The interplay between societal concerns and the regulatory frame on GM crops in the European Union
Environ. Biosafety Res., 5 3 (2006) 127-149
Published online: 2007-03-24
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Monitoring Insect Resistance to Bt Maize in the European Union: Update, Challenges, and Future Prospects
Matías García, Carlos García-Benítez, Félix Ortego, Gema P Farinós and Yidong WuJournal of Economic Entomology 116 (2) 275 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toac154
Nano-sunscreens – a double-edged sword in protecting consumers from harm: viewing Australian regulatory policies through the lenses of the European Union
S. M. Solaiman, Jennifer Algie, Shahnaz Bakand, et al.Critical Reviews in Toxicology 49 (2) 122 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2019.1579780
137 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17119-3_5
The psychological perspective on the adoption of approved genetically modified crops in the presence of acceptability constraint: the contingent role of passion
Sumran Ali, Muhammad Ghufran, Muhammad Asim Nawaz and Sumaira Nazar HussainGM Crops & Food 10 (4) 220 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2019.1680241
Modifying attitudes about modified foods: Increased knowledge leads to more positive attitudes
Jonathon McPhetres, Bastiaan T. Rutjens, Netta Weinstein and Jennifer A. BrissonJournal of Environmental Psychology 64 21 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.012
Genetic Engineering of Horticultural Crops
Kailash C. Samal and Gyana Ranjan RoutGenetic Engineering of Horticultural Crops 193 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-810439-2.00010-6
The Effect of Ideology on Attitudes toward GM Food Safety among Chinese Internet Users
Yue Zhang and Yingying SunSustainability 10 (11) 4326 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114326
Plant Biotechnology: Principles and Applications
Usha Kiran, Malik Zainul Abdin and Nalini Kant PandeyPlant Biotechnology: Principles and Applications 367 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2961-5_14
Trends in Approval Times for Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States and the European Union
Richard D. Smart, Matthias Blum and Justus WesselerJournal of Agricultural Economics 68 (1) 182 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12171
Comparative analysis of the labelling of nanotechnologies across four stakeholder groups
Adam Capon, James Gillespie, Margaret Rolfe and Wayne SmithJournal of Nanoparticle Research 17 (8) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-015-3129-8
Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition
Stefaan Blancke, Frank Van Breusegem, Geert De Jaeger, Johan Braeckman and Marc Van MontaguTrends in Plant Science 20 (7) 414 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.03.011
How do GM/non GM coexistence regulations affect markets and welfare?
Marion Desquilbet and Sylvaine PoretEuropean Journal of Law and Economics 37 (1) 51 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-013-9416-x
The non-GM crop regime in the EU: How do Industries deal with this wicked problem?
Linde Inghelbrecht, Joost Dessein and Guido Van HuylenbroeckNJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 70-71 (1) 103 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2014.02.002
Attitudes and attitudinal ambivalence change towards nanotechnology applied to food production
Arnout R.H. Fischer, Heleen van Dijk, Janneke de Jonge, Gene Rowe and Lynn J. FrewerPublic Understanding of Science 22 (7) 817 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512440220
1666 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5797-8_167
10765 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3_167
1 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118373781.ch1
GeneRisk
Hartmut MeyerGeneRisk 269 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23433-0_17
Systemic risks of genetically modified crops: the need for new approaches to risk assessment
Hartmut MeyerEnvironmental Sciences Europe 23 (1) (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715-23-7
Transgenic soya beans: economic implications for EU livestock sector
Ian McFarlane, Julian Park, Graziano Ceddia and Richard PhippsQuality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods 3 (2) 54 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-837X.2011.00096.x
Transgenic Horticultural Crops
Steven StraussTransgenic Horticultural Crops 249 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1201/b10952-13
Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-GM crops in the European Union. A review
Yann Devos, Matty Demont, Koen Dillen, et al.Agronomy for Sustainable Development 29 (1) 11 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008051
Transgenic virus resistance in cultivated squash affects pollinator behaviour
Holly R. Prendeville and Diana PilsonJournal of Applied Ecology 46 (5) 1088 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01698.x
Sustainable Agriculture
Yann Devos, Matty Demont, Koen Dillen, et al.Sustainable Agriculture 203 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_14
Sustainable Agriculture
F. GraefSustainable Agriculture 229 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_15
Health Risks of Genetically Modified Foods
Artemis Dona and Ioannis S. ArvanitoyannisCritical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 49 (2) 164 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1080/10408390701855993
Agro-environmental effects due to altered cultivation practices with genetically modified herbicide-tolerant oilseed rape and implications for monitoring. A review
F. GraefAgronomy for Sustainable Development 29 (1) 31 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2007055
Feasibility of isolation perimeters for genetically modified maize
Yann Devos, Olivier Thas, Mathias Cougnon, et al.Agronomy for Sustainable Development 28 (2) 195 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2007039
Regulating coexistence of GM and non-GM crops without jeopardizing economic incentives
Matty Demont and Yann DevosTrends in Biotechnology 26 (7) 353 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.03.006
Ethics in the Societal Debate on Genetically Modified Organisms: A (Re)Quest for Sense and Sensibility
Yann Devos, Pieter Maeseele, Dirk Reheul, Linda Van Speybroeck and Danny De WaeleJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (1) 29 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-007-9057-6
Philosophy of Biology: About the Fossilization of Disciplines and Other Embryonic Thoughts
Linda Van SpeybroeckActa Biotheoretica 55 (1) 47 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-007-9010-0