A conceptual framework for the design of environmental post-market monitoring of genetically modified plants
Environ. Biosafety Res., 4 1 (2005) 13-27
Published online: 2005-08-15
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
951 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824315-2.00012-9
A Three-Year Plant Study of Salt-Tolerant Transgenic Maize Showed No Effects on Soil Enzyme Activity and Nematode Community
Xing Zeng, Tongtong Pei, Yongfeng Song, Pei Guo, Huilan Zhang, Xin Li, Hao Li, Hong Di and Zhenhua WangLife 12 (3) 412 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3390/life12030412
Use of Carabids for the Post-Market Environmental Monitoring of Genetically Modified Crops
Oxana Skoková Habuštová, Zdeňka Svobodová, Ľudovít Cagáň and František SehnalToxins 9 (4) 121 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins9040121
Advancing environmental risk assessment of regulated products under EFSA's remit
Yann Devos, Helmut Gaugitsch, Alan J. Gray, Lorraine Maltby, Jock Martin, Jeffery S. Pettis, Jörg Romeis, Agnès Rortais, Reinhilde Schoonjans, Joe Smith, Franz Streissl and Glenn W. SuterEFSA Journal 14 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.s0508
Communities of ground‐dwelling arthropods in conventional and transgenic maize: background data for the post‐market environmental monitoring
O. Skoková Habuštová, Z. Svobodová, L. Spitzer, P. Doležal, H. M. Hussein and F. SehnalJournal of Applied Entomology 139 (1-2) 31 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12160
The use of existing environmental networks for the post-market monitoring of GM crop cultivation in the EU
G. Smets, E. Alcalde, D. Andres, et al.Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 16 (7) 1754 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1039/c4em00093e
EFSA’s scientific activities and achievements on the risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) during its first decade of existence: looking back and ahead
Yann Devos, Jaime Aguilera, Zoltán Diveki, et al.Transgenic Research 23 (1) 1 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-013-9741-4
A 2-Year Field Study Shows Little Evidence That the Long-Term Planting of Transgenic Insect-Resistant Cotton Affects the Community Structure of Soil Nematodes
Xiaogang Li, Biao Liu and Nicolas DesneuxPLoS ONE 8 (4) e61670 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061670
Scientific Opinion on an application from Pioneer Hi‐Bred International and Dow AgroSciences LLC (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2005‐23) for placing on the market of genetically modified maize 59122 for food and feed uses, import, processing and cultivation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003
EFSA Journal 11 (3) (2013)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3135
1666 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5797-8_167
Evaluating environmental risks of genetically modified crops: ecological harm criteria for regulatory decision-making
Olivier Sanvido, Jörg Romeis, Achim Gathmann, et al.Environmental Science & Policy 15 (1) 82 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.006
10765 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3_167
Field trials to evaluate effects of continuously planted transgenic insect-resistant cottons on soil invertebrates
Xiaogang Li, Biao Liu, Xingxiang Wang, et al.Journal of Environmental Monitoring 14 (3) 1055 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1039/c2em10378h
General Surveillance of the soil ecosystem: An approach to monitoring unexpected adverse effects of GMO's
Eric Smit, Peter A.H.M. Bakker, Hans Bergmans, et al.Ecological Indicators 14 (1) 107 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.08.017
Scientific Opinion on an application (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2005‐24) for the placing on the market of the herbicide tolerant genetically modified soybean 40‐3‐2 for cultivation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto
EFSA Journal 10 (6) 2753 (2012)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2753
1 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118373781.ch1
Overview of principles and implementations to deal with spatial issues in monitoring environmental effects of genetically modified organisms
Winfried Schröder and Gunther SchmidtEnvironmental Sciences Europe 24 (1) 6 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715-24-6
Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA-GMO-UK-2008-60) for placing on the market of genetically modified herbicide tolerant maize GA21 for food and feed uses, import, processing and cultivation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Syngenta Seeds
EFSA Journal 9 (12) 2480 (2011)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2480
No evidence of persistent effects of continuously planted transgenic insect-resistant cotton on soil microorganisms
Xiaogang Li, Biao Liu, Jinjie Cui, et al.Plant and Soil 339 (1-2) 247 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0572-2
Guidance on the Post-Market Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) of genetically modified plants
EFSA Journal 9 (8) 2316 (2011)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2316
Statement supplementing the evaluation of the environmental risk assessment and risk management recommendations on insect resistant genetically modified maize Bt11 for cultivation
EFSA Journal 9 (12) 2478 (2011)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2478
Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA‐GMO‐CZ‐2008‐54) for placing on the market of genetically modified insect resistant and herbicide tolerant maize MON 88017 for cultivation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto
EFSA Journal 9 (11) (2011)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2428
Environmental change challenges decision-making during post-market environmental monitoring of transgenic crops
Olivier Sanvido, Jörg Romeis and Franz BiglerTransgenic Research 20 (6) 1191 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-011-9524-8
Risk Assessment and Ecological Effects of Transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis Crops on Non‐Target OrganismsF
Hui‐Lin Yu, Yun‐He Li and Kong‐Ming WuJournal of Integrative Plant Biology 53 (7) 520 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2011.01047.x
Genetic Modification of Plants
Yann Devos, Karine Lheureux and Joachim SchiemannBiotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Genetic Modification of Plants 64 553 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02391-0_26
A Framework for Postrelease Environmental Monitoring of Second‐generation Crops with Novel Traits
Hugh J. Beckie, Linda M. Hall, Marie‐Josée Simard, Julia Y. Leeson and Christian J. WillenborgCrop Science 50 (5) 1587 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2009.12.0743
Genetic Modification of Plants
Detlef Bartsch, Yann Devos, Rosie Hails, et al.Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Genetic Modification of Plants 64 575 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02391-0_27
A Precautionary Approach to Genetically Modified Organisms: Challenges and Implications for Policy and Science
Anne Ingeborg MyhrJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (6) 501 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-010-9234-x
Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants
EFSA Journal 8 (11) 1879 (2010)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1879
The CINMa Index: Assessing the potential impact of GM crop management across a heterogeneous landscape
Marcus J. Collier and Ewen MullinsEnvironmental Biosafety Research 9 (3) 135 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr/2011102
Diabrotica-resistantBt-maize DKc5143 event MON88017 has no impact on the field densities of the leafhopperZyginidia scutellaris
Stefan Rauschen, Eva Schultheis, Heinz Hunfeld, et al.Environmental Biosafety Research 9 (2) 87 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr/2010012
Quantifying the introgressive hybridisation propensity between transgenic oilseed rape and its wild/weedy relatives
Yann Devos, Adinda De Schrijver and Dirk ReheulEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment 149 (1-4) 303 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0204-y
Monitoring the commercial cultivation ofBtmaize in Europe – conclusions and recommendations for future monitoring practice
Ralf Wilhelm, Olivier Sanvido, Pedro Castanera, Kerstin Schmidt and Joachim SchiemannEnvironmental Biosafety Research 8 (4) 219 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr/2009018
Case-specific monitoring of butterflies to determine potential effects of transgenic Bt-maize in Switzerland
S. Aviron, O. Sanvido, J. Romeis, F. Herzog and F. BiglerAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 131 (3-4) 137 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.01.007
Scientific report of EFSA prepared by the GMO Unit on Public Consultation on the Updated Guidance Document of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed
EFSA Journal 7 (5) 293r (2009)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2009.293r
An approach for post‐market monitoring of potential environmental effects of Bt‐maize expressing Cry1Ab on natural enemies
O. Sanvido, J. Romeis and F. BiglerJournal of Applied Entomology 133 (4) 236 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2008.01367.x
Farm questionnaires for monitoring genetically modified crops: a case study using GM maize
Kerstin Schmidt, Ralf Wilhelm, Jörg Schmidtke, et al.Environmental Biosafety Research 7 (3) 163 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2008015
Integration of Insect-Resistant Genetically Modified Crops within IPM Programs
Sharlene R. Matten, Graham P. Head and Hector D. QuemadaIntegration of Insect-Resistant Genetically Modified Crops within IPM Programs 27 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8373-0_2
Determining indicators, methods and sites for monitoring potential adverse effects of genetically modified plants to the environment: the legal and conceptional framework for implementation
Wiebke Züghart, Armin Benzler, Frank Berhorn, Ulrich Sukopp and Frieder GraefEuphytica 164 (3) 845 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9475-6
The interplay between societal concerns and the regulatory frame on GM crops in the European Union
Yann Devos, Dirk Reheul, Danny De Waele and Linda Van SpeybroeckEnvironmental Biosafety Research 5 (3) 127 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2007002
Clarifications of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms following a request from the Commission related to the opinions on insect resistant genetically modified Bt111 (Reference C/F/96/05.10) and 15072 (Reference C/ES/01/01) maize
EFSA Journal 4 (11) (2006)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2006.1561
Guidance document for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed by the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) ‐ including draft document updated in 2008
EFSA Journal 4 (4) (2006)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2006.99
Opinion of the Scientific Panel on genetically modified organisms [GMO] on the Post Market Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) of genetically modified plants
EFSA Journal 4 (3) 319 (2006)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2006.319