General principles for risk assessment of living modified organisms: Lessons from chemical risk assessment
Environ. Biosafety Res., 2 2 (2003) 81-88
Published online: 2003-06-15
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
15 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-28987-3.00009-6
549 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-13987-1.00014-4
Comparison of overwintering potential of seeds in laboratory and field conditions for the risk assessment of transgenic plants: a sunflower case study
Sung Min Han, Seong-Jun Chun and Kyong-Hee NamJournal of Ecology and Environment 47 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.5141/jee.23.014
493 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1079/9781800621176.0025
Removal of toxic heavy metals using genetically engineered microbes: Molecular tools, risk assessment and management strategies
A. Saravanan, P. Senthil Kumar, B. Ramesh and S. SrinivasanChemosphere 298 134341 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134341
19 343 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53183-6_15
19 305 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53183-6_14
Problem formulation and phenotypic characterisation for the development of novel crops
Alan RaybouldTransgenic Research 28 (S2) 135 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-019-00147-0
Using problem formulation to clarify the meaning of weight of evidence and biological relevance in environmental risk assessments for genetically modified crops
Alan Raybould, Karen Holt and Ian KimberGM Crops & Food 10 (2) 63 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2019.1621615
473 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814934-8.00016-8
Waste
Daniel A. ValleroWaste 171 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815060-3.00008-6
An assessment of the risk of Bt-cowpea to non-target organisms in West Africa
Malick N. Ba, Joseph E. Huesing, Manuele Tamò, et al.Journal of Pest Science 91 (4) 1165 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-018-0974-0
Developing gene drive technologies to eradicate invasive rodents from islands
Caroline M. Leitschuh, Dona Kanavy, Gregory A. Backus, et al.Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (sup1) S121 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2017.1365232
Translating Diverse Environmental Data into Reliable Information
Daniel ValleroTranslating Diverse Environmental Data into Reliable Information 251 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812446-8.00009-8
Policy-Led Comparative Environmental Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Crops: Testing for Increased Risk Rather Than Profiling Phenotypes Leads to Predictable and Transparent Decision-Making
Alan Raybould and Phil MacdonaldFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 6 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00043
Environmental Biotechnology
Daniel A. ValleroEnvironmental Biotechnology 523 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407776-8.00013-X
Dynamic role and importance of surrogate species for assessing potential adverse environmental impacts of genetically engineered insect-resistant plants on non-target organisms
Michael Wach, Richard L. Hellmich, Raymond Layton, Jörg Romeis and Patricia G. GadaletaTransgenic Research 25 (4) 499 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-016-9945-5
Can Systematic Reviews Inform GMO Risk Assessment and Risk Management?
Christian Kohl, Geoff Frampton, Jeremy Sweet, et al.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 3 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2015.00113
Plant characterization of Roundup Ready 2 Yield® soybean, MON 89788, for use in ecological risk assessment
Michael J. Horak, Eric W. Rosenbaum, Daniel L. Kendrick, et al.Transgenic Research 24 (2) 213 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-014-9839-3
Regulatory experience and challenges for the release of GM insects
Camilla BeechJournal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit 9 (S1) 71 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-014-0886-8
Towards a more open debate about values in decision-making on agricultural biotechnology
Yann Devos, Olivier Sanvido, Joyce Tait and Alan RaybouldTransgenic Research 23 (6) 933 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-013-9754-z
Crop to wild gene flow: Does more sophisticated research provide better risk assessment?
Tom J. de Jong and Jun RongEnvironmental Science & Policy 27 135 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.002
Deriving criteria to select arthropod species for laboratory tests to assess the ecological risks from cultivating arthropod-resistant genetically engineered crops
Jörg Romeis, Alan Raybould, Franz Bigler, et al.Chemosphere 90 (3) 901 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.035
Bt rice expressing Cry2Aa does not cause direct detrimental effects on larvae of Chrysoperla sinica
Yunhe Li, Yuanyuan Wang, Jörg Romeis, et al.Ecotoxicology 22 (9) 1413 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-013-1127-0
1666 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5797-8_167
GeneRisk
Hartmut MeyerGeneRisk 269 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23433-0_17
10765 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3_167
317 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2156-2_15
Risk Assessment and Ecological Effects of Transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis Crops on Non‐Target OrganismsF
Hui‐Lin Yu, Yun‐He Li and Kong‐Ming WuJournal of Integrative Plant Biology 53 (7) 520 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2011.01047.x
Wickerhamomyces ochangensis sp. nov., an ascomycetous yeast isolated from the soil of a potato field
Kee-Sun Shin, Kyung-Sook Bae, Kang Hyun Lee, et al.International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 61 (10) 2543 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.026682-0
Systemic risks of genetically modified crops: the need for new approaches to risk assessment
Hartmut MeyerEnvironmental Sciences Europe 23 (1) (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715-23-7
Recommendations for the design of laboratory studies on non-target arthropods for risk assessment of genetically engineered plants
Jörg Romeis, Richard L. Hellmich, Marco P. Candolfi, et al.Transgenic Research 20 (1) 1 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-010-9446-x
A semi-quantitative approach to GMO risk-benefit analysis
E. Jane MorrisTransgenic Research 20 (5) 1055 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-010-9480-8
64 553 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02391-0_26
Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants
EFSA Journal 8 (11) 1879 (2010)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1879
Statistical considerations for the safety evaluation of GMOs
EFSA Journal 8 (2) 1250 (2010)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1250
Wildlife Toxicology
Spencer Mortensen, Thomas Nickson and George CobbWildlife Toxicology 39 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439817957-c3
Transgene × Environment Interactions in Genetically Modified Wheat
Simon L. Zeller, Olena Kalinina, Susanne Brunner, et al.PLoS ONE 5 (7) e11405 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011405
An approach for post‐market monitoring of potential environmental effects of Bt‐maize expressing Cry1Ab on natural enemies
O. Sanvido, J. Romeis and F. BiglerJournal of Applied Entomology 133 (4) 236 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2008.01367.x
Commentary: Statistical aspects of environmental risk assessment of GM plants for effects on non-target organisms
Joe N. Perry, Cajo J.F. ter Braak, Philip M. Dixon, et al.Environmental Biosafety Research 8 (2) 65 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr/2009009
Making effective use of existing data for case‐by‐case risk assessments of genetically engineered crops
J. Romeis, N. C. Lawo and A. RaybouldJournal of Applied Entomology 133 (8) 571 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2009.01423.x
An overview of general features of risk assessments of genetically modified crops
Wendy Craig, Mark Tepfer, Giuliano Degrassi and Decio RipandelliEuphytica 164 (3) 853 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9643-8
Assessment of risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops to nontarget arthropods
Jörg Romeis, Detlef Bartsch, Franz Bigler, et al.Nature Biotechnology 26 (2) 203 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1381
Developing a method for laboratory biosafety testing impacts of transgenic plants on non‐target insects
B. I. P. Barratt, K. E. Crook, C. M. Ferguson, P. D. Johnstone and L. A. MaloneEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 128 (3) 437 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2008.00739.x
Effect of Bt Maize Mon 810 Expressing Cry 1 Ab Toxin on Aphidius Colemani in Tritrophic Plant - Herbivore - Parasitoid System
Julia Górecka, Monika Godzina and Zbigniew DąbrowskiJournal of Plant Protection Research 48 (1) 130 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.2478/v10045-008-0013-x
Guidance for Contained Field Trials of Vector Mosquitoes Engineered to Contain a Gene Drive System: Recommendations of a Scientific Working Group
M. Benedict, P. D'Abbs, S. Dobson, et al.Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 8 (2) 127 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2007.0273
Reply to Early-tier tests insufficient for GMO risk assessment
Nature Biotechnology 25 (1) 36 (2007)https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0107-36
Transgenic Crops IV
J. C. Popelka and T. J. V. HigginsBiotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Transgenic Crops IV 59 251 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36752-9_13
Ecological versus ecotoxicological methods for assessing the environmental risks of transgenic crops
Alan RaybouldPlant Science 173 (6) 589 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.09.003
Conservation Biology, Genetically Modified Organisms, and the Biosafety Protocol
RYAN HILL and CYRIE SENDASHONGAConservation Biology 20 (6) 1620 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00534.x
Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants
D. A. Andow and Claudia ZwahlenEcology Letters 9 (2) 196 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00846.x
Transgenic crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis toxins and biological control
Jörg Romeis, Michael Meissle and Franz BiglerNature Biotechnology 24 (1) 63 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1180
The interplay between societal concerns and the regulatory frame on GM crops in the European Union
Yann Devos, Dirk Reheul, Danny De Waele and Linda Van SpeybroeckEnvironmental Biosafety Research 5 (3) 127 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2007002
Plant Virus Epidemiology
Ian Cooper and Roger A.C. JonesAdvances in Virus Research, Plant Virus Epidemiology 67 1 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3527(06)67001-2
Reply to Ecological risk assessment for Bt crops
Jörg Romeis, Michael Meissle and Franz BiglerNature Biotechnology 24 (7) 751 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0706-751
The detection and decay of Cry1Ab Bt-endotoxins within non-target slugs,Deroceras reticulatum(Mollusca: Pulmonata), following consumption of transgenic corn
J. D. Harwood and J. J. ObryckiBiocontrol Science and Technology 16 (1) 77 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1080/09583150500257216
Problem formulation and hypothesis testing for environmental risk assessments of genetically modified crops
Alan RaybouldEnvironmental Biosafety Research 5 (3) 119 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2007004
169 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470988497.ch7
A conceptual framework for the design of environmental post-market monitoring of genetically modified plants
Olivier Sanvido, Franco Widmer, Michael Winzeler and Franz BiglerEnvironmental Biosafety Research 4 (1) 13 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2005008
Crop Ferality and Volunteerism
Alan RaybouldCrop Ferality and Volunteerism 389 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420037999.ch23
Tiered tests to assess the environmental risk of fitness changes in hybrids between transgenic crops and wild relatives: the example of virus resistantBrassica napus
Alan Raybould and Ian CooperEnvironmental Biosafety Research 4 (3) 127 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2005018
Conceptualizing risk assessment methodology for genetically modified organisms
Ryan A. HILLEnvironmental Biosafety Research 4 (2) 67 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2005012
The impact of transgenic plants on natural enemies: a critical review of laboratory studies
G.L. Lövei and S. ArpaiaEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 114 (1) 1 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-8703.2005.00235.x
Science-Based Risk Assessment for Nontarget Effects of Transgenic Crops
DAVID A. ANDOW and ANGELIKA HILBECKBioScience 54 (7) 637 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0637:SRAFNE]2.0.CO;2
The potential of transgenic chickpeas for pest control and possible effects on non-target arthropods
Jörg Romeis, Hari C Sharma, Kiran K Sharma, Sampa Das and Bidyut K SarmahCrop Protection 23 (10) 923 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2004.02.004
Risk Assessment and Precaution in the Biosafety Protocol
Ryan Hill, Sam Johnston and Cyrie SendashongaReview of European Community and International Environmental Law 13 (3) 263 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2004.00407.x
Editorial: Negative and positive data, statistical power, and confidence intervals
D. A. AndowEnvironmental Biosafety Research 2 (2) 75 (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2003008