Problem formulation and hypothesis testing for environmental risk assessments of genetically modified crops
Environ. Biosafety Res., 5 3 (2006) 119-125
Published online: 2007-03-17
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Fit‐for‐purpose risk assessment for low‐concern active substances and uses
Vryzas Zisis, H.P. Arts Gertie, Dalakouras Athanasios, Fragkoulis Georgios, Guijarro Belén, Karazafeiris Emmanouil, Karpouzas Dimitrios, Menkissoglu‐Spiroudi Urania, Papadakis Emmanouil Nikolaos, K. Papadopoulou Kalliope, Patino‐Ropero María José, Polst Bastian, Alonso‐Prados José Luis, Steenbergh Anne, Tsaloumi Sofia and Tsampoula AggelikiEFSA Supporting Publications 23 (1) (2026)
https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2026.EN-9791
Characterization of the spectrum of insecticidal activity of Cry1B.3, Cry1Da_7, and Vip3Cb1 proteins produced by lepidopteran-protected MON 89151 cotton
Carlos J. Esquivel, Frankie Stubbins, Harit K. Bal, Jianguo Tan, Brent Werner, Steven Michael Reyna, Jennifer Fridley, Geoffrey Mueller, Yu Liu-Gontarek, Bingyao Li, Chen Meng, Christopher R. Brown, Tianbo Xu, Steven L. Levine, Yong Yin and Chitvan KhajuriaScientific Reports 15 (1) (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-23841-y
Opinion: Advancing science in support of sustainable bio-innovation: 16th ISBR Symposium – in memory of Professor Alan Raybould
Alan Gray, Monica Garcia-Alonso, Karen Hokanson, Andrew Roberts, Jörg Romeis and Joe SmithFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 13 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1593891
Advancements in dsRNA-based approaches: a comprehensive review on potent strategies for plant disease management
D. S. Srimahesvari, S. Harish, G. Karthikeyan, M. Kannan and K. K. KumarJournal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology 34 (1) 16 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-024-00922-z
Problem formulation for a small-scale field study of non-gene drive, genetically modified, male bias mosquitoes in Burkina Faso
Keith R. Hayes and Geoffrey R. HosackHuman and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 31 (5-6) 833 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2025.2484229
Using problem formulation for an efficient, fit-for-purpose risk assessment of microbial plant protection products
Anne K. Steenbergh, Gertie Arts, Peter A. H. M. Bakker, Wietse de Boer, Debora C. M. Glandorf, Mechteld M. S. ter Horst, Rob de Jonge, Willem Jan de Kogel and Jürgen KöhlEnvironmental Sciences Europe 37 (1) (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-025-01062-4
Environmental risk assessment of the Cry1B.34.1, Cry1B.61.1, and IPD083Cb proteins to non-target organisms
Joseph E. Iboyi, Chad J. Boeckman, Kristine LeRoy, Stephen L. Ballou, Reba J. Bruyere, Verissimo G. de Sá, Timothy Gunderson, Emily Huang, Christopher Linderblood, Taylor Olson, Bridget F. O’Neill, Josh J. Parsons, Mathew Sandmann, Brian Stolte and Yiwei WangGM Crops & Food 16 (1) 733 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2025.2572186
A problem formulation framework for the application of in silico toxicology methods in chemical risk assessment
Jerry Achar, Mark T. D. Cronin, James W. Firman and Gunilla ÖbergArchives of Toxicology 98 (6) 1727 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-024-03721-6
951 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824315-2.00012-9
Conceptual risk assessment of mosquito population modification gene-drive systems to control malaria transmission: preliminary hazards list workshops
Ana Kormos, George Dimopoulos, Ethan Bier, Gregory C. Lanzaro, John M. Marshall and Anthony A. JamesFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 11 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1261123
GEnZ explorer: a tool for visualizing agroclimate to inform research and regulatory risk assessment
Rachel L. Melnick, Larissa Jarvis, Paul Hendley, Monica Garcia-Alonso, Marc J. Metzger, Navin Ramankutty, John L. Teem and Andrew RobertsTransgenic Research 32 (4) 321 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-023-00354-w
Assessing potential hybridization between a hypothetical gene drive‐modified Drosophila suzukii and nontarget Drosophila species
Sarah Wolf, Jana Collatz, Jürg Enkerli, Franco Widmer and Jörg RomeisRisk Analysis 43 (10) 1921 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14096
Risk management recommendations for environmental releases of gene drive modified insects
Yann Devos, John D. Mumford, Michael B. Bonsall, Debora C.M. Glandorf and Hector D. QuemadaBiotechnology Advances 54 107807 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107807
Potential use of gene drive modified insects against disease vectors, agricultural pests and invasive species poses new challenges for risk assessment
Yann Devos, John D. Mumford, Michael B. Bonsall, Ana M. Camargo, Leslie G. Firbank, Debora C. M. Glandorf, Fabien Nogué, Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos and Ernst A. WimmerCritical Reviews in Biotechnology 42 (2) 254 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2021.1933891
RNAi for Western Corn Rootworm Management: Lessons Learned, Challenges, and Future Directions
Molly Darlington, Jordan D. Reinders, Amit Sethi, Albert L. Lu, Partha Ramaseshadri, Joshua R. Fischer, Chad J. Boeckman, Jay S. Petrick, Jason M. Roper, Kenneth E. Narva and Ana M. VélezInsects 13 (1) 57 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13010057
Environmental risk assessment of the DvSSJ1 dsRNA and the IPD072Aa protein to non-target organisms
Chad J. Boeckman, Jennifer A. Anderson, Christopher Linderblood, Taylor Olson, Jason Roper, Kristine Sturtz, Carl Walker and Rachel WoodsGM Crops & Food 12 (1) 459 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2021.1982348
Systematic identification of plausible pathways to potential harm via problem formulation for investigational releases of a population suppression gene drive to control the human malaria vector Anopheles gambiae in West Africa
John B. Connolly, John D. Mumford, Silke Fuchs, Geoff Turner, Camilla Beech, Ace R. North and Austin BurtMalaria Journal 20 (1) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03674-6
Problem Formulation for Off-Target Effects of Externally Applied Double-Stranded RNA-Based Products for Pest Control
Alan Raybould and Andrea BurnsFrontiers in Plant Science 11 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00424
19 305 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53183-6_14
Adequacy and sufficiency evaluation of existing EFSA guidelines for the molecular characterisation, environmental risk assessment and post‐market environmental monitoring of genetically modified insects containing engineered gene drives
Hanspeter Naegeli, Jean‐Louis Bresson, Tamas Dalmay, Ian C Dewhurst, Michelle M Epstein, Philippe Guerche, Jan Hejatko, Francisco J Moreno, Ewen Mullins, Fabien Nogué, Nils Rostoks, Jose J Sánchez Serrano, Giovanni Savoini, Eve Veromann, Fabio Veronesi, Michael B Bonsall, John Mumford, Ernst A Wimmer, Yann Devos, Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos and Leslie G FirbankEFSA Journal 18 (11) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6297
Changes in Germination Rate and Growth of CMV-Resistant GM Pepper and Non-GM Peppers (Capsicum annuum L.) as Influenced by Overwintering Condition and Fruit Drying Method
Kuen Woo Park, Jun Hong Kim, Jun Pill Baek and Sang Yong LeeHorticultural Science and Technology 38 (6) 785 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.7235/HORT.20200071
Genetic Biocontrol for Invasive Species
John L. Teem, Luke Alphey, Sarah Descamps, et al.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 8 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00452
Assessing the Risks of Topically Applied dsRNA-Based Products to Non-target Arthropods
Jörg Romeis and Franco WidmerFrontiers in Plant Science 11 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00679
The value of existing regulatory frameworks for the environmental risk assessment of agricultural pest control using gene drives
Jörg Romeis, Jana Collatz, Debora C.M. Glandorf and Michael B. BonsallEnvironmental Science & Policy 108 19 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.016
Using problem formulation for fit‐for‐purpose pre‐market environmental risk assessments of regulated stressors
Yann Devos, Wendy Craig, Robert H Devlin, et al.EFSA Journal 17 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170708
Risk Assessment and Regulation of Plants Modified by Modern Biotechniques: Current Status and Future Challenges
Joachim Schiemann, Antje Dietz-Pfeilstetter, Frank Hartung, Christian Kohl, Jörg Romeis and Thorben SprinkAnnual Review of Plant Biology 70 (1) 699 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100025
Conducting fit‐for‐purpose food safety risk assessments
Yann Devos, Kevin C Elliott, Philip Macdonald, et al.EFSA Journal 17 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170707
Current risk assessment approaches for environmental and food and feed safety assessment
Jeffrey D. WoltTransgenic Research 28 (S2) 111 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-019-00140-7
Consistent Risk Assessment Outcomes from Agronomic Characterization of GE Maize in Diverse Regions and as Single‐Event and Stacked Products
Ernest L. Clawson, Jamis J. Perrett, Lulu Cheng, Aqeel Ahmad, Duška Stojšin, Yan McGowan, Oscar Heredia Díaz, Muhammad Asim, Hallison Vertuan, Murtaza Quddusi and Daniel J. SoaresCrop Science 59 (4) 1681 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2018.12.0758
Problem formulation and phenotypic characterisation for the development of novel crops
Alan RaybouldTransgenic Research 28 (S2) 135 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-019-00147-0
Arthropods dataset from different genetically modified maize events and associated controls
Zoltán Pálinkás, Mihály Zalai, Ágnes Szénási, Zita Dorner, József Kiss, Samuel North, Guy Woodward and Adalbert BalogScientific Data 5 (1) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.19
Teosinte and maize × teosinte hybrid plants in Europe−Environmental risk assessment and management implications for genetically modified maize
Yann Devos, Sol Ortiz-García, Karen E. Hokanson and Alan RaybouldAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 259 19 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.02.032
The Integration of Science and Policy in Regulatory Decision-Making: Observations on Scientific Expert Panels Deliberating GM Crops in Centers of Diversity
Karen E. Hokanson, Norman Ellstrand and Alan RaybouldFrontiers in Plant Science 9 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01157
Impact of transgenic soybean expressing Cry1Ac and Cry1F proteins on the non-target arthropod community associated with soybean in Brazil
Luiz H. Marques, Antonio C. Santos, Boris A. Castro, et al.PLOS ONE 13 (2) e0191567 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191567
Results from the Workshop “Problem Formulation for the Use of Gene Drive in Mosquitoes”
Andrew Roberts, Paulo Paes de Andrade, Fredros Okumu, et al.The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 96 (3) 530 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.16-0726
Integrated weed management systems with herbicide-tolerant crops in the European Union: lessons learnt from home and abroad
Jay Ram Lamichhane, Yann Devos, Hugh J. Beckie, et al.Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 37 (4) 459 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2016.1180588
Where do uncertainties reside within environmental risk assessments? Testing UnISERA, a guide for uncertainty assessment
Daniel J.C. Skinner, Sophie A. Rocks and Simon J.T. PollardEnvironmental Pollution 225 390 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.065
Bacillus thuringiensis: a successful insecticide with new environmental features and tidings
Gholamreza Salehi Jouzani, Elena Valijanian and Reza SharafiApplied Microbiology and Biotechnology 101 (7) 2691 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8175-y
Effects of genetically modified maize events expressing Cry34Ab1, Cry35Ab1, Cry1F, and CP4 EPSPS proteins on arthropod complex food webs
Zoltán Pálinkás, József Kiss, Mihály Zalai, Ágnes Szénási, Zita Dorner, Samuel North, Guy Woodward and Adalbert BalogEcology and Evolution 7 (7) 2286 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2848
Behavioral effects of insect-resistant genetically modified crops on phytophagous and beneficial arthropods: a review
Peng Han, María Concepción Velasco-Hernández, Ricardo Ramirez-Romero and Nicolas DesneuxJournal of Pest Science 89 (4) 859 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-016-0791-2
Characterization of Natural and Simulated Herbivory on Wild Soybean (Glycine soja Seib. et Zucc.) for Use in Ecological Risk Assessment of Insect Protected Soybean
Hidetoshi Goto, Hiroshi Shimada, Michael J. Horak, et al.PLOS ONE 11 (3) e0151237 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151237
Recovery in environmental risk assessments at EFSA
EFSA Journal 14 (2) (2016)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4313
Advancing environmental risk assessment of regulated products under EFSA's remit
Yann Devos, Helmut Gaugitsch, Alan J. Gray, Lorraine Maltby, Jock Martin, Jeffery S. Pettis, Jörg Romeis, Agnès Rortais, Reinhilde Schoonjans, Joe Smith, Franz Streissl and Glenn W. SuterEFSA Journal 14 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.s0508
Coverage of endangered species in environmental risk assessments at EFSA
EFSA Journal 14 (2) (2016)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4312
Risk assessment of gene flow from genetically engineered virus resistant cassava to wild relatives in Africa: an expert panel report
Karen E. Hokanson, Norman C. Ellstrand, Alfred G. O. Dixon, et al.Transgenic Research 25 (1) 71 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-015-9923-3
Relevance of a new scientific publication (Bøhn et al., 2016) for previous environmental risk assessment conclusions on the cultivation of Bt‐maize events MON810 and Bt11
EFSA Supporting Publications 13 (7) (2016)https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2016.EN-1073
Evolution of risk assessment strategies for food and feed uses of stacked GM events
Catherine Kramer, Phil Brune, Justin McDonald, Monique Nesbitt, Alaina Sauve and Sabine Storck‐WeyhermuellerPlant Biotechnology Journal 14 (9) 1899 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12551
Assessment of unanticipated unintended effects of genetically modified plants on non‐target organisms: a controversy worthy of pursuit?
Y. Devos, F. Álvarez‐Alfageme, A. Gennaro and S. MestdaghJournal of Applied Entomology 140 (1-2) 1 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12248
Biosafety research for non-target organism risk assessment of RNAi-based GE plants
Andrew F. Roberts, Yann Devos, Godwin N. Y. Lemgo and Xuguo ZhouFrontiers in Plant Science 6 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00958
Building Better Environmental Risk Assessments
Raymond Layton, Joe Smith, Phil Macdonald, et al.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 3 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2015.00110
Safety assessment of foods from genetically modified crops in countries with developing economies
Bryan DelaneyFood and Chemical Toxicology 86 132 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2015.10.001
527 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2283-5_27
Experimental Methods to Study Gene Flow
Carol Mallory-Smith, Linda M. Hall and Nilda R. BurgosWeed Science 63 (SP1) 12 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-13-00064.1
Genetically Engineered Crops: From Idea to Product
Jose Rafael Prado, Gerrit Segers, Toni Voelker, Dave Carson, Raymond Dobert, Jonathan Phillips, Kevin Cook, Camilo Cornejo, Josh Monken, Laura Grapes, Tracey Reynolds and Susan Martino-CattAnnual Review of Plant Biology 65 (1) 769 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040039
Potential use of an arthropod database to support the non-target risk assessment and monitoring of transgenic plants
Jörg Romeis, Michael Meissle, Fernando Álvarez-Alfageme, et al.Transgenic Research 23 (6) 995 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-014-9791-2
EFSA’s scientific activities and achievements on the risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) during its first decade of existence: looking back and ahead
Yann Devos, Jaime Aguilera, Zoltán Diveki, et al.Transgenic Research 23 (1) 1 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-013-9741-4
Towards a more open debate about values in decision-making on agricultural biotechnology
Yann Devos, Olivier Sanvido, Joyce Tait and Alan RaybouldTransgenic Research 23 (6) 933 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-013-9754-z
Environmental risk assessment of GE plants under low-exposure conditions
Andrew Roberts, Yann Devos, Alan Raybould, Patrick Bigelow and Alan GrayTransgenic Research 23 (6) 971 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-013-9762-z
7 197 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04001-1_11
International scientific workshop ‘Risk assessment considerations for RNAi‐based GM plants’
EFSA Supporting Publications 11 (12) (2014)https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2014.EN-705
Short-term effects of different genetically modified maize varieties on arthropod food web properties: an experimental field assessment
Ágnes Szénási, Zoltán Pálinkás, Mihály Zalai, Oswald J. Schmitz and Adalbert BalogScientific Reports 4 (1) (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05315
High concentrations of protein test substances may have non-toxic effects onDaphnia magna: Implications for regulatory study designs and ecological risk assessments for GM crops
Alan Raybould, Andrea Burns and Mick HamerGM Crops & Food 5 (4) 296 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.4161/21645698.2014.950540
Protection goals in environmental risk assessment: a practical approach
Monica Garcia-Alonso and Alan RaybouldTransgenic Research 23 (6) 945 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-013-9760-1
The policy chicken and the science egg. Has applied ecology failed the transgenic crops debate?
A. J. GrayTransgenic Research 23 (6) 923 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-013-9747-y
1666 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5797-8_167
Non-coding RNAs in Crop Genetic Modification: Considerations and Predictable Environmental Risk Assessments (ERA)
S. V. RameshMolecular Biotechnology 55 (1) 87 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-013-9648-6
Biosafety Testing of Genetically Modified Ryegrass (Lolium perenne) Using a Model for the Optimum Selection of Test Invertebrates
B.I.P. Barratt, J. H. Todd, C. M. Ferguson, et al.Environmental Entomology 42 (4) 820 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1603/EN13057
Initial risk assessment of genetically modified (GM) microalgae for commodity-scale biofuel cultivation
William J. Henley, R. Wayne Litaker, Lucie Novoveská, et al.Algal Research 2 (1) 66 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2012.11.001
Characterization of the spectrum of insecticidal activity of a double-stranded RNA with targeted activity against Western Corn Rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte)
Pamela M. Bachman, Renata Bolognesi, William J. Moar, et al.Transgenic Research 22 (6) 1207 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-013-9716-5
Deriving criteria to select arthropod species for laboratory tests to assess the ecological risks from cultivating arthropod-resistant genetically engineered crops
Jörg Romeis, Alan Raybould, Franz Bigler, et al.Chemosphere 90 (3) 901 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.035
Plant Biotechnology and Agriculture
Elizabeth E. Hood, Deborah Vicuna Requesens and Kellye A. EversolePlant Biotechnology and Agriculture 541 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-381466-1.00034-1
The Current State of the Environmental Impact Assessment of Abiotic Stress-Tolerant Genetically Modified Plants in the U.S., Canada, Australia, EU and Japan
Yasuyuki Yoshimura and Kazuhito MatsuoJapanese Journal of Crop Science 81 (2) 137 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.81.137
317 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2156-2_15
Ecological risk assessments for transgenic crops with combined insect‐resistance traits: the example of Bt11 × MIR604 maize
A. Raybould, G. Graser, K. Hill and K. WardJournal of Applied Entomology 136 (1-2) 27 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2010.01601.x
Genetically modified crops and aquatic ecosystems: considerations for environmental risk assessment and non-target organism testing
Keri Carstens, Jennifer Anderson, Pamela Bachman, et al.Transgenic Research 21 (4) 813 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-011-9569-8
10765 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3_167
141 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026710.009
Evaluating environmental risks of genetically modified crops: ecological harm criteria for regulatory decision-making
Olivier Sanvido, Jörg Romeis, Achim Gathmann, et al.Environmental Science & Policy 15 (1) 82 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.006
GeneRisk
Hartmut MeyerGeneRisk 269 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23433-0_17
Recommendations for the design of laboratory studies on non-target arthropods for risk assessment of genetically engineered plants
Jörg Romeis, Richard L. Hellmich, Marco P. Candolfi, et al.Transgenic Research 20 (1) 1 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-010-9446-x
Environmental change challenges decision-making during post-market environmental monitoring of transgenic crops
Olivier Sanvido, Jörg Romeis and Franz BiglerTransgenic Research 20 (6) 1191 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-011-9524-8
Systemic risks of genetically modified crops: the need for new approaches to risk assessment
Hartmut MeyerEnvironmental Sciences Europe 23 (1) (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715-23-7
Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants - concepts and controversies
Angelika Hilbeck, Matthias Meier, Jörg Römbke, et al.Environmental Sciences Europe 23 (1) 13 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715-23-13
Derivation and Interpretation of Hazard Quotients To Assess Ecological Risks from the Cultivation of Insect-Resistant Transgenic Crops
Alan Raybould, Geoffrey Caron-Lormier and David A. BohanJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 59 (11) 5877 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf1042079
Regulatory considerations surrounding the deployment Of Bt-expressing cowpea in Africa
Joseph E. Huesing, Jörg Romeis, Norman C. Ellstrand, Alan Raybould, Richard L. Hellmich, Jeffrey D. Wolt, Jeffrey D. Ehlers, L. Clémentine Dabiré-Binso, Christian A. Fatokun, Karen E. Hokanson, Mohammad F. Ishiyaku, Venu M. Margam, Nompumelelo Obokoh, Jacob D. Mignouna, Francis Nang'ayo, Jeremy T. Ouedraogo, Rémy S. Pasquet, Barry R. Pittendrigh, Barbara A. Schaal, Jeff Stein, Manuele Tamò and Larry L. MurdockGM Crops 2 (3) 211 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.4161/gmcr.2.3.18689
Transgenic Crop Plants
Brian R. ShmaefskyTransgenic Crop Plants 435 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04812-8_13
64 553 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02391-0_26
Wildlife Toxicology
Spencer Mortensen, Thomas Nickson and George CobbWildlife Toxicology 39 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439817957-c3
Scientific Opinion on the assessment of potential impacts of genetically modified plants on non‐target organisms
EFSA Journal 8 (11) (2010)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1877
Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants
Jeffrey D. Wolt, Paul Keese, Alan Raybould, et al.Transgenic Research 19 (3) 425 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-009-9321-9
Bt maize expressing Cry3Bb1 does not harm the spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, or its ladybird beetle predator, Stethorus punctillum
Yunhe Li and Jörg RomeisBiological Control 53 (3) 337 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.12.003
Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants
EFSA Journal 8 (11) (2010)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1879
Developing biosafety risk hypotheses for invertebrates exposed to GM plants using conceptual food webs: A case study with elevated triacylglyceride levels in ryegrass
Barbara I.P. Barratt, Jacqui H. Todd, Elisabeth P.J. Burgess and Louise A. MaloneEnvironmental Biosafety Research 9 (3) 163 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr/2011107
Contributions from scientific research to the risk assessment of GMOs. Lessons learned from a symposium held in Brussels, Belgium, 21–22 October 2010
Katia Pauwels, Didier Breyer, Adinda De Schrijver, Martine Goossens and Philippe HermanEnvironmental Biosafety Research 9 (3) 113 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr/2011108
Using existing data to predict and quantify the risks of GM forage to a population of a non-target invertebrate species: A New Zealand case study
Maureen O’Callaghan, Tanya K. Soboleva and Barbara I.P. BarrattEnvironmental Biosafety Research 9 (3) 155 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr/2011103
The CINMa Index: Assessing the potential impact of GM crop management across a heterogeneous landscape
Marcus J. Collier and Ewen MullinsEnvironmental Biosafety Research 9 (3) 135 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr/2011102
Environmental risk assessments for transgenic crops producing output trait enzymes
Alan Raybould, Ann Tuttle, Scott Shore and Terry StoneTransgenic Research 19 (4) 595 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-009-9343-3
The bucket and the searchlight: formulating and testing risk hypotheses about the weediness and invasiveness potential of transgenic crops
Alan RaybouldEnvironmental Biosafety Research 9 (3) 123 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr/2011101
Biofortified sorghum in Africa: using problem formulation to inform risk assessment
Karen E Hokanson, Norman C Ellstrand, Jeremy T Ouedraogo, et al.Nature Biotechnology 28 (9) 900 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0910-900
Gene Flow, Invasiveness, and Ecological Impact of Genetically Modified Crops
Suzanne I. Warwick, Hugh J. Beckie and Linda M. HallAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1168 (1) 72 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04576.x