Selection of relevant non-target herbivores for monitoring the environmental effects of Bt maize pollen
Environ. Biosafety Res., 2 2 (2003) 117-132
Published online: 2003-06-15
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Extension of the spatially‐ and temporally‐explicit “briskaR‐NTL” model to assess potential adverse effects of Bt‐maize pollen on non‐target Lepidoptera at landscape level
Virgile Baudrot, Andreas Lang, Constanti Stefanescu, Samuel Soubeyrand and Antoine MesséanEFSA Supporting Publications 18 (4) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2021.EN-6443
Selection of non-target Lepidoptera species to test Bt maize effects in the laboratory: which species and how to breed them?
Andreas Lang, Matthias Dolek, Marina S. Lee, Anja Freese-Hager and Mathias OttoBioRisk 15 45 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3897/biorisk.15.59823
Estimating acute mortality of Lepidoptera caused by the cultivation of insect-resistant Bt maize – The LepiX model
Lorenz Fahse, Phillip Papastefanou and Mathias OttoEcological Modelling 371 50 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.01.006
Are Limits of Concern a useful concept to improve the environmental risk assessment of GM plants?
Marion Dolezel, Marianne Miklau, Andreas Heissenberger and Wolfram ReichenbecherEnvironmental Sciences Europe 29 (1) (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-017-0104-2
Updating risk management recommendations to limit exposure of non‐target Lepidoptera of conservation concern in protected habitats to Bt‐maize pollen
EFSA Journal 13 (7) (2015)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4127
Potential use of an arthropod database to support the non-target risk assessment and monitoring of transgenic plants
Jörg Romeis, Michael Meissle, Fernando Álvarez-Alfageme, et al.Transgenic Research 23 (6) 995 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-014-9791-2
Increased mortality is predicted of Inachis io larvae caused by Bt-maize pollen in European farmland
Niels Holst, Andreas Lang, Gabor Lövei and Mathias OttoEcological Modelling 250 126 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.11.006
Environmental risk assessment for the small tortoiseshell Aglais urticae and a stacked Bt‐maize with combined resistances against Lepidoptera and Chrysomelidae in central European agrarian landscapes
MECHTHILD SCHUPPENER, JULIA MÜHLHAUSE, ANNE‐KATRIN MÜLLER and STEFAN RAUSCHENMolecular Ecology 21 (18) 4646 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05716.x
Scientific Opinion supplementing the conclusions of the environmental risk assessment and risk management recommendations for the cultivation of the genetically modified insect resistant maize Bt11 and MON 810
EFSA Journal 10 (12) (2012)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.3016
Estimating the effects of Cry1F Bt‐maize pollen on non‐target Lepidoptera using a mathematical model of exposure
Joe N. Perry, Yann Devos, Salvatore Arpaia, Detlef Bartsch, Christina Ehlert, Achim Gathmann, Rosemary S. Hails, Niels B. Hendriksen, Jozsef Kiss, Antoine Messéan, Sylvie Mestdagh, Gerd Neemann, Marco Nuti, Jeremy B. Sweet and Christoph C. TebbeJournal of Applied Ecology 49 (1) 29 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02083.x
Scientific Opinion supplementing the conclusions of the environmental risk assessment and risk management recommendations on the genetically modified insect resistant maize 1507 for cultivation
EFSA Journal 10 (11) 2934 (2012)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2934
Establishing a database of bio‐ecological information on non‐target arthropod species to support the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops in the EU
Michael Meissle, Fernando Álvarez‐Alfageme, Louise A. Malone and Jörg RomeisEFSA Supporting Publications 9 (9) (2012)
https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2012.EN-334
Scientific Opinion updating the evaluation of the environmental risk assessment and risk management recommendations on insect resistant genetically modified maize 1507 for cultivation
EFSA Journal 9 (11) (2011)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2429
Bt maize and integrated pest management ‐ a European perspective
Michael Meissle, Jörg Romeis and Franz BiglerPest Management Science 67 (9) 1049 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2221
A mathematical model of exposure of non-target Lepidoptera to Bt -maize pollen expressing Cry1Ab within Europe
J. N. Perry, Y. Devos, S. Arpaia, et al.Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277 (1686) 1417 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.2091
Genetic Modification of Plants
Detlef Bartsch, Yann Devos, Rosie Hails, et al.Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Genetic Modification of Plants 64 575 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02391-0_27
A synthesis of laboratory and field studies on the effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) maize on non‐target Lepidoptera
A. Lang and M. OttoEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 135 (2) 121 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2010.00981.x
Case-specific monitoring of butterflies to determine potential effects of transgenic Bt-maize in Switzerland
S. Aviron, O. Sanvido, J. Romeis, F. Herzog and F. BiglerAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 131 (3-4) 137 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.01.007
Applications (EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐MON810) for renewal of authorisation for the continued marketing of (1) existing food and food ingredients produced from genetically modified insect resistant maize MON810; (2) feed consisting of and/or containing maize MON810, including the use of seed for cultivation; and of (3) food and feed additives, and feed materials produced from maize MON810, all under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto
EFSA Journal 7 (6) 1149 (2009)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1149
Request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by Austria on maize MON810 and T25 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC
EFSA Journal 6 (12) 891 (2008)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2008.891
Integration of Insect-Resistant Genetically Modified Crops within IPM Programs
Nicholas P. Storer, Galen P. Dively and Rod A. HermanIntegration of Insect-Resistant Genetically Modified Crops within IPM Programs 273 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8373-0_10
Request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by France on maize MON810 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC and the emergency measure according to Article 34 of Regulation(EC) No 1829/2003 ‐ Scientific opinion of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms
EFSA Journal 6 (10) (2008)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2008.850
A screening method for prioritizing non-target invertebrates for improved biosafety testing of transgenic crops
Jacqui H. Todd, Padmaja Ramankutty, Emma I. Barraclough and Louise A. MaloneEnvironmental Biosafety Research 7 (1) 35 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2008003
Opinion of the Scientific Panel on genetically modified organisms [GMO] related to the safeguard clause invoked by Greece according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC and to Article 18 of Directive 2002/53/EC
EFSA Journal 4 (11) 411 (2006)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2006.411
Impact of Bt maize pollen (MON810) on lepidopteran larvae living on accompanying weeds
ACHIM GATHMANN, LUDGER WIROOKS, LUDWIG A. HOTHORN, DETLEF BARTSCH and INGOLF SCHUPHANMolecular Ecology 15 (9) 2677 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02962.x
Spatial distribution ofAglais urticae(L.) and its host plantUrtica dioica(L.) in an agricultural landscape: implications forBtmaize risk assessment and post-market monitoring
Achim Gathmann, Ludger Wirooks, Jörg Eckert and Ingolf SchuphanEnvironmental Biosafety Research 5 (1) 27 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2006014
Biosafety assessment protocols for new organisms in New Zealand: Can they apply internationally to emerging technologies?
B.I.P. Barratt, A. Moeed and L.A. MaloneEnvironmental Impact Assessment Review 26 (4) 339 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2005.11.008
Impact of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis cotton on a non‐target pest Tetranychus spp. in northern China
XIAO‐MU MA, XIAO‐XIA LIU, QING‐WEN ZHANG, JI‐JUN LI and AI‐MIN RENInsect Science 13 (4) 279 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2006.00095.x
Clarifications of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms following a request from the Commission related to the opinions on insect resistant genetically modified Bt111 (Reference C/F/96/05.10) and 15072 (Reference C/ES/01/01) maize
EFSA Journal 4 (11) (2006)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2006.1561
Will transgenic plants adversely affect the environment?
Vassili V. Velkov, Alexander B. Medvinsky, Mikhail S. Sokolov and Anatoly I. MarchenkoJournal of Biosciences 30 (4) 515 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02703726
Opinion of the Scientific Panel on genetically modified organisms [GMO] related to the notification (Reference C/ES/01/01) for the placing on the market of insect-tolerant genetically modified maize 1507 for import, feed and industrial processing and cult
EFSA Journal 3 (3) 181 (2005)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2005.181
Opinion of the Scientific Panel on genetically modified organisms [GMO] related to the safeguard clause invoked by Hungary according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC
EFSA Journal 3 (7) 228 (2005)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2005.228
Improving the Safety of Fresh Fruit and Vegetables
I. VänninenImproving the Safety of Fresh Fruit and Vegetables 293 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845690243.2.293
Effects of transgenic Bt corn pollen on a non-target lycaenid butterfly, Pseudozizeeria maha
Yoichi Shirai and Mami TakahashiApplied Entomology and Zoology 40 (1) 151 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.2005.151
Opinion of the Scientific Panel on genetically modified organisms [GMO] related to the notification for the placing on the market of insect resistant genetically modified maize Bt11, for cultivation, feed and industrial processing
EFSA Journal 3 (5) 213 (2005)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2005.213
EFFECTS OF PLANTS GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOR INSECT RESISTANCE ON NONTARGET ORGANISMS
Maureen O'Callaghan, Travis R. Glare, Elisabeth P.J. Burgess and Louise A. MaloneAnnual Review of Entomology 50 (1) 271 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.50.071803.130352
Methodological scheme for designing the monitoring of genetically modified crops at the regional scale
F. Graef, W. Züghart, B. Hommel, et al.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 111 (1-3) 1 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-8044-5
Monitoring the impact ofBtmaize on butterflies in the field: estimation of required sample sizes
Andreas LangEnvironmental Biosafety Research 3 (1) 55 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2003018
Regulatory and associated political issues with respect to Bt transgenic maize in the European union
Christiane Saeglitz and Detlef BartschJournal of Invertebrate Pathology 83 (2) 107 (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2011(03)00062-4