EDP Sciences Journals List
Home Document
Subscriber Authentication Point
Free access article

Issue Environ. Biosafety Res.
Volume 2, Number 2, April-June 2003
Page(s) 81 - 88
DOI 10.1051/ebr:2003004

References

  • Barnthouse LW (1994) Issues in Ecological Risk Assessment: the CRAM Perspective. Risk Analysis 14: 251-256
  • Begley R (1996) Risk-based remediation guidelines take hold. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30: 438A-441A
  • Bogen KT (1994) A note on compounded conservatism. Risk Analysis 14: 379-381
  • Burmaster DE, Anderson PD (1994) Principles of good practice for the use of Monte Carlo techniques in human health and ecological risk assessments. Risk Analysis 14: 477-481
  • Burmaster DE, Harris RH (1993) The magnitude of compounding conservatism in Superfund risk assessments. Risk Analysis 13: 131-134
  • CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environ- ment) (1996) A Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment: General Guidance. Prepared by the CCME Subcommittee on Environmental Quality Criteria for Contaminated Sites
  • CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (1996) Technical guidance documents in support of the Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on risk assessment for new substances and the Commission Regulation No. 1488/94 on risk assessment for existing substances. Brussels, Belgium
  • CFIA (Canadian Food Inspection Agency) (2001) Regula- tory Directive Dir94-08: Assessing Criteria for Determining Environmental Safety of Plants with Novel Traits. Plant Health and Production Division, Plant Biosafety Office
  • Chapman P, Paine MD, Arthur AD, Taylor LA (1996) A triad study of sediment quality associated with a major, relatively untreated marine sewage discharge. Marine Pollution Bulletin 32: 47-64
  • Clarkson TW (1990) Human health risks from methylmercury in fish. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 9: 957-961
  • Cullen AC (1994) Measures of compounding conservatism in probabilistic risk assessment. Risk Analysis 14: 389-393
  • Cura JJ (1998) Ecological risk assessment. Water Environ. Res. 70: 968-971
  • Dakins ME, Toll JE, Small MJ (1994) Risk-based environmental remediation: decision framework and role of uncertainty. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 13: 1907-1915
  • Dakins ME, Toll JE, Small MJ, Brand KP (1996) Risk-based environmental remediation: Bayesian Monte Carlo analysis and the expected value of sample information. Risk Analysis 16: 67-79
  • DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) (2000) Guidelines for Environmental Risk Assessment and Management - Revised Departmental Guidance. United Kingdom
  • DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and Regions) (1999) Guidance on principles for risk assessment and monitoring for the release of genetically modified organisms. DETR/ACRE guidance note 12, London, UK
  • EC (European Commission) (1998) Quantitative Environ- mental Risk Assessment for Genetically Modified Organ- isms. Institute for Health and Consumer Protection
  • EC (European Community) (2001) Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms, 12 March 2001
  • EC (European Commission) (2002) Commission decision of 24 July 2002 establishing guidance notes supplementing Annex II to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC
  • Edmonds Institute (1998) Manual for Assessing Ecological and Human Health Effects of Genetically Engineered Organisms. Prepared by the Scientists' Working Group on Biosafety
  • Ellison AM (1996) An introduction to Bayesian inference for ecological research and environmental decision-making. Ecol. Appl. 6: 1036-1046
  • EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (1997) Guidance on Cumulative Risk Assessment. Part 1. Planning and Scoping, Science Policy Council, EPA, Washington, D.C.
  • EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (1998) Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA 630/R-95-002F, Washington, D.C.
  • ERMA (Environmental Risk Management Authority) (1999) Identifying risks for applications under the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996, ER-TG-01-1 9/99, New Zealand
  • ERMA (Environmental Risk Management Authority) (2000a) Preparing information on risks, costs and benefits for applications under the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996, ER-TG-03-1 7/00, New Zealand
  • ERMA (Environmental Risk Management Authority) (2000b) Assessment of effects of hazardous substances and new organisms on human health, ER-TG-02-1 1/00, New Zealand
  • Fiksel JR, Covello VT (1986) The suitability and applicability of risk assessment methods for environmental applications of biotechnology. In Fiksel JR, Covello VT, eds, Biotechnology Risk Assessment - Issues and Methods for Environmental Introductions. Permagon Press, pp 1-34
  • Finkel AM (1990) Confronting Uncertainty in Risk Management. Center for Risk Management, Resources for the Future, 1616 P Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
  • Finkel AM (1994) Risk assessment research: only the beginning. Risk Analysis 14: 907-911
  • Finley B, Paustenbach D (1994) The benefits of probabilistic exposure assessment: three case studies involving contaminated air, water and soil. Risk Analysis 14: 53-73
  • Francis RICC (1992) Use of risk analysis to assess fishery management strategies: a case study using orange roughy on the Chatham Rise, New Zealand. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49: 922-930
  • Gaylor DW, Chen JJ, Sheehan DM (1993) Uncertainty in cancer risk assessments. Risk Analysis 13: 149-154
  • Hamilton JT, Viscusi WK (1994) Human health risk assessments for Superfund. Ecol. Law Q. 21: 573-610
  • Harvey T, Mahaffey KR, Velazquez S, Dourson M (1995) Holistic risk assessment: an emerging process for environ- mental decisions. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 22: 110-117
  • Hill RA (1996) From science to decision-making: the applicability of Bayesian methods to risk assessment. Human Ecol. Risk Assess. 2: 636-642
  • Hill RA, Chapman PM, Mann GS, Lawrence GS (2000) Level of detail in ecological risk assessments. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 40: 471-477
  • Ingersoll CG, Dillon T, Biddinger GR (1997) Ecological Risk Assessment of Contaminated Sediments. SETAC Press, Pensacola, FL, USA
  • Kappeli O, Auberson L (1998) How safe is safe enough in plant genetic engineering? Trends Plant Sci. 3: 276-281
  • Kjaer C, Damgaard C, Kjellsson G, Strandberg B, Strandberg M (1999) Ecological risk assessment of genetically modified higher plants - identification of data needs. NERI Technical Report No. 303. Ministry of Environment and Energy, National Environmental Research Institute, Denmark
  • Kjellsson G (1997) Principles and procedures for ecological risk assessment of transgenic plants. In Kjellsson G, Simonsen V, Ammann K, eds, Methods for Risk Assessment of Transgenic Plants II - Pollination, Gene-Transfer and Population Impacts. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland, pp 221-236
  • Maguire LA (1991) Risk analysis for conservation biologists. Conserv. Biol. 5: 123-125
  • Mathes K, Winter G (1993) Ecological risk assessment and the regulation of chemicals: 3. Balancing risks and benefits. Sci. Total Environ., supplement 1993: 1679-1687
  • McCarty LS (1997) Environmental risk assessment within a decision making framework. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 16: 122-123
  • McKone TE, Bogen KT (1991) Predicting the uncertainties in risk assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 25: 1674-1681
  • Menzie C, Henning MH, Cura J, Findelstein K, Gentile J, Maughan M, Metchell D, Petron S, Potocki B, Sversky S, Tyler P (1996) Special report of the Massachusetts weight- of-evidence workgroup: a weight-of-evidence approach for evaluating ecological risk. Human Ecol. Risk Assess. 2: 277-304
  • Miller LM, Kapuscinski AR, Senanan W (2002) A biosafety approach to addressing risks posed by aquaculture escapees. Proceedings of the Expert Consultation on Biosafety and Environmental Impact of Genetic Enhancement and Introduction of Improved Tilapia Strains/Alien Species in Africa, 20-23 February 2002, Nairobi, Kenya. Published by the International Centre for Living Aquatic Resources Management (ICLARM)
  • Morgan MG, Henrion M (1990) Uncertainty - A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge University Press
  • Nickson TE, McKee MJ (2002) Ecological assessment of crops derived through biotechnology. In Thomas JA, Fuchs FL, eds, Biotechnology and Safety Assessment, 3rd edn. Academic Press, pp 233-252
  • North DW, Balson WE (1985) Risk assessment and acid rain policy: a decision framework that includes uncertainty. In Mandelbaumn P, ed, Proceedings of the conference Acid Rain: Economic Assessment. Plenum Press, New York
  • NRC (National Research Council) (1983) Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
  • NRC (National Research Council) (1993) Issues in Risk Assessment. Committee on Risk Assessment Methodology, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
  • NRC (National Research Council) (1996) Understanding Risk - Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Committee on Risk Assessment Methodology, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
  • NRC (National Research Council) (2002) Environmental Effects of Transgenic Plants - the Scope and Adequacy of Regulation. Committee on Risk Assessment Methodology, National Research Council, National Academy Press. Washington, D.C.
  • OGTR (Office of the Gene Technology Regulator) (2001) Risk assessment framework for license applications to the office of the gene technology regulator, Canberra, Australia
  • OSTP (Office of Science and Technology Policy) (2001) Case Studies of Environmental Regulations for Biotechnology, Executive Office of the President, United States of America, Washington, D.C.
  • PCT (Pew Charitable Trust) (2002) Three years later: Genetically engineered corn and the monarch butterfly controversy. Issue Brief, Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology. Document available free of charge at http:// www.pewtrusts.com
  • Peterman RM (1990) Statistical power analysis can improve fisheries research and management. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47: 2-15
  • Power M, McCarty LS (1997) Fallacies in ecological risk assessment practices. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31: 370A-375A
  • Punt AE, Hilborn R (1997) Fisheries stock assessment and decision analysis: the Bayesian approach. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 7: 35-63
  • Reckhow KH (1994) Importance of Scientific Uncertainty in Decision Making. Environ. Manage. 18: 161-166
  • Sears MK, Hellmich RL, Stanley-Horn DE, Oberhauser KS, Pleasants JM, Mattila HR, Siegfried BD, Dively GP (2001) Impact of Bt corn pollen on monarch butterfly populations: a risk assessment. PNAS 98: 11937-11942
  • Strandberg B, Kjellsson G, Lokke H (1998) Hierarchical risk assessment of transgenic plants: proposal for an integrated system. Biosafety J. 4: 21
  • Strauss HS (1991) Lessons from chemical risk assessment. In Levin MA, Strauss HS, eds, Risk Assessment in Genetic Engineering. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York, pp 297-318
  • Suter GW II (1990) Uncertainty in Environmental Risk Assessment. In Furstenberg GM, ed, Acting Under Uncer- tainty: Multidisciplinary Conceptions. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 203-230
  • Suter GW II (1993) Ecological Risk Assessment. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton
  • Thompson GG (1992) A Bayesian approach to management advice when stock-recruitment parameters are uncertain. Fish. Bull. 90: 561-573
  • UNEP (United Nations Environment Program) (1995) UNEP International Technical Guidelines for Safety in Biotechnology
  • Vatter PA, Bradley SP, Frey Jr SP, Jackson BB (1978) Quantitative Methods in Management: Text and Cases. Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Illinois
  • Walters CJ (1986) Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. Blackburn Press
Abstract

Copyright ISBR, EDP Sciences



What is OpenURL?

The OpenURL standard is a protocol for transmission of metadata describing the resource that you wish to access. An OpenURL link contains article metadata and directs it to the OpenURL server of your choice. The OpenURL server can provide access to the resource and also offer complementary services (specific search engine, export of references...). The OpenURL link can be generated by different means.
  • If your librarian has set up your subscription with an OpenURL resolver, OpenURL links appear automatically on the abstract pages.
  • You can define your own OpenURL resolver with your EDPS Account. In this case your choice will be given priority over that of your library.
  • You can use an add-on for your browser (Firefox or I.E.) to display OpenURL links on a page (see http://www.openly.com/openurlref/). You should disable this module if you wish to use the OpenURL server that you or your library have defined.