Free Access
Issue
Environ. Biosafety Res.
Volume 2, Number 3, July-September 2003
Page(s) 161 - 171
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2003011
Published online 15 November 2003
  • Biotechnology and the European Public Concerted Action Group (BEPCAG) (1997) Europe ambivalent on biotechnology. Nature 387: 845-847
  • CEC (1990) Council Directive 90/220/EEC of 23 April 1990 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms
  • CEC (1992) Opinions of Europeans on Biotechnology in 1991. Eurobarometer 35.1. Science Museum, London
  • CEC (1993) Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering: What Europeans Think about it in 1993. Eurobarometer 39.1. CEC, Brussels
  • CEC (1997) European Opinions on Modern Biotechnology. Eurobarometer 46.1. CEC, Brussels
  • CEC (2000a) The Europeans and Biotechnology. Eurobarometer 52.1. CEC, Brussels
  • CEC (2000b) Press Release of 13 July 2000. European Commission: press and information service IP/00/778
  • CEC (2000c) Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle. CEC, Brussels
  • CEC (2001) Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC - Commission Declaration
  • Danish Ministry of Trade and Industry, The (2000) The Danish Government Statement on Ethics and Genetic Engineering. Copenhagen
  • EPA (1997) Notification C/DK/97/01. Summary of the evaluation carried out by the Danish competent authority
  • FAO (1997) Risk management and food safety. Report of a joint FAO/WHO consultation Rome, Italy, 27 to 31 January 1997. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 65
  • Holtug N (2000) The harm principle and genetically modified food. J. Agr. Environ. Ethic 14: 169-178
  • Jasanoff S (1990) The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
  • Jensen KK (2002) The Moral Foundation of the Precautionary Principle. J. Agr. Environ. Ethic 15: 39-55 [CrossRef]
  • Levidow L and Carr S (eds.) (2000) Precautionary Regulation: GM Crops in the European Union, J. Risk Res., Special Issue 3 (3)
  • Mill JS (1859) On Liberty. In Mill JS, ed, Utilitarianism, On Liberty, Considerations on Representative Government London Dent, 1993, pp 69-185
  • NFNA (1997) Vedr. anmeldelse af foderroe (Beta vulgaris L. ssp. vulgaris) til markedsføring, i henhold til del C, artikel 12(3) i Direktiv 90/220/EØF. Skov- og Naturstyrelsen.
  • NRC (1996) Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Academy Press, Washington D.C.
  • OECD (1993) Safety Considerations for Biotechnology: Scale-Up of Crop Plants. Publications Service, OECD, Paris
  • PD (1997) Vedr.: Vurdering af anmeldelse om markedsføring af en genetisk modificeret foderroe (C/DK/97/01). Plantedirektoratet.
  • Rawls J (1993) Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press, New York
  • Shrader-Frechette KS (1985) Risk Analysis and Scientific Method, Reidel, Dordrecht
  • Tømmerås BÅ, Johnsen Ø, Skrøppa T, Hindar K, Holten J, Tufto J (1996) Long-term environmental impacts of release of transgenic Norway spruce (Picea abies). Trondheim: NINA/NIKU, Foundation for Nature Research and Cultural Heritage Research
  • VFA (1997) Vedr. vurdering fra Instituttet for Toksikologi af ansøgning C/DK/97/01 om markedsføring af gensplejset foderroe A5/15. Veterinær- og Fødevaredirektoratet
  • WHO (1995) Application of Risk Analysis to Food Standards Issues, Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation, 13-17 March 1995, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Wynne B (1996) May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View on the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide. In Lash S, Szerszynski B and Wynne B, eds, Risk, Environment and Modernity. Towards a new Modernity. Sage, London, pp 44-83

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.