EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Environ. Biosafety Res., 5 3 (2006) 119-125 Article references

Articles citing this article

The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).

Cited article:

Problem formulation for a small-scale field study of non-gene drive, genetically modified, male bias mosquitoes in Burkina Faso

Keith R. Hayes and Geoffrey R. Hosack
Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 31 (5-6) 833 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2025.2484229

Advancements in dsRNA-based approaches: a comprehensive review on potent strategies for plant disease management

D. S. Srimahesvari, S. Harish, G. Karthikeyan, M. Kannan and K. K. Kumar
Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology 34 (1) 16 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-024-00922-z

Opinion: Advancing science in support of sustainable bio-innovation: 16th ISBR Symposium – in memory of Professor Alan Raybould

Alan Gray, Monica Garcia-Alonso, Karen Hokanson, Andrew Roberts, Jörg Romeis and Joe Smith
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 13 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1593891

Using problem formulation for an efficient, fit-for-purpose risk assessment of microbial plant protection products

Anne K. Steenbergh, Gertie Arts, Peter A. H. M. Bakker, Wietse de Boer, Debora C. M. Glandorf, Mechteld M. S. ter Horst, Rob de Jonge, Willem Jan de Kogel and Jürgen Köhl
Environmental Sciences Europe 37 (1) (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-025-01062-4

A problem formulation framework for the application of in silico toxicology methods in chemical risk assessment

Jerry Achar, Mark T. D. Cronin, James W. Firman and Gunilla Öberg
Archives of Toxicology 98 (6) 1727 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-024-03721-6

Conceptual risk assessment of mosquito population modification gene-drive systems to control malaria transmission: preliminary hazards list workshops

Ana Kormos, George Dimopoulos, Ethan Bier, Gregory C. Lanzaro, John M. Marshall and Anthony A. James
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 11 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1261123

Assessing potential hybridization between a hypothetical gene drive‐modified Drosophila suzukii and nontarget Drosophila species

Sarah Wolf, Jana Collatz, Jürg Enkerli, Franco Widmer and Jörg Romeis
Risk Analysis 43 (10) 1921 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14096

GEnZ explorer: a tool for visualizing agroclimate to inform research and regulatory risk assessment

Rachel L. Melnick, Larissa Jarvis, Paul Hendley, Monica Garcia-Alonso, Marc J. Metzger, Navin Ramankutty, John L. Teem and Andrew Roberts
Transgenic Research 32 (4) 321 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-023-00354-w

RNAi for Western Corn Rootworm Management: Lessons Learned, Challenges, and Future Directions

Molly Darlington, Jordan D. Reinders, Amit Sethi, Albert L. Lu, Partha Ramaseshadri, Joshua R. Fischer, Chad J. Boeckman, Jay S. Petrick, Jason M. Roper, Kenneth E. Narva and Ana M. Vélez
Insects 13 (1) 57 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13010057

Potential use of gene drive modified insects against disease vectors, agricultural pests and invasive species poses new challenges for risk assessment

Yann Devos, John D. Mumford, Michael B. Bonsall, Ana M. Camargo, Leslie G. Firbank, Debora C. M. Glandorf, Fabien Nogué, Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos and Ernst A. Wimmer
Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 42 (2) 254 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2021.1933891

Risk management recommendations for environmental releases of gene drive modified insects

Yann Devos, John D. Mumford, Michael B. Bonsall, Debora C.M. Glandorf and Hector D. Quemada
Biotechnology Advances 54 107807 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107807

Systematic identification of plausible pathways to potential harm via problem formulation for investigational releases of a population suppression gene drive to control the human malaria vector Anopheles gambiae in West Africa

John B. Connolly, John D. Mumford, Silke Fuchs, Geoff Turner, Camilla Beech, Ace R. North and Austin Burt
Malaria Journal 20 (1) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03674-6

Environmental risk assessment of the DvSSJ1 dsRNA and the IPD072Aa protein to non-target organisms

Chad J. Boeckman, Jennifer A. Anderson, Christopher Linderblood, Taylor Olson, Jason Roper, Kristine Sturtz, Carl Walker and Rachel Woods
GM Crops & Food 12 (1) 459 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2021.1982348

Changes in Germination Rate and Growth of CMV-Resistant GM Pepper and Non-GM Peppers (Capsicum annuum L.) as Influenced by Overwintering Condition and Fruit Drying Method

Kuen Woo Park, Jun Hong Kim, Jun Pill Baek and Sang Yong Lee
Horticultural Science and Technology 38 (6) 785 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.7235/HORT.20200071

Assessing the Risks of Topically Applied dsRNA-Based Products to Non-target Arthropods

Jörg Romeis and Franco Widmer
Frontiers in Plant Science 11 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00679

The value of existing regulatory frameworks for the environmental risk assessment of agricultural pest control using gene drives

Jörg Romeis, Jana Collatz, Debora C.M. Glandorf and Michael B. Bonsall
Environmental Science & Policy 108 19 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.016

Problem Formulation for Off-Target Effects of Externally Applied Double-Stranded RNA-Based Products for Pest Control

Alan Raybould and Andrea Burns
Frontiers in Plant Science 11 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00424

Adequacy and sufficiency evaluation of existing EFSA guidelines for the molecular characterisation, environmental risk assessment and post‐market environmental monitoring of genetically modified insects containing engineered gene drives

Hanspeter Naegeli, Jean‐Louis Bresson, Tamas Dalmay, Ian C Dewhurst, Michelle M Epstein, Philippe Guerche, Jan Hejatko, Francisco J Moreno, Ewen Mullins, Fabien Nogué, Nils Rostoks, Jose J Sánchez Serrano, Giovanni Savoini, Eve Veromann, Fabio Veronesi, Michael B Bonsall, John Mumford, Ernst A Wimmer, Yann Devos, Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos and Leslie G Firbank
EFSA Journal 18 (11) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6297

Consistent Risk Assessment Outcomes from Agronomic Characterization of GE Maize in Diverse Regions and as Single‐Event and Stacked Products

Ernest L. Clawson, Jamis J. Perrett, Lulu Cheng, Aqeel Ahmad, Duška Stojšin, Yan McGowan, Oscar Heredia Díaz, Muhammad Asim, Hallison Vertuan, Murtaza Quddusi and Daniel J. Soares
Crop Science 59 (4) 1681 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2018.12.0758

Using problem formulation for fit‐for‐purpose pre‐market environmental risk assessments of regulated stressors

Yann Devos, Wendy Craig, Robert H Devlin, et al.
EFSA Journal 17 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170708

Risk Assessment and Regulation of Plants Modified by Modern Biotechniques: Current Status and Future Challenges

Joachim Schiemann, Antje Dietz-Pfeilstetter, Frank Hartung, Christian Kohl, Jörg Romeis and Thorben Sprink
Annual Review of Plant Biology 70 (1) 699 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100025

Teosinte and maize × teosinte hybrid plants in Europe−Environmental risk assessment and management implications for genetically modified maize

Yann Devos, Sol Ortiz-García, Karen E. Hokanson and Alan Raybould
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 259 19 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.02.032

Impact of transgenic soybean expressing Cry1Ac and Cry1F proteins on the non-target arthropod community associated with soybean in Brazil

Luiz H. Marques, Antonio C. Santos, Boris A. Castro, et al.
PLOS ONE 13 (2) e0191567 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191567

The Integration of Science and Policy in Regulatory Decision-Making: Observations on Scientific Expert Panels Deliberating GM Crops in Centers of Diversity

Karen E. Hokanson, Norman Ellstrand and Alan Raybould
Frontiers in Plant Science 9 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01157

Arthropods dataset from different genetically modified maize events and associated controls

Zoltán Pálinkás, Mihály Zalai, Ágnes Szénási, Zita Dorner, József Kiss, Samuel North, Guy Woodward and Adalbert Balog
Scientific Data 5 (1) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.19

Where do uncertainties reside within environmental risk assessments? Testing UnISERA, a guide for uncertainty assessment

Daniel J.C. Skinner, Sophie A. Rocks and Simon J.T. Pollard
Environmental Pollution 225 390 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.065

Results from the Workshop “Problem Formulation for the Use of Gene Drive in Mosquitoes”

Andrew Roberts, Paulo Paes de Andrade, Fredros Okumu, et al.
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 96 (3) 530 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.16-0726

Bacillus thuringiensis: a successful insecticide with new environmental features and tidings

Gholamreza Salehi Jouzani, Elena Valijanian and Reza Sharafi
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 101 (7) 2691 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8175-y

Effects of genetically modified maize events expressing Cry34Ab1, Cry35Ab1, Cry1F, and CP4 EPSPS proteins on arthropod complex food webs

Zoltán Pálinkás, József Kiss, Mihály Zalai, Ágnes Szénási, Zita Dorner, Samuel North, Guy Woodward and Adalbert Balog
Ecology and Evolution 7 (7) 2286 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2848

Integrated weed management systems with herbicide-tolerant crops in the European Union: lessons learnt from home and abroad

Jay Ram Lamichhane, Yann Devos, Hugh J. Beckie, et al.
Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 37 (4) 459 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2016.1180588

Relevance of a new scientific publication (Bøhn et al., 2016) for previous environmental risk assessment conclusions on the cultivation of Bt‐maize events MON810 and Bt11

EFSA Supporting Publications 13 (7) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2016.EN-1073

Assessment of unanticipated unintended effects of genetically modified plants on non‐target organisms: a controversy worthy of pursuit?

Y. Devos, F. Álvarez‐Alfageme, A. Gennaro and S. Mestdagh
Journal of Applied Entomology 140 (1-2) 1 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12248

Characterization of Natural and Simulated Herbivory on Wild Soybean (Glycine soja Seib. et Zucc.) for Use in Ecological Risk Assessment of Insect Protected Soybean

Hidetoshi Goto, Hiroshi Shimada, Michael J. Horak, et al.
PLOS ONE 11 (3) e0151237 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151237

Risk assessment of gene flow from genetically engineered virus resistant cassava to wild relatives in Africa: an expert panel report

Karen E. Hokanson, Norman C. Ellstrand, Alfred G. O. Dixon, et al.
Transgenic Research 25 (1) 71 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-015-9923-3

Advancing environmental risk assessment of regulated products under EFSA's remit

Yann Devos, Helmut Gaugitsch, Alan J. Gray, Lorraine Maltby, Jock Martin, Jeffery S. Pettis, Jörg Romeis, Agnès Rortais, Reinhilde Schoonjans, Joe Smith, Franz Streissl and Glenn W. Suter
EFSA Journal 14 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.s0508

Behavioral effects of insect-resistant genetically modified crops on phytophagous and beneficial arthropods: a review

Peng Han, María Concepción Velasco-Hernández, Ricardo Ramirez-Romero and Nicolas Desneux
Journal of Pest Science 89 (4) 859 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-016-0791-2

Evolution of risk assessment strategies for food and feed uses of stacked GM events

Catherine Kramer, Phil Brune, Justin McDonald, Monique Nesbitt, Alaina Sauve and Sabine Storck‐Weyhermueller
Plant Biotechnology Journal 14 (9) 1899 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12551

Biosafety research for non-target organism risk assessment of RNAi-based GE plants

Andrew F. Roberts, Yann Devos, Godwin N. Y. Lemgo and Xuguo Zhou
Frontiers in Plant Science 6 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00958

Environmental risk assessment of GE plants under low-exposure conditions

Andrew Roberts, Yann Devos, Alan Raybould, Patrick Bigelow and Alan Gray
Transgenic Research 23 (6) 971 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-013-9762-z

Towards a more open debate about values in decision-making on agricultural biotechnology

Yann Devos, Olivier Sanvido, Joyce Tait and Alan Raybould
Transgenic Research 23 (6) 933 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-013-9754-z

High concentrations of protein test substances may have non-toxic effects onDaphnia magna: Implications for regulatory study designs and ecological risk assessments for GM crops

Alan Raybould, Andrea Burns and Mick Hamer
GM Crops & Food 5 (4) 296 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.4161/21645698.2014.950540

Genetically Engineered Crops: From Idea to Product

Jose Rafael Prado, Gerrit Segers, Toni Voelker, Dave Carson, Raymond Dobert, Jonathan Phillips, Kevin Cook, Camilo Cornejo, Josh Monken, Laura Grapes, Tracey Reynolds and Susan Martino-Catt
Annual Review of Plant Biology 65 (1) 769 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040039

Short-term effects of different genetically modified maize varieties on arthropod food web properties: an experimental field assessment

Ágnes Szénási, Zoltán Pálinkás, Mihály Zalai, Oswald J. Schmitz and Adalbert Balog
Scientific Reports 4 (1) (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05315

Potential use of an arthropod database to support the non-target risk assessment and monitoring of transgenic plants

Jörg Romeis, Michael Meissle, Fernando Álvarez-Alfageme, et al.
Transgenic Research 23 (6) 995 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-014-9791-2

EFSA’s scientific activities and achievements on the risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) during its first decade of existence: looking back and ahead

Yann Devos, Jaime Aguilera, Zoltán Diveki, et al.
Transgenic Research 23 (1) 1 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-013-9741-4

Deriving criteria to select arthropod species for laboratory tests to assess the ecological risks from cultivating arthropod-resistant genetically engineered crops

Jörg Romeis, Alan Raybould, Franz Bigler, et al.
Chemosphere 90 (3) 901 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.035

Non-coding RNAs in Crop Genetic Modification: Considerations and Predictable Environmental Risk Assessments (ERA)

S. V. Ramesh
Molecular Biotechnology 55 (1) 87 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-013-9648-6

Initial risk assessment of genetically modified (GM) microalgae for commodity-scale biofuel cultivation

William J. Henley, R. Wayne Litaker, Lucie Novoveská, et al.
Algal Research 2 (1) 66 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2012.11.001

Characterization of the spectrum of insecticidal activity of a double-stranded RNA with targeted activity against Western Corn Rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte)

Pamela M. Bachman, Renata Bolognesi, William J. Moar, et al.
Transgenic Research 22 (6) 1207 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-013-9716-5

Biosafety Testing of Genetically Modified Ryegrass (Lolium perenne) Using a Model for the Optimum Selection of Test Invertebrates

B.I.P. Barratt, J. H. Todd, C. M. Ferguson, et al.
Environmental Entomology 42 (4) 820 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1603/EN13057

Ecological risk assessments for transgenic crops with combined insect‐resistance traits: the example of Bt11 × MIR604 maize

A. Raybould, G. Graser, K. Hill and K. Ward
Journal of Applied Entomology 136 (1-2) 27 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2010.01601.x

Genetically modified crops and aquatic ecosystems: considerations for environmental risk assessment and non-target organism testing

Keri Carstens, Jennifer Anderson, Pamela Bachman, et al.
Transgenic Research 21 (4) 813 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-011-9569-8

Evaluating environmental risks of genetically modified crops: ecological harm criteria for regulatory decision-making

Olivier Sanvido, Jörg Romeis, Achim Gathmann, et al.
Environmental Science & Policy 15 (1) 82 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.006

The Current State of the Environmental Impact Assessment of Abiotic Stress-Tolerant Genetically Modified Plants in the U.S., Canada, Australia, EU and Japan

Yasuyuki Yoshimura and Kazuhito Matsuo
Japanese Journal of Crop Science 81 (2) 137 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.81.137

Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants - concepts and controversies

Angelika Hilbeck, Matthias Meier, Jörg Römbke, et al.
Environmental Sciences Europe 23 (1) 13 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715-23-13

Regulatory considerations surrounding the deployment Of Bt-expressing cowpea in Africa

Joseph E. Huesing, Jörg Romeis, Norman C. Ellstrand, Alan Raybould, Richard L. Hellmich, Jeffrey D. Wolt, Jeffrey D. Ehlers, L. Clémentine Dabiré-Binso, Christian A. Fatokun, Karen E. Hokanson, Mohammad F. Ishiyaku, Venu M. Margam, Nompumelelo Obokoh, Jacob D. Mignouna, Francis Nang'ayo, Jeremy T. Ouedraogo, Rémy S. Pasquet, Barry R. Pittendrigh, Barbara A. Schaal, Jeff Stein, Manuele Tamò and Larry L. Murdock
GM Crops 2 (3) 211 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.4161/gmcr.2.3.18689

Systemic risks of genetically modified crops: the need for new approaches to risk assessment

Hartmut Meyer
Environmental Sciences Europe 23 (1) (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715-23-7

Derivation and Interpretation of Hazard Quotients To Assess Ecological Risks from the Cultivation of Insect-Resistant Transgenic Crops

Alan Raybould, Geoffrey Caron-Lormier and David A. Bohan
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 59 (11) 5877 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf1042079

Recommendations for the design of laboratory studies on non-target arthropods for risk assessment of genetically engineered plants

Jörg Romeis, Richard L. Hellmich, Marco P. Candolfi, et al.
Transgenic Research 20 (1) 1 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-010-9446-x

Environmental change challenges decision-making during post-market environmental monitoring of transgenic crops

Olivier Sanvido, Jörg Romeis and Franz Bigler
Transgenic Research 20 (6) 1191 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-011-9524-8

The bucket and the searchlight: formulating and testing risk hypotheses about the weediness and invasiveness potential of transgenic crops

Alan Raybould
Environmental Biosafety Research 9 (3) 123 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr/2011101

Bt maize expressing Cry3Bb1 does not harm the spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, or its ladybird beetle predator, Stethorus punctillum

Yunhe Li and Jörg Romeis
Biological Control 53 (3) 337 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.12.003

Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants

Jeffrey D. Wolt, Paul Keese, Alan Raybould, et al.
Transgenic Research 19 (3) 425 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-009-9321-9

Biofortified sorghum in Africa: using problem formulation to inform risk assessment

Karen E Hokanson, Norman C Ellstrand, Jeremy T Ouedraogo, et al.
Nature Biotechnology 28 (9) 900 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0910-900

Developing biosafety risk hypotheses for invertebrates exposed to GM plants using conceptual food webs: A case study with elevated triacylglyceride levels in ryegrass

Barbara I.P. Barratt, Jacqui H. Todd, Elisabeth P.J. Burgess and Louise A. Malone
Environmental Biosafety Research 9 (3) 163 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr/2011107

Contributions from scientific research to the risk assessment of GMOs. Lessons learned from a symposium held in Brussels, Belgium, 21–22 October 2010

Katia Pauwels, Didier Breyer, Adinda De Schrijver, Martine Goossens and Philippe Herman
Environmental Biosafety Research 9 (3) 113 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr/2011108

Using existing data to predict and quantify the risks of GM forage to a population of a non-target invertebrate species: A New Zealand case study

Maureen O’Callaghan, Tanya K. Soboleva and Barbara I.P. Barratt
Environmental Biosafety Research 9 (3) 155 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr/2011103

The CINMa Index: Assessing the potential impact of GM crop management across a heterogeneous landscape

Marcus J. Collier and Ewen Mullins
Environmental Biosafety Research 9 (3) 135 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr/2011102

Environmental risk assessments for transgenic crops producing output trait enzymes

Alan Raybould, Ann Tuttle, Scott Shore and Terry Stone
Transgenic Research 19 (4) 595 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-009-9343-3

Making effective use of existing data for case‐by‐case risk assessments of genetically engineered crops

J. Romeis, N. C. Lawo and A. Raybould
Journal of Applied Entomology 133 (8) 571 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2009.01423.x

Gene Flow, Invasiveness, and Ecological Impact of Genetically Modified Crops

Suzanne I. Warwick, Hugh J. Beckie and Linda M. Hall
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1168 (1) 72 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04576.x