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87: 471-478 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Boudry P, McCombie H, Van Dijk H (2002) Vernalization requirement of wild beet Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima: among population variation and its adaptive significance. J. Ecol. 90: 693-793 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Braun R (2002) People's concerns about biotechnology: some problems and some solutions. J. Biotechnol. 98: 3-8 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Champion GT (2000) The biology of weed beet. Brit. Sugar Beet Rev. 68: 53-55. [Google Scholar]
  • Crawley MJ, Brown SL, Hails RS, Kohn D, Rees M (2001) Transgenic crops in natural habitats. Nature 408: 682-683 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Darmency H (1994) The impact of hybrids between genetically modified crop plants and their related species: introgression and weediness. Mol. Ecol. 3: 37-44 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Darmency H (1997) Gene flow between crops and weeds: Risk for new herbicide resistances weeds? In De Prado R, Jorrin J, Garcia-Torres L, eds, Weed and Crop Resistance to Herbi- cides. Kluver Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 239-248 [Google Scholar]
  • Desplanque B, Boudry P, Broomberg K, Saumitou-Laprade P, Cuguen J, Van Dijk H (1999) Genetic diversity and gene flow between wild, cultivated and weedy forms of Beta vulgaris L. (Chenopodiaceae), assessed by RFLP and microsatellite markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98: 1194-1201 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Desplanque B, Viard F, Forcioli D, Bernard J, Saumitou- Laprade P, Cuguen J, Van Dijk H (2000) The linkage disequilibrium between cpDNA and mtDNA haplotypes in Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima (L.): the usefulness of both genomes for population genetic studies. Mol. Ecol. 9: 141-154 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Desplanque B, Hautekeete N, Van Dijk H (2002) Transgenic weed beets: possible, probable, avoidable? J. Appl. Ecol. 39: 561-571 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Doney DL, Whitney ED, Terry J, Frese L, Fitzgerald P (1990) The distribution and dispersal of Beta vulgaris L. ssp. maritima germplasm in England, Wales, and Ireland. J. Sugar Beet Res. 27: 29-37 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Driessen S, Pohl M, Bartsch D (2001) RAPD-PCR analysis of the genetic origin of sea beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima) at Germany's Baltic Sea coast. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2: 341-349 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ellstrand NC, Prentice HC, Hancock JF (1999) Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 539-563 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Eriksson O (1996) Regional dynamics of plants: a review of evidence for remnant, source-sink and metapopulations. Oikos 77: 248-258 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ford-Lloyd BV (1986) Infraspecific variation in wild and cultivated beets and its effect upon infraspecific classification. In Styles BT, ed, Infraspecific classification of wild and cultivated plants. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 331-334 [Google Scholar]
  • Ford-Lloyd BV, Hawkes JG (1986) Weed beets, their origin and classification. Acta Horticultura 82: 399-401 [Google Scholar]
  • Ford-Lloyd BV, Williams JT (1975) A revision of Beta section Vulgares (Chenopodiaceae), with new light on the origin of cultivated beets. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 71: 89-102 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Frese L, Desprez B, Ziegler D (2001) Potential of genetic resources and breeding strategies for base-broadening in Beta. In Cooper HD, Spillane C, Hodgkin T, eds, Broadening the genetic base of crop production. IPGRI/FAO, Rome, 2001, pp 295-309 [Google Scholar]
  • Hautekeete N, Piquot Y, Van Dijk H (2002) Life span in Beta vulgaris maritima: the impacts of disturbance and of age at first reproduction. J. Ecol. 90: 508-516 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lange W, Brandenburg WA, de Bock TSM (1999) Taxonomy and cultonomy of beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 130: 81-96 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Laporte V, Viard F, Béna G, Valero M, Cuguen J (2001) The spatial structure of sexual and cytonuclear polymorphism in the gynodioecious Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima at a local scale. Genetics 157: 1699-1710 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Letschert JPW (1993) Beta section Beta: biogeographical patterns of variation and taxonomy. Wageningen Agricultural University Publications 93: 1-153 [Google Scholar]
  • Mücher T, Hesse P, Pohl-Orf M, Ellstrand NC, Bartsch D (2000) Characterization of weed beets in Germany and Italy. J. Sugar Beet Res. 37: 19-38 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nickson TE, Head GP (1999) Environmental monitoring of genetically modified crops. J. Environ. Monit. 1: 101-105 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ober E, Luterbacher M (2002) Genotypic variation for drought tolerance in Beta vulgaris. Ann. Bot. 89: 917-924 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pohl-Orf M, Morak C, Wehres U, Saeglitz C, Driessen S, Lehnen M, Hesse P, Mücher T, von Soosten C, Schuphan I, Bartsch D (2000) The environmental impact of gene flow from sugar beet to wild beet - an ecological comparison of transgenic and natural virus tolerance genes. In Fairbairn C, Scoles G, McHughen A, eds, Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms, July 2000, Saskatoon, Canada, pp 51-55 [Google Scholar]
  • Raybould AF, Gray AJ (1993) Genetically modified crops and hybridization with wild relatives: a UK perspective. J. Appl. Ecol. 30: 199-219 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Raybould AF, Mogg RJ (1996) The genetic structure of Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima (sea beet) populations: RFLPs and isozymes show different patterns of gene flow. Heredity 77: 245-250 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Raybould AF, Mogg RJ, Gliddon CJ (1997) The genetic structure of Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima (sea beet) populations. II. Differences in gene flow estimated from RFLP and isozyme loci are habitat-specific. Heredity 78: 535-538 [Google Scholar]
  • Raybould AF, Mogg RJ, Aldam C, Gliddon CJ, Thorpe RS, Clarke RT (1998) The genetic structure of sea beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima) populations. III. Detection of isolation by distance at microsatellite loci. Heredity 80: 127-132 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reboud X, Gasquez J, Darmency H (1999) A multisite-cooperative research programme on risk assessment of transgenic crops. In Ammann K, Jacot Y, Simonsen V, Kjellsson G, eds, Methods for Risk Assessment of Transgenic Plant III. Ecological risks and prospects of transgenic plants, where do we go from here? A dialogue between biotech industry and science. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp 17-20 [Google Scholar]
  • Saeglitz C, Bartsch D (2002) Gene flow from transgenic plants. AgBiotechNet 4: ABN 084 [Google Scholar]
  • Saeglitz C, Pohl M, Bartsch D (2000) Monitoring gene escape from transgenic sugar beet using cytoplasmic male sterile bait plants. Mol. Ecol. 9: 2035-2040 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Soukup J, Holec J, Vejl P, Skupinova S, Sedlak P (2002) Diversity and distribution of weed beet in the Czech Republic. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection (z pflanzenkr pflanzenschutz) 18: 67-74 [Google Scholar]
  • Stevanato P (1999) Ottavio Munerati - 50 anni dopo. Proceedings Accademia dei Concordi: 1-83 [Google Scholar]
  • Suter GW (1993) Environmental surveillance, In Suter GW, ed, Ecological Risk Assessment. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, pp 377-383 [Google Scholar]
  • Tufto J, Raybould AF, Hindar K, Engen S (1998) Analysis of Genetic Structure and Dispersal Patterns in a Population of Sea Beet. Genetics 149: 1975-1985 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Dijk H, Boudry P, McCombie H, Vernet P (1997) Flowering time in wild beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima) along a latitudinal cline. Acta Oecologia 18: 47-60 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Viard F, Bernard J, Desplanque B (2002) Crop-weed interactions in the Beta vulgaris complex at a local scale: allelic diversity and gene flow within sugar beet fields. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104: 688-697 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]