A review of the environmental safety of the Cry1Ab protein
Environ. Biosafety Res., 10 3 (2011) 51-71
Published online: 2012-04-30
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Genetically engineered eucalyptus expressing pesticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis for insect resistance: a risk assessment evaluation perspective
Dror Avisar, Alexandre Manoeli, Anselmo Azevedo dos Santos, Antonio Carlos Da Mota Porto, Carolina Da Silva Rocha, Edival Zauza, Esteban R. Gonzalez, Everton Soliman, José Mateus Wisniewski Gonsalves, Lorena Bombonato, Maria P. Galan, Maurício M. Domingues, Murici Carlos Candelaria, Reginaldo Mafia, Rodrigo Neves Graça, Shelly Azulay, Sivan Livne, Tatiane Buono Dias, Thaís Regina Drezza, William Jose Silva and Ana Cristina PinheiroFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 12 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1322985
Comparative Effect of Bacillus thuringiensis Endotoxins on the Fitness of F1 Sorghum×Weed Hybrids
Titus O. Magomer, Eliud K. Ngugi, Solomon I. Shibair and Eunice MutituBiotechnology(Faisalabad) 21 (1) 30 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3923/biotech.2022.30.38
Assessing the effects of an acute exposure to worst-case concentration of Cry proteins on zebrafish using the embryotoxicity test and proteomics analysis
Leonardo Vieira, Denise Cavalcante Hissa, Terezinha Souza, Íris Flávia Sousa Gonçalves, Joseph Alberto Medeiros Evaristo, Fábio César Sousa Nogueira, Ana Fontenele Urano Carvalho and Davi FariasChemosphere 264 128538 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128538
Advancing ecological risk assessment on genetically engineered breeding stacks with combined insect-resistance traits
Justin McDonald, Andrea Burns and Alan RaybouldTransgenic Research 29 (1) 135 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-019-00185-8
Sublethal Endpoints in Non-target Organism Testing for Insect-Active GE Crops
Andrew Roberts, Chad J. Boeckman, Marina Mühl, et al.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 8 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00556
Teosinte and maize × teosinte hybrid plants in Europe−Environmental risk assessment and management implications for genetically modified maize
Yann Devos, Sol Ortiz-García, Karen E. Hokanson and Alan RaybouldAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 259 19 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.02.032
Bt crops benefit natural enemies to control non-target pests
Jun-Ce Tian, Ju Yao, Li-Ping Long, Jörg Romeis and Anthony M. SheltonScientific Reports 5 (1) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16636
Transportability of confined field trial data for environmental risk assessment of genetically engineered plants: a conceptual framework
Monica Garcia-Alonso, Paul Hendley, Franz Bigler, et al.Transgenic Research 23 (6) 1025 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-014-9785-0
Environmental risk assessment of GE plants under low-exposure conditions
Andrew Roberts, Yann Devos, Alan Raybould, Patrick Bigelow and Alan GrayTransgenic Research 23 (6) 971 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-013-9762-z