Detecting (trans)gene flow to landraces in centers of crop origin: lessons from the case of maize in Mexico
Environ. Biosafety Res., 4 4 (2005) 197-208
Published online: 2006-06-22
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
The evolution of agroecology in Mexico, 1920–2023
Víctor M. Toledo and Quetzal ArguetaElem Sci Anth 12 (1) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2023.00092
Global modeling of the socioeconomic, political, and environmental relations of farmer seed systems (FSS): Spatial analysis and insights for sustainable development
Karl S. Zimmerer, Steven J. Vanek, Megan Dwyer Baumann and Jacob van EttenElem Sci Anth 11 (1) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2022.00069
The Household Context of In Situ Conservation in a Center of Crop Diversity: Self-Reported Practices and Perceptions of Maize and Phaseolus Bean Farmers in Oaxaca, Mexico
Daniela Soleri, Flavio Aragón Cuevas, Humberto Castro García, David A. Cleveland and Steven E. SmithSustainability 14 (12) 7148 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127148
Temporal dynamics of detected transgenes in maize landraces in their center of origin
Beatriz Rendón-Aguilar, Luis Alberto Bernal-Ramírez, David Bravo-Avilez and Martha Graciela Rocha-MuniveRevista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 90 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2019.90.2653
Challenges for transgene detection in landraces and wild relatives: learning from 15 years of debate over GM maize in Mexico
Sarah Z. Agapito-Tenfen and Fern WicksonBiodiversity and Conservation 27 (3) 539 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1471-0
Transgene flow in Mexican maize revisited: Socio‐biological analysis across two contrasting farmer communities and seed management systems
Sarah Agapito‐Tenfen, Flor R. Lopez, Narmeen Mallah, Gretta Abou‐Slemayne, Miluse Trtikova, Rubens O. Nodari and Fern WicksonEcology and Evolution 7 (22) 9461 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3415
Political Agroecology in Mexico: A Path toward Sustainability
Víctor Toledo and Narciso Barrera-BassolsSustainability 9 (2) 268 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020268
Do We Care About Synbiodiversity? Questions Arising from an Investigation into Whether There are GM Crops in the Svalbard Global Seed Vault
Fern WicksonJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (5) 787 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-016-9634-7
Evidence of gene flow between transgenic and non-transgenic maize in Colombia
Alejandro Chaparro-Giraldo, Jennifer Teresa Blanco M. and Silvio Alejandro López-PazosAgronomía Colombiana 33 (3) 297 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v33n3.51501
108 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118854396.ch7
103 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20532-8_7
Encyclopedia of Natural Resources: Land
Daniela Soleri and David A. ClevelandEncyclopedia of Natural Resources: Land 256 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1081/E-ENRL-120049217
Genetic fallout in bio-cultural landscapes: Molecular imperialism and the cultural politics of (not) seeing transgenes in Mexico
Christophe Bonneuil, Jean Foyer and Brian WynneSocial Studies of Science 44 (6) 901 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312714548258
Sample size for detecting transgenic plants using inverse binomial group testing with dilution effect
Osval Antonio Montesinos-López, Abelardo Montesinos-López, José Crossa and Kent EskridgeSeed Science Research 23 (4) 279 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960258513000238
Genetically-engineered crops and their effects on varietal diversity: a case of Bt eggplant in India
Deepthi Elizabeth Kolady and William LesserAgriculture and Human Values 29 (1) 3 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-011-9320-3
Relativism, regulation and the dangers of indifferent science
Colin L. BerryToxicology 267 (1-3) 7 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2009.11.005
Maize and Biosecurity in Mexico: Debate and Practice ‐ by Antal, E., Baker, L. and Verschoor, G.
Mauricio R. BellonBulletin of Latin American Research 29 (3) 388 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-9856.2010.00391.x
Sample size for detecting and estimating the proportion of transgenic plants with narrow confidence intervals
Osval Antonio Montesinos López, Abelardo Montesinos López, José Crossa, Kent Eskridge and Carlos Moises Hernández SuárezSeed Science Research 20 (2) 123 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S096025851000005X
223 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.foyer.2010.01.0223
Unwanted Transgenes Re‐Discovered in Oaxacan Maize
ALLISON SNOWMolecular Ecology 18 (4) 569 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.04063.x
The dilemma of decontamination: A Gramscian analysis of the Mexican transgenic maize dispute
Joel Wainwright and Kristin MercerGeoforum 40 (3) 345 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.09.013
Dispersal of Transgenes through Maize Seed Systems in Mexico
George A. Dyer, J. Antonio Serratos-Hernández, Hugo R. Perales, et al.PLoS ONE 4 (5) e5734 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005734
Advances in Maize Genomics and Their Value for Enhancing Genetic Gains from Breeding
Yunbi Xu, Debra J. Skinner, Huixia Wu, Natalia Palacios-Rojas, Jose Luis Araus, Jianbing Yan, Shibin Gao, Marilyn L. Warburton, Jonathan H. Crouch and Sylvie CloutierInternational Journal of Plant Genomics 2009 (1) (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/957602
Introgression from modern hybrid varieties into landrace populations of maize (Zea mays ssp. mays L.) in central Italy
E. BITOCCHI, L. NANNI, M. ROSSI, D. RAU, E. BELLUCCI, A. GIARDINI, A. BUONAMICI, G. G. VENDRAMIN and R. PAPAMolecular Ecology 18 (4) 603 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.04064.x
Transgenes in Mexican maize: molecular evidence and methodological considerations for GMO detection in landrace populations
A. PIÑEYRO‐NELSON, J. VAN HEERWAARDEN, H. R. PERALES, J. A. SERRATOS‐HERNÁNDEZ, A. RANGEL, M. B. HUFFORD, P. GEPTS, A. GARAY‐ARROYO, R. RIVERA‐BUSTAMANTE and E. R. ÁLVAREZ‐BUYLLAMolecular Ecology 18 (4) 750 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03993.x
Beyond techno-science: Transgenic maize in the fight over Mexico’s future
Kathleen McAfeeGeoforum 39 (1) 148 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.06.002
Research and field monitoring on transgenic crops by the Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo (CIMMYT)
David Hoisington and Rodomiro OrtizEuphytica 164 (3) 893 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9633-x
Modified genes spread to local maize
Rex DaltonNature 456 (7219) 149 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1038/456149a
Probability models for detecting transgenic plants
Carlos M. Hernández-Suárez, Osval A. Montesinos-López, Graham McLaren and José CrossaSeed Science Research 18 (2) 77 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960258508975565
Food Globalization and Local Diversity
Daniela Soleri, David A. Cleveland and Flavio Aragón CuevasCurrent Anthropology 49 (2) 281 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1086/527562
GM soybeans—revisiting a controversial format
Brian JohnNature Biotechnology 25 (12) 1354 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1207-1354
Transgenic Maize in Mexico
SOL ORTIZ-GARCÍA, EXEQUIEL EZCURRA, BERND SCHOEL, et al.BioScience 56 (9) 709 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[709:TMIM]2.0.CO;2
Response from Soleri and colleagues
DANIELA SOLERI, DAVID A. CLEVELAND and FLAVIO ARAGÓN CUEVASBioScience 56 (9) 709 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[709:RFSAC]2.0.CO;2
Things to look forward to in EBR
Mark TEPFEREnvironmental Biosafety Research 4 (4) 195 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2006009
Reply to Cleveland et al.’s “Detecting (trans)gene flow to landraces in centers of crop origin: lessons from the case of maize in Mexico”
Sol Ortiz-García, Exequiel Ezcurra, Bernd Schoel, et al.Environmental Biosafety Research 4 (4) 209 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2006007